This Movie just sucks!
Harold Hill is a total goof, the songs are horrible, and the rest of the characters are boring (except Marian perhaps). Not funny or entertaining, just annoying! Another possible candidate for worst film ever !
shareHarold Hill is a total goof, the songs are horrible, and the rest of the characters are boring (except Marian perhaps). Not funny or entertaining, just annoying! Another possible candidate for worst film ever !
share[deleted]
And once again someone attempts to 'logically' analyze what is, in fact, a lovely fantasy (and has always been one). Just enjoy for what it is and leave logical analysis for oil leaks.
shareI was twelve when this movie came out (that should give away my age). I can watch this movie four or five times a years, and I have several of the songs on my mp3 player.
My seven year old granddaughter and I are watching it now, even as I'm writing this post. She thinks the dancing and songs are 'really great'.
If an old guy like me, and nice young girl of seven can both enjoy The Music Man, then how in the world can ANYONE make a case that it sucks???
[deleted]
Harold and Marian were in love. That should explain their motivations. If not, I would recommend that you watch that beautiful love scene at the footbridge, and that should clear up your confusion. This IS a musical comedy, not "King Lear."
share[deleted]
Marian fell in love with Harold because (as the Great Hepburn once said)'he gave her s-e-x' ( didn't really, this was 1912/1957) but he had SEX APPEAL for her to respond to and she gave him roots,reality,whatever you want to call it.
Quit being so logical.
Marian fell in love with Harold because (as the Great Hepburn once said)'he gave her s-e-x' ( didn't really, this was 1912/1957) but he had SEX APPEAL for her to respond to and she gave him roots,reality,whatever you want to call it.
Yes it, was sex on BOTH of their parts, but it was also love. They both wanted and needed it badly. All you have to do is watch the beautiful love scene at the footbridge, and it is self-explanatory. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLDsLeVxOaU&feature=related However, in spite of himself, and certainly not intentionally, Harold brought joy and happiness to River City, bringing Winthrop out of his shell, and most importantly, bringing Marian out of HER shell, teaching her to love... and teaching HIMSELF to love in turn, and to discover a humanity in himself he never knew existed. He ended Marian's loneliness forever... and his OWN in the process. A very nice ending for a musical.
Dalton1962, I think you have made some very good points, but I must admit I truly love "The Music Man", Shirley Jones, Robert Preston, the Buffalo Bills, Hermione Gingold, Paul Ford and Meredith Wilson and hate Shipoopi and as a result find "The Music Man" to be my all time favorite musical and not for any esoteric or objective reasons, merely because it so pleases me especially my ears) more than any other musical I have ever seen with admittedly "My Fair Lady" a close second. I do not subscribe to the theory of objectivity in aesthetics. As a result I may abhor rock and rap and love jazz and classical with neither apology nor explanation. I dearly love the music of Richard Rogers, but please, combine it with the wonderfully imaginative lyrics of Lorenz Hart not the syrupy and semi-professional ones of Oscar Hammerstein II. It is no more necessary for me to find realism in this musical than it is to in the great yet oft toadying works of the incomparable William Shakespeare.
Only two things are actually knowable:
It is now and you are here. All else is merely a belief.
I usually love musicals and I have to agree. There just wasn't anything in this one that grabbed me. The songs seemed very mediocre to me. I even love the other classics (Sound of Music, Fiddler, etc.) but something about this one just felt bland. Maybe I need to see it on stage.
Taking back IMDB message boards....one ignored Troll at a time.
You're fortunate people didn't jump out of the computer screen and throttle you! A movie works because it plays on your mind. There is no simpler explanation than that. This movie touched every emotion it could: cynicism, the con man versus the community, the innocent versus the prey, the happy (sappy?) ending. The singing and dancing moving the story line forward. And I don't know anyone who could have played these roles better than Robert Preston (Mathew Broderick doesn't even come close in the remake), Jennifer Jones--Christine Chenowith did excellence in the remake--Hermione Gringold, Buddy Hacket... The acting was excellent all the way round. The movie presented an idealization of small town life in Iowa. In the end: what's not to like?
shareYes of course: SHIRLEY JONES the Broadway performer; not Jennifer Jones the TV sitcom star.
shareJennifer Jones the TV sitcom star.
ROTFLMAO!!! Jennifer was a MOVIE star who was never in a sitcom. She couldn't sing, either. But, catch her in "Portrait Of Jennie." Jennifer was probably pissed off, like the rest of us, that SHE wasn't on the footbridge with Preston, lol. Sniff, sniff...
OK. This is going from bad to worse. Jennifer Jones is a movie actress. Shirley Jones is the movie star who sings beautifully and performs in Carousal, Oklahoma, and The Music Man. And others, I'm sure.
So who was that actress on the TV sitcom--in the 70s? One of the episodes had something to do with yogurt whose very named seemed to her to epitomize what was disgusting about yogurt.
Like others, I respond off the top of my head. The Music Man is one of my favorite movies, I have the DVD in my collection. Responding like I did was a fairly easy mistake to make--Jones, Jennifer and Jones, Shirley. Mea Culpa, my mistake. Especially given that I had read so many items about the movie before I responded. I also tend to write in the evening--chalk it up to fatique.
When I do write something about a movie, I usually have the DVD right here in front of me, with my magnifier, to get the factoids correct. Regrettably, when I'm wrong, I'm certainly wrong!
And what in God's name is ROTFLMAO? I have seen that many times and have no idea what it means.
I do thank people for correcting me; I will probably delete my post and submit in corrected revision.
Hey, Steven don't delete your post. Anyone can make a mistake, and very few posters are mean to other posters. I do know that SHIRLEY Jones starred in the 70's sitcom "The Partridge Family," which I couldn't stand and could barely watch. And ROTFLMAO is Rolling On The Floor Laughing My Ass off. Glad to know you're a major fan of "The Music Man." I just saw it again last night for the UMPTEETH time, and STILL loved it as much as when I first saw it as a kid. Even more as an adult.
shareMany thanks for your kind words. I was half right. Prseumably this Shirley Jones is the same Shirley Jones of Carousal, Oklahoma, The Music Man. So I had the right association but the wrong name. Believe it or no I've seen only 1 episode of that program when it first came out, then I saw it again many years later and lo and behold it was the episode that I had seen many years previous.
Thanks for defining ROTFLMAO--just what my lexicon needs, one more absurdity.
I put the DVD on again this afternoon just for the pleasure of listening to the music. When news is bad all over, there's nothing wrong with a little escapism. Again, many thanks for your kind words.
Anytime Steven. Yes, the Shirley Jones of "The Partridge Family" and "The Music Man" is one and the same. She is also a terrific straight actress who won an Best Supporting Actress Oscar for playing a, get this, prostitute in "Elmer Gantry."
"The Music Man" is indeed a wonderful film for escapism, but another interesting, but rarely discussed aspect of this masterpiece, was the dark undertones, under the bubbling exterior. Some pretty heavy stuff, and relevant today, such as a charming snake oil salesman, aka con man. Harold Hill was a crook, enough said. Sexual repression of Marian, and the crippling psychological problems of Winthrop, small town intolerance, barely tolerating Marian, as they think she slept with Old Miser Madison, totally untrue, to gain control of the library books. Hill being a top-notch cocksman, probably having seduced every music teacher in 102 countries, lol. So, joyful that it was, this film also contains some very deep thought-provoking social commentary, only really understood by adults who watch the film. That's the beauty of Meredith Willson's story. He wrote a very sexy piece that the whole family can enjoy, the sleazier sexual aspects being lost on kids.... thank God.
You're right, the movie has powerful overt sexual images. When the professor sings about "Hester to just one more A" he is referring to Nathaniel Hawthorne's Scarlet Letter. In that novel, Hester had committed adultry with the local preacher, ended up with a child, Pearl, and a letter A for adultry carved on her bosom after years of wearing one on her blouse. That was a novel of the early 1800s. In the dance Shipoopee, a male dancer throws his female partner on his chest to expose her white thighs--closed to be sure--up to her underwear. That's a scene one would see at Moulin Rouge where the ladies would dance the Can Can to Offenbach's music and lift their skirts to expose their privy parts to an audience of men and women. The anvil salesman is about to expose the Professor as a roue who con's piano teachers primarily with his sexual prowess. Marian is fighting with herself to give her virginity to him--if she hadn't already given it to miser Madison. Mrs. Parou gazes upon Harold Hill at the end of the Gary Indiana sequence with what can only be described as sexual longing; Marian has this same response just before she is to meet him at the footbridge. In 1900 Theodore Dreiser had written Sister Carrie about a woman who moved from small rural town to Chicago, only to become a fallen woman. Certainly 1912 River City, Iowa would know something about fallen woman, espcially since they accuse Marian of using her sexual favors to have the books left to her. So the sexual tone is there and is not a reading into the film something that is barely there; it is there, it is explicit, it is part of the movies success.
shareA HUGE part of the success of "The Music Man," is the blatant sexuality of the piece, but tastefully done in a way that went right over the heads of kids, but that adults could perfectly understand. Nothing graphic, but THERE, with a capital "T" Meredith Willson gave credit to his audience to know what was what, even in 1957, when he wrote the original stage play. And Steve, Marian did NOT go to bed with Miser Madison, shocking the living hell out of Harold, when she called him "Uncle Maddie," who had been her father's best friend. She was NOT "the sadder but wiser girl," flabbergasting Harold, but not stopping him from his ultimate goal: to seduce Marian, at the same time realizing that she was genuine, and not doing a sexual tease. SHE DIDN'T KNOW HOW. As I said in my previous post, Marian did not know how to conduct herself with a man, and was obviously scared and inexperienced. She was TERRIFIED about going to the footbridge with Harold, as she "had never been to the footbridge with a man in my life," and was freaked out at the very thought. Hence the gentle... and gentlemanly way Harold gradually seduced her, and wound up being seduced himself. He was in love with Marian BEFORE he went to the footbridge, but could not admit it to himself. And then shock of shocks, Preston open-mouthed kissed Jones on the footbridge, NOT usual in those days, not noticed by kids, but taking adults aback. And, from a woman's point of view, Marian WAS clearly going to give her virginity to Harold anyway, and you can BET it happened after the parade, lol. She could hardly wait, and well they WERE in love. Harold would have to be extra gentle and uh, careful, but we knew he would be, judging from the tender, but intense way he gazed at her on the footbridge, and the whole tenor of his careful seduction. Again, the viewer does not get to see it, thank God. Willson left that to our imaginations. Also, when they danced the Shipoopi, ALL the dancers lifted their partners up, showing the ladies' thighs... including Harold and Marian. All of the other guys are smiling during the dance, but Harold is DEAD SERIOUS, and unsmiling, holding Marian in a very tight, sensual, but still gentlemanly embrace. We got the message, and at the end of the dance when she sits on his knee, he looked like he wanted to jump on her RIGHT THEN, lol. WHOA!!! Harold Hill was SEXY, no two ways about it. One of the sexiest characters ever put on film, even if he was a con man, Willson made his character gentle, considerate, hilarious, and someone who brought culture and joy to River City, but sexy, just the same. And Robert Preston hit this one right out of the park. And, he was one of the most magnetic, sexiest actors EVER. He was VERY sexy in this. And, many of the male posters say Shirley Jones was "yummy," and sexy, so there you have it. A very beautiful and sexy pair. And Preston was to die for in that beautiful white suit.
shareWe are on the same page here. Robert Preston is sexy in a viril sexy way; unlike Matthew Broderick who is 'pretty' as so many modern actors are 'pretty.' Leonardo DiCaprio, Charley Sheen, Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Robert Redford. etc. Paul Newman, Cary Grant were handsome in that virile handsome way. Tyrone Power was pretty. The difference between 'pretty' and 'handsome' is not to be dismissed for the (sexual) impact they have on the audience. I have yet to meet a woman who doesn't drool over Paul Newman.
In the Shipoopee dance, the director makes a point, an aesthetic decision, of having one of the girls thighs, as she is being lifted by her partner, point directly at the camera--straight on so the audience sees what is going on; not a hint at what is going on but a direct statement. (I would have to check the film again, but I'm not certain that Robert Preston and Shirley Jones are in that dance sequence; I don't beleive he lifts her off.) I might add incidentally, 1912 society may very well have adopted dance crazes developed and refined in New Orleans brothels; and the Shipoopee sequence is about new dance steps, and where would those dance steps originate but the New Orleans brothels. Just saying, just keeping it real.
The other important point is con man as psychopath or sociopath personality. Granted they have charm to the gazoos but the basis for much of that charm is this pathological element. An indifference to truth, indifference to the results on other people of their behavior, thier ability to mirror themselves to the person their conning. Sincerity, they can fake sincerity. Nobody minds the con artist who wants to tell you the earth is flat. But when the con artist (psychopath/sociopath) wants to steal your identity or your banking account... Bernie Maddow did his business for 30 years with such charm, few people were able, or willing, to see beyond what was essentially a shell game.
Did Marian give herself sexually to Miser Madison? Town folks think as much. Would Marian confess to such behavior? In real life we know people who have illegitimate children and never tell their subsequent spouses; that behavior is not the world of fiction. Miser Madison being older would of course not go the footbridge, after all, he has a certain dignity to maintain as an older man, not a randy teenager; this dignity is what would appeal to Marian.
Sex for woman has always been problematic. In those days, in that day, and still in this day. Preganancy or sexually transmitted diseases (often asymptomatic in women) are real consequences of sexual activity for women. And reality for women with multiple sexual partners is loss of value--yes, value--and subsequent marriageability . (Hence, Marian not willing to share her sexual history. She would not be the first woman to go to her marriage disguised as a virgin.)
And this is why Harold Hill as con man --psychopath/sociopath-- is so important. For him, Marian would be one more notch on his belt. He asks her toward the end of the film: "What have you heard?" Her responsse to him for accussation from the anvil saleman re Harold Hill doing 102 piano teachers--and more--suggests that she knows from Harold Hill because she herself has a compromised past. That he has fallen in real love with Marian was unanticipated by him; he comes to care for Marian and Winthrop which redeems him from being a psychopath/sociopath.
This erotic impulse of the movie provides psychological motivation for the movie. But the central moment of the film is Winthrop transformed from withdrawn to someone willing to communicate. "The Music Man" is a surprisingly dense movie--as "Road to Perdition" is dense--in a way that "West Side Story," or "Sound of Music," or even "Oklahoma" are not dense. The erotic impulse appeals [sub rosa] to the audience and plays a large part of the movie's success as an aesthetic. It's more than good music and a good story line; it is good music with an overt erotic story line.
Ah yes, Preston was sexy in a VERY virile way, very masculine, as opposed to the girly-boys of today. Women wanted to run their fingers through his rich, curly, chestnut brown hair, lol. He was not pretty but very RUGGED, and craggy, and that's where my taste in men lies. Preston was NOT the best looking man or the best built, by any means. He was constantly going up and down in weight, even when he was young, but in "The Music Man" he kept it off, thank God, and was in prime condition. And he was to die for in that beautiful white suit at the Sociable, and especially later, at the footbridge. Pres in that stunning white suit is one of the most endearing romantic, to say nothing of erotic, sexual images ever presented on screen. Few man can wear a white suit and not look utterly ridiculous, and unmanly. What set Preston apart was that that was something so gentle and sweet about him. Combine that with tremendous virility, and it's cinema magic. He was a man could show tenderness, and not be thought of as weak and unmasculine. Have you ever seen anything as gentle and moving and POETICALLY MASCULINE, as Preston in the footbridge scene? He was ill-served by DeMille in his early career.
I just resaw the film, and yes, Preston and Jones ARE in the Shipoopi segment, and he clearly DOES lift her up, as do the other dancing couples. You plainly see them, as he is the only one wearing a white suit. And it does look like a modified version of the Can-Can.
Marian did NOT give herself sexually to Miser Madison, regardless of what the whole town thought. Meredith Willson back then said she didn't, and in the novelization of the movie he made back then, he said the same thing. Shirley Jones herself has said that she didn't, and was directed to play Marian as a blushing virgin, lol, and it worked. Who are we to argue with them? And Steven ANY woman, regardless of her sexual experience, would be freaked out to learn that the man she loved had seduced every music teacher in 102 Illinois counties. But you are right about Harold redeeming himself, and he didn't even know it was happening. From the beginning, he was strangely drawn to Marian and her family. He clearly liked Mrs. Paroo, and was touched by Winthrop. Maybe in the beginning he was using them to get to Marian, but I do agree with you that he was not a psychopath in the Bernie Madoff mold. However, in spite of himself, and certainly not intentionally, Harold brought joy, culture, and happiness to River City, bringing Winthrop out of his shell, and most importantly, bringing Marian out of HER shell, teaching her to love... and teaching HIMSELF to love in turn, and to discover a humanity in himself he never knew existed. He ended Marian's loneliness forever... and his OWN in the process. All making him a candidate for redemption. There is no way you can redeeem a nutcase like Madoff.
And again, what an erotic film, beautifully and poetically done.
[deleted]
But do you really think Marian would have slept with Harold right after the parade - if they weren't married?
You do make some VERY good points. Although I was half-joking when I wrote that, I do think it was likely that they would have gotten it on RIGHT after the parade, as they couldn't wait, and even though it WAS 1912, there were still ways back then of preventing children from being made, and doubtless Harold knew ALL of them. They were both in love, which would make it different from Harold's usual conquests. It would have happened anyway if Marcellus hadn't have intervened when they were on the footbridge. And then especially after Marian had saved Harold from being tarred and feathered, and they realized how much they BOTH loved each other. Harold would have to be extra gentle and uh, careful, but we knew he would be, judging from the tender, but intense way he gazed at her on the footbridge, and the whole tenor of his gentle and careful seduction. The original play and Willson's novelization, BOTH of which I saw and read had the ending a little different than the movie. It shows Harold and Marian ALONE onstage in the empty gymnasium I think, "still locked in each other's arms," was how Willson put it, as the curtain falls.
[deleted]
Such a sweet ending - I did wonder how long they stayed in that classroom together. ;D
Long enough to get their wits about them... and then to head over to Harold's hotel room right away. I doubt they would do anything right on the gym floor, but who knows? Probably not, as Harold was not that crass, and was a sophisticated gentleman of the world. Since they had been up all night, and God, what a wild night it turned out to be, they may have just crashed unto the bed, but then when they woke up, well we know what happened. Or maybe they wouldn't have crashed immediatly, but the end result would be the same.
Harold would have had a practical reason to use contraceptives at least some of the time - given the difference in his and Marian's ages, he was likely to be the first to go, and probably wouldn't want to leave the woman he loved with too many children to look after alone.
He also wouldn't want offspring from the music teachers, AND girlfriends in the 102 Illinois counties that he seduced, to be turning up. Marian was forgiving of his past up to a point. But, little out of wedlock kids would REALLY flip her out, no doubt. Plus, God knows how many other women Harold had seduced in his over 20 years of running cons. Plus hookers, loose ladies of all kinds, and just normal women like you and me who would find Harold sexy and attractive, lol.
[deleted]
Hee - I still think they would have at least attempted to wait until marriage, as the townspeople would not be all that forgiving of extramarital shenanigans. If someone didn't spot them entering the hotel together that night, someone would have seen Marian leaving the next morning. And then she'd be right back in the rumor mill... ;D
After that wild night, I don't think Harold and Marian CARED what anybody thought, lol. Who knows, they could have also gone to an empty classroom, and locked the door, lol. Or, of course, the footbridge, oooohhh!!!! Those two were hot to trot, RIGHT THEN. Or they could have snuck over to Marcellus's, or wound up in the stable... the mind boggles, but I don't think they would haver waited, even back then.
I have met guys like Harold and loathed them too, but it doesn't mean that other women would not have found him sexy and exciting, lol. And if his sexual skill was anywhere close to we thought, well who knows WHAT we would do?
[deleted]
Speculating is half the fun. However, I don't think Harold and Marian stayed alone in the gym, "locked in each other's arms" forever. Not for long, lol. Maybe after they left the gym they could have tracked down a preacher, or maybe that A-1 Goof Mayor Shinn could have married them, with Marcellus and Ethel as best man and maid of honor, and Mrs. Shinn cutting in with her usual snide asides, lol. If not, well then nature would take its course. But one way or another, the two would have consumated their love SOONER, rather than later, MUCH sooner.
share[deleted]
If Mayor Shinn had married Harold and Marian, he would have mangled the words to the ceremony so bad, that everyone, especially his wife, would have been falling over laughing.
shareFrom looking at your postings I can see the type of films you have been watching. Please take some time to become familiar with more of the films and especially musicals from this period before you post about a style of film making you obviously know nothing about.
shareHarold Hill is a total goof, the songs are horrible, and the rest of the characters are boring (except Marian perhaps). Not funny or entertaining, just annoying! Another possible candidate for worst film ever !
In a few hundred years when cultural historians look back at the apex of America "The Music Man" will be looked at as emblematic of American character, spirit and exuberance. Yes it can seem corny to some modern audiences, but if they open up to the artistry,skill, genuine innocence and pure joy on display there is immense pleasure to be had. " The Music Man" will live on even though you think it sucks because there is something unique and amazing about it.
share