She is a terrible person

Ok, if you insist that economically the fascists are "extreme right" then we stop here.

There is no point in continuing because you don't know the basics on what the right-left economic scale means and neither of us will convince the other.

"The right believes in free markets, the righter you go, the more the views tend toward “laissez faire”. The view here is that markets are the most efficient allocators of resources, and that as prosperity increases, the benefits will flow down to poorer levels. There is also a corollary belief that the poor are that way because of their own fault, and if they will just gird up and work hard, their lot will improve."

There is NO WAY fascist are a right wing.

"The left believes in monitored markets, in higher taxation to raise money for doing social welfare, in forced percolation of economic and social benefits down the ladder. The extreme left is the kind of socialism we saw in USSR and Mao’s China where the govt owned all the assets, and the ideal was “from each according to his/her ability, to each according to his/her needs”. But it was a remote government that decided abilities and needs."

This is LITERALLY fascism.

"The economic (left–right) axis measures one's opinion of how the economy should be run: "left" is defined as the desire for the economy to be run by a cooperative collective agency, which can mean the state but also a network of communes, while "right" is defined as the desire for the economy to be left to the devices of competing individuals and organizations."

Again, there is NO WAY that fascism is to the right on the economic scale.

"This is most economic systems"

wrong, only fascism and socialism enforced that level of control of the state on the economy.

Read a bit more on fascism, do it yourself, not just from biased sources.

And btw, most economic systems can be placed on the scale to the left or to the right of the center.

Fascism is economically to the left, plain and simple.

"the first 8 read like a nationalist, right wingers wet dream."

And that's a problem with your assessment (and the academia).

USSR, China, NK, most socialist countries were actually VERY nationalist.

Read on those and how they treated minorities and other nations, like Ukrainians, Moldavians, etc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deportation_of_the_Crimean_Tatars

So based on that is the USSR right wing?

Is North Korea right wing?

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0193723509350609?journalCode=jssa

And btw, somehow NK's Juche is framed by a lot of people as ... fascism.

"Juche has been described by critics as a nationalist ideology and a departure from Marxist–Leninist principles. B. R. Myers, Michael J. Seth, and Max Fisher go further and argue that Juche has more in common with Japanese fascism and ultranationalism than Marxism–Leninism."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_nationalism

"Stalin's policies established a clear shift to Russian nationalism, starting from the idea that Russians were "first among equals" in the Soviet Union, escalating through the "nationalities deportations". According to scholar Jon K. Chang, the Bolsheviks "never made a clean break from Tsarist-era nationalist, populist and primordialist beliefs".  Russian historian Andrei Savin stated that Stalin's policy shifted away from internationalism towards National Bolshevism in the 1930s."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Bolshevism

So a left wing regime becomes "right wing" if it's nationalist? Can you see the problem with that approach?

https://www.democratic-erosion.com/2022/03/07/romanias-pds-and-pnl-a-marriage-of-convenience/

"Another thing to consider is since the PSD has an extensive history of corruption and intense nationalistic behaviors, giving them more power is a risk. They could very easily slip back into their old patterns and erode democracy through election fraud and other forms of corruption as they had done in the past."

PSD in Romania IS a left wing party AND a LOT of their members are ex-members of the communist party. And still ... nationalistic behavior? That would make them extreme right wing in your view?

The problem is mainly that the right-left concept is very muddied and incomplete and has changed over time, the spectrum needs at least 3 axes. Like economic, social issues, authoritarianism, nationalism.

Because using nationalism to decide that a regime is "right wing" would make EVERYONE right wing.

So, no, you are wrong asserting that nationalism automatically makes a regime "right wing".

"these points were not enacted in anyway. the term PRIVATIZATION was in fact invented for what the nazis did in the late 1920s when they literally sold off almost all government control in industries to private sector."

"Privatization" was NOT in the 1920s. They were not even in power in the 20s.

Was mid 30s. And those privatized were still under the control of the state, they didn't sell the control, as you said, but the "rights of property" while maintaining control.

Privatization was mainly after the initial nationalization because the government was broke and needed money.

"Shortly after the Nazi regime took power on 30 January 1933, Junkers-Motorenbau GmbH and Junkers-Flugzeugwerk AG became the objects of the new “Reichskommissar für Luftfahrt” (Reich Commissioner for Aviation), Hermann Göring, whose employment Junkers had rejected ten years earlier. Put under great pressure, Hugo Junkers had to hand over the majority of the remaining company to the German Reich in 1933. Junkers was banned from the house and the city and had to leave Dessau. Hugo Junkers died on 3 February 1935 at age 76.

In 1936 the companies were merged to form Junkers Flugzeug- und Motorenwerke AG. The aircraft that were later used in the war from 1939 onwards – such as the Ju 87 or Ju 88 – were built under state control; with their smooth fuselage construction they had nothing in common with the design that Junkers had coined and cannot be attributed to him."

Privatization, eh?

You've been fed lies ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKIYuOxxZWs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLHG4IfYE1w

This guy says is perfectly: Hitler socialism is a socialism base on race, Marxism is based on class.

Hopefully if you watch those 2 videos you will understand. He provides a lot of relevant information and sources.

If you still disagree we should stop here. Good night.