This movie is garbage, anyone agree?

I`m sorry but I don`t agree with most of the people here...the film had Sean Connery and that in itself was alright. In fact the numbers in the box office are not that far from octopussy (it wasn`t a runaway winner in bond vs bond category IMO). Some say the theme was cheesy but to me it fits...it was the 80`s and very "bondy theme" like

mass effect 3 sucks! ...after shepard gets hit by harbinger laser beam

Couldn't disagree with you more.

It's my favorite Connery, hands down.

No gun barrel or Bond theme due to legal issues - that wasn't the film's fault. It was an unfortunate obstacle the filmmkaers couldn't overcome...it was among the lawyers.

Basinger was always just a body...what Bond girl wasn't or isn't? Name me one Bond girl who is hailed for her acting prowess.

The game was cool - it was appropros for the 80s. Video games were all the rage in 1983 and Largo liked them...easy to believe a game room at a benefit.

First of all this was never an official 007 movie a mere remake of Thunderball was never endorsed by Cubby Brocolli. Moonraker was not bad as for Diamonds are forever was my least favourite of the Connery Bonds but the worst one of all is the latest Quatum of Solace was by far the worst.

The greatest trick the devil ever played was convincing the world that he did not exist

The movie is uneven, but I wouldn't call it garbage. It's major highlight is Barbara Carrera, who plays one of the most mentally unstable villains ever in any Bond movie, leaving the main villain barely memorable.

The fact that she's also beautiful enough to be a Bond Girl makes the impact doubly strong. She essentially merges the Bond Girl with the villain, creating a unique situation alluded to in other movies, but only as side characters.

Connery's toupe looks a bit obvious, but I enjoy the film's rawer low-budget style. It almost seems truer to Bond in its roughness and lack of gloss. Connery is old but reminds us why he is the best and crassest, especially in the final interactions with Carrera, where he triumphs by manipulating the narcissism of Carrera's black widow character. He schools Carrera as an elder to a wild youth.

I think calling this movie garbage is ludicrous, honestly. It's no worse than Octopussy, but it does lack the high production values of most Bond movies.

worst bond by far, yep its garbage.

When there's no more room in hell, The dead will walk the earth...

Yeah, it's pretty bad, but there are parts of it that I do kind of like. I think Von Sydow is a legend, I like Fox's entirely different and more aggressive version of M, love the way they actually make reference to his age, and place in the world. But yeah, mostly rubbish in terms of execution, and that title song makes Madonna's much maligned Die Another Day theme look like Beethoven's 9th.

___
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLqcClh3qKQ

I actually thought Diamonds are Forever was the worst Bond movie, but I think this one takes the cake. Why did they even bother making this film? It wasn't an Eon production and it shows. Connery didn't have the grace, style, sexiness or coolness that he's had in all the other Bond films. The music and theme song of this movie absolutely sucks to the nth degree, and is it true that the title of this film is related to Connery stating he'd NEVER do another Bond film and then he did this so they titled it NSNA? If so, that is lame. The title of the movie should be related to the story/characters/plot of the movie, not Sean Connery's real-life. This film should have NEVER been made and Sean Connery acted more like a grandpa playing Bond versus Bond, James Bond. And they released it with the same year of Octopussy? What in the world were they thinking? If it isn't an Eon production, then it just isn't Bond. Plain and simple.

I rate this film as the LOWEST and WEAKEST of the Bond franchise.


I specifically reminded her - bedside table! On the Kangaroo!

Don't agree. Loved the movie. Sorry.