MovieChat Forums > Dylan Mulvaney Discussion > Who is trans star Dylan Mulvaney — and w...

Who is trans star Dylan Mulvaney — and why is she suddenly everywhere?

posted 2 years ago by Satan2016 (26177)
30 replies | jump to latest

https://nypost.com/2023/04/06/inside-trans-star-dylan-mulvaneys-life-of-san-diego-privilege/

Dylan Mulvaney 26, who transitioned from male to female during beginning in March 2021, has reportedly earned more than a million dollars from endorsements including fashion and beauty brands Kate Spade, Ulta Beauty, Haus Labs and CeraVe, as well as Crest and InstaCart. She’s also gained 10 million followers on TikTok.

In March, she appeared on “The Drew Barrymore Show,” where the star famously knelt before Mulvaney and embraced her, and Mulvaney met with President Biden at the White House last fall.

Mulvaney has capitalized on the popularity of TikTok as well as companies wanting to broadcast diversity. She comes from a privileged background, and uses a high-powered Hollywood team to push her brand.

Dylan Mulvaney’s partnership with Bud Light as a brand ambassador apparently inspired Kid Rock to shoot up cases of the beer on Twitter in anger.

Dylan’s father James Jr., one of Mulvaney Sr.’s seven children with his wife, Ruth, is a San Diego-area philanthropist known for baking and handing out cookies all the time — for free.

Dylan’s uncle, Brian Mulvaney, told The Post Tuesday that the family “loves her.”

“We always knew she was gay,” he said. “She comes from a good family who loves and supports her. She really loved her grandmother who completely supported her.”

Companies like Anheuser-Busch, which owns Bud Light, are among many firms — from Pfizer to Coca-Cola — who endorse influencers from so-called marginalized communities in order to score well on something called the CEI, or Corporate Equality Index.

The CEI is overseen by the controversial and influential Human Rights Campaign, which lobbies for the LBGTQ+ community, particularly transgender people.

[–] Trev (970) 2 years ago

I still don't understand the hate for Bud Light.

-Bud Light supports Trans people
-People hate trans
-Boycott Bud Light

Is that right?

[–] Satan2016 (26177) 2 years ago

No, Anheuser-Busch is virtue signaling to appease the Woke Mob. Mulvaney is making a fortune.

[–] maximmm (3405) 2 years ago

Remember Gillette's toxic masculinity campaign?
If you still don't get the narrative and why it basically gaslights the very consumers of these corporations - then you are a bit thick skulled.

[–] HarveyManFredSin (4877) 2 years ago

Is it the same thing?

I can understand why an attack on 'toxic masculinity' might be seen as gaslighting the very people who specifically buy Gillette razors, but which Bus Light consumers are these ads attacking?

[–] maximmm (3405) 2 years ago

I'll explain.

From what I gather, the average bud light drinker was a conservative working man. Those are also the ones who oppose the new narratives which proclaim that it's ok for kids to be transed if 'they choose to' and that we don't know what a woman is because biology suddenly died in the new normal.

Analogy:
It's like selling gadgets to scientists who know shit and who are the primary target of the said gadget and then featuring a flat earther in the next ad because those gadget creators want the flat earthers to also buy the gadget. Scientists might rethink purchasing from that company because it has now embraced something that scientists are deeply opposed to. In fact, pushing the flat earth theory is gaslighting in itself - making a flat earther the new spokesperson for the company is gaslighting of the highest caliber.

[–] asom (6892) 2 years ago

Have you seen his videos? They are basically a mockery of what a woman and what femininity is …

[–] samoanjoes (58533) 2 years ago

No, it's wrong.

Dylan Mulvaney is openly mocking women. There are videos of him that he makes for TikTok where he is lying on a bed complaining about period cramps. Obviously he can't get a period, so for him to mock something that women struggle with is immature and offensive.

[–] Stratego (31059) 2 years ago

I've been reading articles about people complaining he mocks women, but these articles never provide an example. Thanks, now I know the guy's disgusting.

[–] samoanjoes (58533) 2 years ago

This guy even did a high heel running test to show that he can do it. There's another video of him in a park and a butterfly or something like that flies near him and he screams like a girl and tries to run away.

[–] Stratego (31059) 2 years ago

So he posts videos of himself acting out female stereotypes? Who actually watches that shit?

[–] samoanjoes (58533) 2 years ago

People who are so inclusive that they'll believe anything. Honestly I feel bad for trans people who feel they're a different gender but know that they are not actually that gender. People like this Dylan guy give trans people a bad name.

[–] liscarkat (19395) 2 years ago

This dude is doing his womanface act, and we're supposed to celebrate how fabulous it all is and pretend he's actually a woman. It's just insulting to actual women. He mocks women even more than Bud Light mocks real beer.

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

If you don't understand the hate for Bud Light then you've obviously never drank Bud Light.

[–] liscarkat (19395) 2 years ago

Exactly. Whether or not they put this weirdo in their ads, I wouldn't drink that dog piss anyway. I actually like beer.

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

*he.

[–] liscarkat (19395) 2 years ago

Precisely.

[–] whynotwriteme (7811) 2 years ago

Probably a psy-op by our Leftist controllers to suck more clueless Gen Zers into the penis-chopping trend that's sweeping the nation.

[–] HarveyManFredSin (4877) 2 years ago

We're not lemmings. We have a mind of our own. People don't 'chop off their penis' because others are doing so.

[–] whynotwriteme (7811) 2 years ago

Seems suspicious though about the huge rise in numbers since all this has been front and center in the media.

[–] thingmakersback (1442) 2 years ago

I suspect that the "trend" is mostly because the relatively small percentage of the male population who have probably always suffered "gender dysphoria", now are seeing the option to do something about it. And the medical profession is more likely now to see their problem as soluble - by surgery and hormones - rather than treating them with always shaky and questionable psychological techniques.

In other times and other cultures, there has been a place for men who are distinctly feminine. In ours, it seems, for now at least, that the best bet these persons have is to become women, to the extent that it is possible.

[–] liscarkat (19395) 2 years ago

Yes, there have always been effeminate men--guys like Truman Capote, or David Bowie in certain periods--but there was never any doubt they were men, albeit gay or bisexual.

As for "becoming women", that is not possible. Even at the most extreme, it's still just a dude who took hormones and paid to get his junk amputated. These people need psychological help. Someday, what's going on now will be regarded as more misguided and horrifying than the lobotomies of the 1950s are regarded today.

[–] thingmakersback (1442) 2 years ago

I doubt that the overall trend to support trans persons attempting to assume what is, for them, a more natural and comfortable identity, will be regarded in the same light as the coerced use of crude psychosurgery.

I do suspect that attitudes of horror at people using available techniques to alter their own gender will be regarded as grotesque and misguided...

[–] HarveyManFredSin (4877) 2 years ago

So, it's a person of privilege benefitting from their socioeconomic privilege and connections? Same old. Same old. Whether one is a woman, gay, trans, Black, Jewish or Muslim, if you've got a rich mommy and daddy, you'll be sorted, no matter what.

I'm militantly pro-trans rights, as I am pro-gay, women's and minority rights, but let there be NO mistake, the REAL oppression is always, ALWAYS, socioeconomic.

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (13134) 2 years ago

“We always knew she was gay,” he said.

She's not "gay". Is she a lesbian? Or are they saying she's a man who likes men?

Wait a second! If she's not a man and she's a woman then she's not gay, right?

Conundrum much?

The LGB don't want her, whatever it is.

[–] liscarkat (19395) 2 years ago

She's not even she. It's he. He and only he, now and forever.

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (13134) 2 years ago

I think most rational people can accept there are "trans" people with gender confusion who want to be called "she" and in a civil society most of us don't have a problem with that.

I have a problem equating her "struggle" with that of gays, lesbians and bisexuals.

I also can accept her as a type or a subset of women, but not a "100% woman".

There's a difference between biological sex and gender roles.

[–] asom (6892) 2 years ago

Exactly, gender roles, not gender. Gender is sex. Period.

[–] strntz (12773) 2 years ago

I think most rational people can accept there are "trans" people with gender confusion who want to be called "she" and in a civil society most of us don't have a problem with that.

I agree with that, but where I diverge is when I am asked to refer to someone like Mulvaney as a "she".

He's not, he never will be a female. He will always be a male. If he wants to cavort around pretending he's a she, that's fine, just don't expect me to say it.

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (13134) 2 years ago

Well "she" does look like a skinny ugly girl with no breasts. More female looking than male. So I have no problem calling it a "she".

Though you may be right and Mulvaney is not really trans, just playing a character.

[–] darkpast (9021) 2 years ago

that's a rough 26 , lol