The last thing Anakin Skywalker did was to return to good side and help his son out. Yet, rather than embrace this legacy for his now deceased father, Luke either personally or let someone else re-mask him, so he could be burned atop of some deforested wood like some cheap Guy Fawkes bonfire night prop!
Surely this was wrong. Why did Luke allow his late father's body to be desecrate in this way?
Well, burning the body is a traditional way to honor a warrior at his funeral. That's how it's been in history, or at least in old literature.
Also, I believe it's canon that Anakin's organic body disappeared, like Obi Wan and Yoda. And that the "body" that Luke burned was his mask and metal parts left behind. Something for Luke to burn in the body's place. So he didn't "remask" his father.
You can decide whether to agree with them and their sources, or disprove them. As for me, I'm fine with the mask where it was. The significance of burning the body outweighs the problem with the mask.
reply share
Well the source given there is a kiddies learn to read book, so I guess that's pushing the "canon" boat as far as it can go...
As I was saying, definitely not film canon - although it's funny because I don't recall ever seeing any hullabaloo over why he didn't fade away, like there certainly was re Qui-Gon Jinn.
If by fun, you mean, not approaching at a party and asking them a Question about why Luke allowed his father to be re-masked and burned on a funeral Pyre in Return of the Jedi, a movie that's almost 40 Years old, then NO, I guess I'm not fun then..
I've always been of the opinion that just because Darth Vader did something good right at the end of his life, it didn't redeem him and make up for the literally millions of innocent people he killed and helped kill. Just think of all the Ewoks that were killed during the battle for Endor. How do you think the survivors would feel if, just a few hours later, Luke comes back with Vader's body and they're expected to treat him like some kind of hero and give him a "fine send off", when he was responsible for the death's of their friends and relatives? Imagine if Hitler had done something good at the end of his life, do you think the remaining Jews would all be like "Hey, let's give him a hero's funeral, he has redeemed himself!"?
Just because Return Of The Jedi provided a satisfying conclusion for the original trilogy, doesn't necessarily mean that Anakin is redeemed and forgiven of any wrongdoing. People come along later and slap on terms like "redeemed" as if it defines the outcome of the whole story. One of the reasons that redeemed pops up is that the audience wishes for Anakin to be redeemed. But I don't think anyone seriously considers all those sins atoned for.
It's not a hero's funeral. It's one man burning the body of the father who gave his life to save him in the end. Whatever you think of Vader's career, I should think there is plenty justification in the story for Luke to personally commemorate the end of his life, privately.
What would you prefer? Chucking Vader's bones down a well? Feeding him to the Ewoks.? Dragging him through the streets of Theed? Stuck on a spike in Bespin?
It's a bit early in the conversation chain to be pulling Hitler out of hat but it's worth remembering the Ewoks were quite vicious themselves - don't forget they were quite happy to make musical instruments out of the helmets of the Stormtroopers they'd ruthlessly slain...
Plus - Did they really know much of Darth Vader? I'm not sure if he would have been down on Endor much before the whole shenanigans kicked off.
And that doesn't change the fact that they're only seeing Vader because Luke chose to dress him back up and put his helmet back on after he'd fled the Death Star. I'm not sure if Darth wore pyjamas under that suit but he could surely have dressed him up more appropriate if he'd wanted him to have a redeemed Jedi hero's send off rather than that of the panto villain...