A resurfaced racist tweet.

Unabashed would be the better word. I'm not proud my race won the evolutionary race. I didnt do anything to achieve that. But I'm not going to deny it, or pretend everyone is equal. The genders certainly aren't, the science and history back that and it does the same for race. It's stupid to play this game anymore. The whole problem with society is people not knowing and accepting their role and station in life (out of pure jealousy and greed). Smarter, more capable people will have better things, and not screw up as much. That's the way it will ALWAYS be. It's not from oppression or racism but these lower developed people use that to justify their violent nature that forms from the bitterness and frustration of a) thinking they are equal and b) failing miserably when they try to do things they cant, like pass a test in school, or read, or speak proper english, or go their whole life without trying to get high.

It's hilariously destructive seeing so many people be anti-racism, when for thousands of centuries, before a pozzed media was a thing, every knew NO ONE was equal and EVERYONE was racist. Now everyone is upset over something that cant be changed, like petulant children. It's so funny.

reply share

add reply

formatting help

some people think it's murder

It is.

thers think it isn't because it isn't a fully formed baby

All fetuses become humans, though, so it's technically premeditated murder.

At what point do you define an unborn baby NOT a human? Some people say if it doesn't have a heartbeat then it's not human. Does that mean if someone's heart stops working they, too, no longer maintain humanhood?

As another example, does it mean if a building only has its foundations laid but is not fully constructed that it's not a real property, or that property laws don't exist for it even if it's just a foundation?

Procreation for humans is kind of a one-and-done deal, either a baby is formed or it's not. There's no such thing as a baby NOT being a human because you don't recognize the integrity of its physiological development. In some ways that's a cruel and inhumane viewpoint.

It really depends on how you personally feel.

No, this is where Leftists have re-framed the argument. They call it "pro-choice" instead of "pro-abortion". Why? The act is an abortion, why not just call it that? Even they know it sounds wrong, so that's why they never call it "abortion rights", they call it "a woman's choice".

Now this isn't to say that people SHOULDN'T have a choice in abortions. They can, if they want.
But hiding behind wordplay and euphemisms shows just how dishonest the pro-abortion camp is.

You want to murder babies? Fine. They haven't achieved national citizenship yet, so they technically don't have inalienable rights. Just don't mask what the action is: killing an unborn baby.

reply share

add reply

formatting help