I really don't think she was very deserving of an academy award because she was just awful. There was nothing distinguishing about her performance that we haven't seen before, and it was a really bad performance. She looked as if she went out of character at times and smiled at random times as if the scene was over when it was still rolling, like when she fled from brando's character at the dancing hall, she looked like she was smiling as she ran past the dancers. It pissed me off, she really wasn't good at all in that movie when everybody else was. I think women in early Hollywood essentially just played the same character over and over that pleas for someone to help them with awful acting and the ear piercing screams that sound phony and ridiculous. Terrible, just terrible. Actresses today are much better because not only do they not play the same damn character, but are actually playing the character well.
yeah, i don't think her performance is dating well. Brando's was timeless, but Saint's now seems to be quite over the top and amateurish. but it worked well enough in the film, i guess. cheers KZ
Brando was a great actor...No *beep* he was just a man, but he is the man whorevolutionized acting... Don't you know he is the one who started the era of the anti-heroes like James Dean, Montgomery Clift, and Paul Newman... It also marked the end of over acting and being very over the top which is very much present in older movies...
Geez, I really wouldn't have thought there'd be anybody on here criticizing Eva Marie Saint's performance, but I guess there's always a contrarian or two out there. Personally, I thought her performance was phenomenal. It is one of my favorite female performances ever and I think she more than holds her own with all of the acting heavyweights in this film. I knew she had won the Best Supporting Actress before I'd ever seen the film and when I did see it, I was surprised by just how much of a role she had and how she was really a lead. I read that Sam Spiegel wanted her to be considered for Best Supporting Actress because it would help her chances of being nominated. It was her film debut after all. So there's probably some truth to the idea that this way she was able to win the Best Supporting Actress Oscar as opposed to being nominated for Best Actress and losing, but still, she deserved to be recognized as a lead for this role.
I'm afraid you were blinded a little by all the hype about her Academy Award to which you were exposed before actually watching the movie. And I don't mean to be patronizing you: It has happened a few times to me, too, I must confess. And I changed my mind on a few occasions after getting rid of some preconception (good or bad)about a movie (or a book or a music album or any artistic event for that matter. And when it happened to me, I was genuinely happy (or sorry) to realize how wrong I had been. Those experiences helped me to forge a better judgment and to become better aware of the risks of being wrongly influenced. There are true gems lying out there for anyone once you overcome undeserved hype or blasting. And the best things are often the most overlooked.... without elitism being meant here.
It's always harder to get a genuine appreciation of a movie when you read or hear words like "blockbuster", "Oscar-worthy", "unanimous" , "best ever" prior to watching it. There is no such thing as objectivity in art critique, but yet, there is more or less subjectivity, and preconceived opinions abound and can thwart the full and actual experience of watching a movie.
Eva Marie Saint's Award for THAT performance is just plain wrong, regardless of how better she played afterward (cf. her pleasant contribution to "North By Northwest", for instance). The LAST criterion one should use to forge oneself an idea about a movie before seeing it is whether it received an Oscar, any Oscar. Even far behind whether Roger Ebert liked it. Take 1998. "Shakespeare in Love", Best Movie? Over "Saving Private Ryan"? There were dozens of other films better than this cartoonish, cretinizing fantasy whose best asset is Gwyneth's wonderful eyes and smile. But behind the scenes, a lot happens, and Shakespeare would have found excellent subject matter for a cynical comedy, perhaps...as a revenge to save his name from being associated to such a numbing farce.
Don't you know he is the one who started the era of the anti-heroes like James Dean, Montgomery Clift, and Paul Newman...
Brando initiated a certain vein of acting, but anti-heroic figures had preceded him, especially in the form of James Cagney and Humphrey Bogart. Even in the Western, John Wayne and Jimmy Stewart had played darker figures before Brando became a big star. Moreover, Clift predated Brando by a few years.
I wouldn't say that Brando (or Clift, or Dean, or Newman in his younger years) specialized in playing anti-heroes, so much as tortured heroes. In On the Waterfront, for example, the viewer sympathizes with and roots for the Brando character all the way. Even when he does wrong, he does so more because he has been misled and manipulated by the people and environment around him. Rather, Brando brought a certain level of human vulnerability, doubt, guilt, introspection, and despondency to the screen, reducing the mythic nature of performance to something more intimate and palpably realistic.
Full-fledged anti-heroism, in my opinion, did not emerge until the mid-1960s with Clint Eastwood, Sean Connery, Steve McQueen, and Lee Marvin (and sometimes a somewhat older, hardened Paul Newman). They acted with the classical confidence of heroes, but without the mores and manners.
reply share
As for Eva Marie Saint, one can sometimes tell in On the Waterfront that she is making her film debut, but her fresh-faced innocence and pale blonde looks effectively serve their purpose. She's more memorable than excellent, perhaps, but sometimes, being memorable is more important.
I too think her delicate beauty cinched her nomination and today anyone on IMDb knows that power politics within the Hollywood film industry often determines nominations and wins.
Today middle names in many fields are almost mandatory and Eva Marie Saint seemed an early progenitor. Orchestral conductors today are all now three name stars for mainly arch reasons.
There's nothing wrong with appreciating Brando's peerless acting. Nor is there anything wrong with being a "Kennedy-lover". Arthur Kennedy was also one of America's premier actors. It's unfortunate that many of today's actors lack their skill.
I thought Eva Marie Saint hammed up the scene after her brother was thrown off the roof when she screamed "stay away from him" three times. In the movie "Grand Prix" in 1966 she overacted in a similar fashion during a scene after her racedriver/love interest was killed in a crash. must be her method, but I felt she overdid both of those scenes "It's great to be me"
I watched OTW tonight and completely agree that EMS smiled at inappropriate times--especially in one scene which unfortunately, I can't pinpoint at the moment! I think it was when Marlon Brando left her at the house to go and find his brother's body--all I could think was, "Why on earth is she SMILING like that?!" I never noticed this before (and I've seen the film many times).
To the original poster: Since Ms. Saint was so amateurish and awful, who would you have preferred in the role? And you can't cheat by naming a modern actress. You have to choose someone who would've been working in 1953-54. Could be anyone from Jean Peters to Jeanne Crain to Jean Simmons.
"We're fighting for this woman's honor, which is more than she ever did."
I thought she was excellent and and my favorite Supporting Actress winner of all time.
She was totally believable in every scene.Her screaming when seeing her brother's body rang true. Since she was a Catholic school girl,she really captured that shy,nervous quality in scenes such as the glove scene in the park with Brando and the first drink at a bar.
I really can't find a bad thing to say about her performance. I think people are nitpicking when they complain about her.
I just didn't buy her as the working class girl who made it out but couldn't really leave her roots. She seemed like she never would have had those ties in the first place, lots of Catholic school or not.