drystyx (Thu Dec 10 2009 12:24:29)
Actually, Ida was the weakest part of the film. The others were great, but she stank. But then she had the only poorly written part. The other characters were all very believable, whereas her "psycho" character was just too poorly written to be believable.
dockbennett (Tue Mar 23 2010 14:55:19)
I have to agree with drystyx on this. I thought Lupino was the only real flaw in the film, as she was just too melodramatic.
I guess there are some rare occasions when actors can be accused of being too melodramatic. This might be one of them but, in my opinion, it is not. It would have had the performances of the other actors not been up there close to her and the story roll along at an exciting pace.
I'm thinking of another film that I happened to have watched recently called
Dark Passage (1947)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0039302/. In that film Agnes Moorehead
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001547/ put in a very melodramatic performance; she was brilliant. Unfortunately none the other actors performed anywhere near as good which made her acting look too melodramatic. Also, the story in
Dark Passage was way too slow and full of holes.
They Drive by Night, however, is generally better all round which is why Ida Lupina's performance shouldn't be looked on as too melodramatic. It seemed to me that Lupina was trying to act like Bette Davis: over the top. Her character required a cold and dynamic performance culminating in a crazy climax that brought on nothing other than pity from the other characters for her sickness. How could Lupina have been anything other than melodramatic?
8/10 Very Good.
reply
share