[deleted]

Only nutcase I see 'round here is you, boy.

Conspiracy Nut Case! Three sites are conspiracy: GR, USC, and larouche. The BBC article simply suggests four of the hijackers used fake ID. The Guardian was reviewing a Nut Case book.

The PNAC document calling for the destruction of Iraq and Afghanistan was written by 12 dual-citizen Jewish neocons. They were the ones with the motive for 9/11. Also Democrat Larry Silverstein who owned those asbestos-filled towers took out a double insurance policy against "terrorism", a first of its kind. He didn't show up for work that day, for the first time ever, in decades. Then there were the "dancing Israelis" who just happened to be filming the whole thing. They turned out to be Mossad agents who were running a fake moving company as a front. The building itself was being rented out by Israeli art students, none of them present in the bombing.

Maybe an even bigger clue is who was responsible for the WMDs in Iraq lie. That was the New York Times and other liberal media journalists. This is not a "conservative" issue.

Mohammad Atta was the Egyptian dickhead that flew AA 11 into the North tower.

You know, sometimes I too also think it was an inside job. The fast collapse of the tower as if done by demolition instead of toppling over to one side, the air force on stand down, Building 7 collapsing when it wasn't even hit by planes... The fact they were able to get knives and nades/pipe bombs on the plane. Don't forget that the US has had numerous suicide bombings in the past during the 1990's and before as well. Don't they have think tanks that think of these things to prevent such causes from happening such as potential airplane hijacking? Pretty sure they do... Too many conspiracy theories.

You look tense. Take two of these and don't call me in the morning. The orderlies will see to your soft-walled room and very safe pajamas.