Actually, it's a bomb


Saw the movie when it came out in 1969.
I was a college freshman.
The night I saw it, I was on a date with a new girlfriend - some big things happened that night - let's just say that I was in the process of becoming an adult.
Everything clicked that night - it was magical - I had a car - I had a girl - I was in COLLEGE - and I just loved loved loved the movie.
Thought it was the greatest thing I'd ever seen on the screen.
It had entrenched itself as one of my favorite movies of all time.

I hope I've aged better than this movie.
Re-watching it for the first time in many years last night - I could not get over how awkward it actually is, how sloppy, how corny - how contrived, how dopey - how Butch and Sundance are NOT the groovy cool dudes I once thought (but they are actually robbers, murderers, and low-lifes - however much I still like Paul and Robert), how Katherine Ross's character doesn't work for me, how the montage sequences don't really work, how the music doesn't work, how pretty much EVERYTHING doesn't work.
The poor props - phony plastic looking saddles on all the horses.
Bad pacing.
No development.
This movie has no soul, stands for nothing (except putting pretty star's faces on the screen), and would best be forgotten.

I'm not saying it's a total piece of trash like some of today's pointless action hero movies - it has some entertainment value, good chemistry between the two main actors (who are, let's face it, fantastic together or apart), nice cinematography, and some good spoken lines. But a GREAT movie or even a GOOD one, it is not.

Long segments of repeated action - robbing banks, then fleeing on horseback as they are pursued by inept posses, miraculously escaping as they laugh, and then sitting in a saloon across the street from the bank they just robbed.
Keystone cops stuff.

Part comedy, part Western, part romance, part road movie, part period piece - and it works at none of them.

This was when movies started really going bad. This was not the first, but certainly a fine example of: Let's get some big stars and put them on the screen. We'll worry about what we're going to do with them at some point!

I don't say that's how it actually went, but it may have been for all the dubious content in this picture.

I had to give it 5/10.
I have to wonder now about my other unimpeachable favorites from that era:
The Graduate
The Sting
Easy Rider
Slaughterhouse Five
Midnight Cowboy
One Flew Over the Coocoo's Nest


Are they all really just turkeys?
Sorry, but Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid is a bomb.
A pleasant bomb, maybe, but a bomb nonetheless.
I don't know how it could succeed today, much less years from now, as a true classic would.

reply

Man, this flick was a gas back then, but now it's kind of a bummer. I can dig what you're saying about those saddles looking plastic... or maybe they were covered with Naugahyde for that authentic fake leather look. Even a classic western like The Magnificent Seven comes off as being a little corny now, but time keeps on slipping into the future.

reply

[deleted]

Wow, must be tough to go through life so ill informed. You cant even realize how inadequate your opinions are. I'm sorry for you.

reply

I agree for a different reason, I think this is by far the most smug movie I've ever seen.

reply

I agree, but, the Ross girl at zenith. I God's.

reply

I haven't read all the replies yet, but I have no problem with this assessment.
This film LOOKS gorgeous, as are all the lead characters.
This was a time of anti-heroes, and BCSK seems like anti-hero lite.
I think it is too well-made to completely slag off, but the OP admits that.
And there is not much wrong with enjoying a fun movie that may not have as much substance as some would like to ascribe to it.
But that one scene between Redford and Ross -- omg ! My little 10 year old eyes must have been Saucers wondering what was going to happen next. Even if she never was a classic actress, Kate Ross was a beauty.

reply

I have to also agree with the OP. While I still enjoy the chemistry between Newman and Redford, I have noticed that it isn't as great now as it was back in 1969.
It really was style over substance. I didn't realize that back then, but seeing it again today made me realize that it isn't as great as I once thought it was. It's fun. It's still a classic.....
To me? Not as great as I once thought it was.
I think that some of the people here were a bit hard on the OP. He didn't come here to complain. He simply came here with an opinion and had looked for discussion. What he got was abuse!

reply

And what he got from you and me was a calm and thoughtful conversation.
Good for all of us !

reply

Sadly, the OP will never know unless He/She finds their way to MovieChat and stumbles upon this thread. 😁

reply

Saw it too, at age 9.

reply

Good try, but no. It's a great movie, with its own (then-modern) way of doing things. The movie follows the characters as they get deeper into trouble. I didn't feel an repetitiveness like you did. Like any movie, it isn't perfect, but it does what it sets out to do very well. A "bomb" it definitely isn't. And, few share your opinion.

reply

So you say.

reply

I feel like the guy who wrote this comment was suffering from brain damage

reply