I am making this musical trend because I am thinking the reason this classic musical never appears on Moviechat is because so many of you hate Jews. I have seen the horrifying starements some of you have made on Roman Polanski, Woody Allen, and Harvey Weinstein.
shareAgree. Anyone who would make derogatory statements about fine moral men like Roman Polanski, Woody Allen, or Harvey Weinstein must be an anti-Semite.
Satire?
shareYou need to ask? REALY?
Strntz is one of very few remaining mature, educated and intelligent people is this cesspool.
And it is “sarcasm,” not “satire.”
Yes I asked. My sarcasm meter is broken on this website. I base my reactions to posts on the content, not the poster. So you don't need to be offended when I don't recognize the name of a person writing a short "literary work".
That said, I'm glad that there is not another person here glorifying Polanski, Allen or Weinstein.
I'm not here to defend Roman Polanski. He has enough Hollywood/film pals doing that already. But considering the crimes of some other folks who escaped punishment, his is hardly the crime of the century.
Again, not to defend him, but I have always held a soft spot for Roman Polanski because of the agony he went through in his personal life. He lost not one, but TWO families to horrific violence. First his mother, sister and unborn sibling while he was still a child. Then he lost his wife, unborn son and friends to more violence.
If I had suffered the violence he did, I might have ended up institutionalized.
Drugging and raping a child deserves prison time, no matter who you are.
shareIt was decades ago.He settled with her out of court.So let's drop it!
shareNo way. if the courts had taken a harder stance on child rapists decades ago, perhaps things might be better now. It is never too late for justice as long as the perps are still alive.
Why are you so pro-rape anyway?
I am not.I.just don't think they should still be pursuing the. Case as the original victim doesn't want to.
shareUrging that an admitted rapist should not pay for their crime is being pro-rape. It is not up the victim. So you think that if a victim is so traumatized that they do not want to press charges, then the rapist should go free?
shareDon't victims have the right to forgive?
share[–] marktayloruk (2440) 2 days ago
It was decades ago.He settled with her out of court.So let's drop it!
[–] marktayloruk (2440) a day ago
I am not.I.just don't think they should still be pursuing the. Case as the original victim doesn't want to.
[–] marktayloruk (2440) an hour ago
Don't victims have the right to forgive?
I hold no brief for.Polanski but just find prosecution for something that happened decades ago distasteful.
shareInteresting. Why don't you find rape distasteful instead?
shareI do.
share[–] marktayloruk (2443) 17 hours ago
I hold no brief for.Polanski but just find prosecution for something that happened decades ago distasteful.
No, the reason why this movie is never mentioned is, that it is not relevant, it is also a rather trashy movie with 1 catchy children's song. Not anti anything.
share