**** This contains spoilers ****
If people regard this as Britain's best film then I can only assume they have seen few British films or have a very poor opinion of the works of Hitchcock, Lean, Powell and Pressburger (and the list could go on).
I would agree that it's one of the better of a bunch of films made about this time that attempted to highlight the monotonous drudgery of the working classes (whether the working classes actually shared this view is another debate). Although I did enjoy the film, for me it was never going to be a classic, because the storyline is flawed, not something I can blame the film for, as it remains loyal to the original book - but for me, a classic film must at least be a good story well portrayed - and it fails at the first hurdle. A rebellious hero? Nope, a shiftless, unlikeable, petty criminal doing some juvenille time, given an opportunity to excel at something he has a natural aptitude for, and decides to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. It wasn't only the 'establishment' he was letting down, it was quite clear in the film that his peers, the fellow borstal inmates, were also willing him to cross the line in 1st place. I've never been happy with this ending, as it leaves us with the inescapable conclusion that our 'hero' is going to return to his life of drudgery and crime, having 'cut off his own nose to spite himself'. Don't get me wrong, I don't insist that all my favourite films must have happy endings - but this ending just leaves me shaking my head in disbelief as the character surrenders the only window of opportunity open to him - makes you wonder if 'his' story was worth the telling in the first place.
reply
share