MovieChat Forums > Play It Again, Sam (1972) Discussion > The awkward and inappropriate rape discu...

The awkward and inappropriate rape discussion...


I was thoroughly enjoying this film right up until the scene when Diane Keaton and Woody Allen are in his apartment and have that strange conversation about rape.

That one moment destroyed any sympathy I had for both their characters and left a bad taste in my mouth for the rest of film.

Perhaps I'm making too much of it, but I found it to be in bad taste and not fitting with the rest of the film's spirit.

I'm curious to know what other people thought, too!

reply

Sure, it wasn't perfect, not to mention nice, but at the same time, it brought about that bit of imperfection the flick needed. People do joke about weird (and inappropriate) stuff in real life, so why not in movies.

reply

Rape fantasies and the discussions thereof are not alien concepts. There is even a short story called Rape Fantasies where one of the main characters fantasizes about it. For uncomfortable discussions in Woody Allen films, the Annie Hall scene with John Glover discussing how he'd like to die is exceptionally creepy, and brings about a great one liner from Allen "heavy, he wants to be eaten by squirrels".Woody Allen movies tend to joke about the gravest things in life as a coping mechanism.

reply

We were just watching PIAS again last night, and my husband and I both thought that this rape joke scene would not fly with modern audiences. In the early '70s, though, it was considered OK and typical.

reply

Rape is never funny unless you rape a clown.

reply

[deleted]

Exactly. Have to admit I cringed during that scene while watching the film last night. But unlike the early 70s, people now are constantly concious of anything that is the slightest bit politically incorrect, offensive or could be considered controversial. In fact nowdays people seem to proactively try to find something politically incorrect.

reply

The part of that sequence I found funny was when Diane Keaton said she'd pretend to go along with it, until she could grab something heavy and smash the guy's head in. At that moment, if you look close, EVEN BOGART looked nervous!

reply

[deleted]

A different sensibilty in the early 70s I guess. Remember Blazing Saddles:

Recruiter: 'so, what are your qualifications?'
Criminal: 'rape, murder, kidnapping, assault, and rape.'
Recruiter: 'you said rape twice.'
Criminal: 'I like rape.'

reply

Where are da white women at ?

(Sorry, just an example. And, this was AFTER PIAS.)

reply

And then there are the films that use the N word many, many times like Pulp Fiction. I don't remember anyone putting up a stink about that. But really, I don't understand the whole concept of political correctness anyway. People go to these films, and also watch them at home all the time, and they scream bloody murder if something happens that's politically incorrect. Yet, in many of the same films people are being shot, tortured, stabbed, strangled, etc, etc, etc, and nobody says much about all the violence. Nice world we live in. You can murder your ex-wife and her friend, who you never even met, and get away with it scot free; but if you're a witness at the same trial, and it's rumored that you said the N word at a party ten years before the trial, you'll be fired from your job in disgrace and your life will be ruined! Unbelievable.

reply




Stadler and Heezgawn are right - it was a different time and a different climate.

I remember being shocked at a clip from a (British) sketch show of the Sixties, a black and white show re-shown recently where a girl is running from door to door in fast motion shouting "Rape!" at each door. It just wasn't viewed in the same light in those days, rightly or wrongly.





reply

The only time rape is funny... a gay friend and I were watching something about Timothy McVeigh years ago. My friend said, "I'd love to go to prison... just so I could rape his ass... evil as he is, he's still hot... and deserves to be raped."

A moment of politically incorrect zen...

reply

You are remembering a feature film called "The Knack, and How to Get It" (1965). It is British, but not a sketch show. I agree that it is shocking to hear today, but either it was not seen in the same light back then, or perhaps they were making a social comment? Perhaps I am reaching, but I think that the film makers intended it for a reason...what do your think? Did they include this as a parody or social comment or what? Perhaps it was not thought out? Just thrown in for shock value? Talk among yourselves.

reply

Don't forget the highly inappropriate joke about suicide in the museum. This destroyed the movie much more for me. A lot of people commit suicide every day and blah blah blah blah...

I'm with another poster on this thread. Nowadays people proactively search for reasons to be offended. It's a national sport. Professional offendees. Seriously, if a forty-years-old politically incorrect joke in a movie causes so much grief for you, how can you live with the knowledge that ten thousands of people suffer from an oil spill in the Gulf, that in the middle east hundreds of thousands of people are killed, raped, displaced etc.

People nowadays have no real problems or causes of real grief any more, so they seek out grief and offence wherever they can find it. And wallow in it. Makes them feel alive, I suppose.




reply

Well put. I remember a professor, whom I liked and otherwise respected, using this portion of the script as an object lesson about artistic insensitivity, shifting social mores, or some such. I don't think more than a handful of us had been previously exposed to the movie, and I felt genuinely sorry for the unfornate majority.

I hate to be the guy to mention this film to one of these folks in subsequent years.

"Isn't that the one that tries to joke about rape?" Oy. Might as well spray paint "Culture Ignoramus" on your forehead, if you can make it fit.

"I was nowhere near Oakland!"

reply

Political correctness has rendered laughter an inappropriate coping mechanism for life's ugliness. No, there was never anything funny about real-life rape, child molestation, spousal abuse, etc. But I think it was a healthier time when we could laugh at the inherent absurdity of such matters and could make fools of the nutcases who would commit such crimes. Even a film such as ARTHUR is culturally obsolete. Try making a film about a funny alcoholic today.

Yet it still seems acceptable to make drug jokes in contemporary films. For those who object to the rape joke in PIAS, keep in mind that such a joke would have been no more offensive at the time than "stoner dude" humor is today.

Sorry, but you can't demand that the past conform to today's standards and morals.

reply

I was just watching one of my all-time fave comedies. "Love At First Bite". No way in hell could they make something that funny today... so many cry baby groups would get their panties in a bunch!

reply

Obviously you just watch mainstream movies, or are just talking about mainstream cinema couldn't handle something life Love at First Bite. However, filmmakers like Noah Baumbach and Charlie Kaufman still take audiences to places that big time Hollywood refuses to go. Or another great example is David Lynch. A lot of people didn't know how to take the comedy in Blue Velvet and Wild at Heart (and Wild at Heart had a light hearted rape scene).

hitrecord.org

reply

No, it did not have a light-hearted rape scene. Are you insane?

reply

>>Don't forget the highly inappropriate joke about suicide in the museum.<<

The joke wasn't about suicide, it was about the fact that Allan was so desperate.

reply

Allen: "What are you doing on Saturday?"
Girl: "Committing suicide."
Allen: "How about Friday?"

You apparently mean something different.

--
Grammar:
The difference between knowing your sh**
and knowing you're sh**.

reply

We're laughing at Allan, not the woman. Thus we're laughing at his desperation, not hers.

reply

That's one of my favorite jokes in the movie. And the movie has a lot of hilarious moments.

reply

Our culture's mentality will eventually shift, and one day it may seem very strange and even offensive that joking about rape would be considered almost as awful as actual rape. There is something a bit odd about how speech is put on the same level as actual atrocities. I've never found this scene offensive, and I'm someone who really can't stand watching scenes in movies that depict rape. I'll avoid a movie for the rest of my life if I know it has a rape scene, but a the second poster said, it's realistic for the purposes the movie because people often joke about taboo subjects, quite often because of an actual fear. The other thing is just that I never watch a Woody Allen movie from the perspective of believing the characters are supposed to be role models.

-----
Reason is a pursuit, not a conclusion.

reply

That conversation made me feel a bit uncomfortable but as someone said good friends could easily have a humourous conversation on such a subject.

However there is no way that a odern mainstream movie would include such a discussion.

You're an errand boy, sent by grocery clerks, to collect a bill

reply

My memory is that it was kind of a shock-laugh at the time. But even by six years later, it played a lot differently.

reply

I agree the "rape" discussion is obsolete. Rape is not funny. I'm currently directing a community theatre version of the play and have excised the whole section. I am sure that, given the opportunity, Allen would have rewritten it. The idea is to find a way to bring discussion of sex into to conversation and for the Allan character to be confused about the signals Linda is sending. However, there are better ways to get into the convesation.
I don't quite agree with the earlier poster about the "committing suicide" line. I never get the idea, as stonefaced as the girl is, that she is really contemplating suicide. I see it as a way to blow off Allan.

reply

The discussion isn't abouth whether rape is funny, but whether joking about it is funny.

Death isn't funny either, but joking about death is.



--
Grammar:
The difference between knowing your sh**
and knowing you're sh**.

reply

I think the difference there is that rape disproportionately affects women (prison notwithstanding), and is a trauma that's an aberration from the norm. Death, on the other hand, is something we're all equally stuck with, so we might as well make light of it as best we can as a coping mechanism (though obviously, the number of other people's deaths we'll experience will vary widely).

-There is no such word as "alot."

reply

Well said. I think the conversation also just reveals, in a funny way, Allan's fear about doing something wrong ("I was nowhere near Oakland!"), as if it were on the same level as rape, and Linda's general goofiness while drinking champagne. Anyway, I think Woody writes women well in some ways, but sometimes their lines sound more like Woody talking through them (I mean, come on, what woman would say the thing about possibly enjoying rape?). This also works well in a way, because all of his movies have that quality of taking place in the Woody persona's head. We're not really getting reality, just his perception of reality.

reply

I can't defend the viewpoint, but at the same time, it was interesting to hear people who think like that... so, I would take a movie with a provocative and memorable discussion like that in it any time, over one where the characters simply spout bland platitudes.






Born when she kissed me, died when she left me, lived whilst she loved me

reply

One thing to remember about these 70s movies is that they came after a period -- decades -- of censorship at the movies (roughly 1934 to 1968, "the Hays Code") and there seemed to be a DESIRE to SHOW forbidden things(sex, nudity, ultra-violence, rape with "all of the above") and to SAY forbidden things (profanity ,but also "politically incorrect" jokes about things like rape and race). Gay characters had not been allowed to be portrayed on screen, nor gay practices shown. Now they could be.

One by one, taboos were discussed and/or shown. Male-on-male rape(Deliverance.) Incest (Chinatown.)

This made for a heady time, and a lot of movies that were not particularly "holiday entertainment for the entire family." Some of these R-rated movies were hits (MASH, Dirty Harry, Straw Dogs) , but a lot weren't. They were just kind of sickening, and audiences didn't go, and money was lost and -- soon the 80's arrived with much more teenage friendly fare.

The rape joke in Play It Again Sam is perhaps a more mild example of this "new freedom of the screen," but with its release being in 1972, it was right there in the heart of the era.

reply

"One by one, taboos were discussed and/or shown. Male-on-male rape(Deliverance.) Incest (Chinatown.)"

Great point. There are so many films of this era that would qualify for this taboo-buster list, but I'll add the notorious Private Lessons (1981) and the dreary Luna (1978).

"The rape joke in Play It Again Sam is perhaps a more mild example of this "new freedom of the screen," but with its release being in 1972, it was right there in the heart of the era."

In this context, your earlier point is very relevant. I doubt there was any hint of rape fantasies in American films prior to the 1960s at least. If there are examples I'm unaware of them. The op implied that the joke in PIAS was a product of a bygone era of pre-enlightenment, but as you say it was really something limited to the approximately 15 glorious years after the dawn of the "new Hollywood" when the inmates had more control of the asylum. Some David Lynch films like Wild at Heart (1990) probably qualify as exceptions.

reply