MovieChat Forums > To Kill a Mockingbird (1963) Discussion > Possibly the most over-rated film ever m...

Possibly the most over-rated film ever made.


This will cause much foaming at the mouth, I'm sure, and some people will call for the rope and demand a hangin', but I think To Kill a Mockingbird is the most over-rated, over-praised, over-evaluated, and over-esteemed film ever made.

People, it's just a hokey old B/W movie that tried to be the last gasp of the 50s, before the 60s really got going. Sentimental Pap. Formulaic, by-the-numbers mock-"Down Home" cliche.

If it hadn't had the exploitive race angle, it would have been exposed for what it is - a b-grade programmer.

reply

well, you know, that's just like, your opinion man...

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Agree. Funny that another thread calls it underrrated.

--------
My top 250: http://www.flickchart.com/Charts.aspx?user=SlackerInc&perpage=250

reply

I agree. The story is confused and widely misrepresented. I will limit myself to one contradiction.

Atticus is widely regarded as being an exemplar of an upstanding lawyer, and the film about injustice. Yet although he defends a man falsely accused of rape, he colludes with another man being let off after committing murder. How consistent, ethical or moral is that?

reply

Two questions:

1) Though it tries to be, is legal "justice" always -- "just", in an altruistic sense?

2) Does an "upstanding lawyer" (not to mention an interesting and very human character) always have to be "consistent", "ethical", and "moral" (and, by who's definition of consistency, ethics, and morality)?

(Btw, I think it was Heck Tate (it was his decision to make, not Atticus') who "let" Boo Radley "off".)

reply

[deleted]

Yes, I agree this movie is overrated but I would not call it a "B" movie. I do agree with a lot of other posts, especially the "last gasp of 50s nostalgia before the crap hit the fan with the 60s". Can't argue with Gregory Peck's performance though. He was truly one of the all-time great actors, guy could play anything. His biggest asset being his sense of realism, it didn't seem like he was acting, it seemed like he meant what he was saying. He really embodied his characters.

No eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn ..... JM

reply

[deleted]

The movie is sentimental, old fashioned, and perhaps other descriptions that define "hokey." It's an old movie, having been made more than half a century ago. But these are not synonyms for "bad." Neither is the fact that it is made in black and white.

I love this movie. I never tire of watching it, of seeing life in a sleepy Southern town through the eyes of the children. I love the drama, the relationships, the struggle of a child to understand injustice and peer pressure and to try to resist beating the crap out of a schoolmate at recess.

Scout does all this while turning to her father to help guide her through the events that she cannot possibly understand fully. She, at her age, cannot process the event (of course, non-event here) of a terrible social crime like rape, and the incredibly complex factors thrown in by race. She's watching economic, social, violent injustice and being guided through it by her loving, patient, kind, father.

I particularly like the scene where she's in bed and Atticus is reading to her; then she asks to see the watch. He hands it over with infinite patience as he has probably done many, many times before and watches her delight when he puts the watch in her hands and sees her snap it open and read the inscription. It's obviously a comforting and much anticipated bedtime ritual for Scout.

I like the way both kids watch Walter pour that syrup all over his plate of food; and the outburst Scout comes out with -- and you know when Cal calls her into the kitchen she's going to get a lecture on manners and whack on the behind -- and Atticus does not interfere with that.

Jem thinks his father is too old to do anything. He's at that age where he wants a hero for a father and instead has Atticus, an older father, a lawyer who doesn't seem to ever raise his voice, and somehow never succumbs to attempted blackmail (he won't deal with Jem to come down out of the tree). But he looks at his father in wonder when Atticus shoots the rabid dog -- could it be there are things he doesn't know yet about his father? Who knew he was a crack shot? He watches his father react with non violence when Mr. Ewing spits in his face. He watches his father's kindness and respect towards the Robinson family.

The kids are growing up with a wonderful father who teaches them the important lessons of life. How do you treat people who are poorer (or richer, for that matter)? People who are a different color? People who are in a position of authority? (Atticus teaches Scout the value of a compromise with her teacher.) How do you react when things happen that are out of your control? The child's eye view is pure and uncluttered with adult prejudices and just waiting for imprints to be made by the influential figures in their lives.

Atticus is the anchor in Scout's life. She knows she can ask him anything; that he will always answer and explain; that he is her protector, her guide, her mentor. He forbids her to fight, no matter the reason. He corrects (with Cal's help) her table manners and treatment of guests at the table (a Southern tradition that demands much grace and acceptance of guest behavior). She asks him if he defends ni**ers; and he immediately tells her not to use that word and explains himself. He's teaching her the value of people.

And while that's going on; there's the mysterious excitement of the neighbor down the street -- the delicious scariness of going as near the house as they dare -- of spreading the stories to new friends like Dill; of Jem taking the thrilling dare of dashing up on the Radley's porch to actually touch the front door and then racing away. How wonderfully exciting!!

I love the humor. I like the way Scout answers Atticus when he asks her if she knows what a compromise is; the way Jem comes home from school walking like an Egyptian and announces that they invented embalming and toilet paper.

I think that judging a movie based on a lack of modern movie-making techniques, or its age, or whether it's in black and white; is not a good way to evaluate its worth. There's nothing inherently wrong with a slow pace, with a lack of splash and explosions. It's really OK to be "hokey." A film set in the 30's, made in the early 60's, and based on a book, is not going to look or sound modern.

In addition to "hokey," I would say a major element of this film is nostalgia. Nostalgia is a road with no potholes. It's a sweet walk down memory lane, illustrated by the adult voice of Scout, narrating for us.

I don't believe this film, or the book, is overrated at all.


reply

Beautifully expressed, FoolishCarriage.

reply

I loved this movie. It is rare that a movie is as good if not better then book it depicts. It was well acted and beautifully done.

reply

[deleted]