For years and years, Leftists have been saying that America is inherently, systemically racist and sexist.
Tell me, where's the path to victory for a woman of color in a country like that?
the path of victory is up to the Deep State. Joe never left his basement and still somehow won.
whether it was Joe or Kamelturd. honestly, I dont think Trump will win. but I hope I am wrong.
Agreed. There is no way the country is 50/50. It’s 65/35 MAGA, but when you rig elections, you rig them enough to win. The margin of victory isn’t important.
You’re not going to rig a 61% victory. Like Nixon received from the American people in his reelection.
US elections have been rigged since the 90s. CA leads the way.
I think this election would be too hard to rig, especially with all the heightened scrutiny from the last election. Plus, from what I am hearing, voter trends are solidly going in Trump's favor. If it were more of a toss-up election with it coming down to one or two states, then I imagine that would be much easier to manipulate.
share65/35 MAGA?! Oh wow, it's really clear that you are in a bubble, only watching media that agrees with you. you should step outside of it and get some perspective.
At least look up some actual, verified facts.
what are the verified facts? we live a in liberal bubble these days as the mainstream news/talk shows/hate night tv is all democrats. supposedly the best choice was Joe but then Trump broke his brain and now its Kamelturd who polled last in the 2020 election.
our only and best choice to save America is President Donald J Trump.
Like I said, you only believe people that agree with you.
shareand you only believe what the main stream news tells you. all the major news outlets are liberal except for Fox news. its like during the debates when the moderators fact checked Trump but not Joe or Kameltoe.
shareNo I don't. I listen to both sides. The moderators fact checked Trump because his lies were much more blatant and dangerous. Her lies required some research.
shareboth sides just say the opposite of each other, so how do we know what is the truth? I would say Kameltoes and Joes lies are way worse and both are a threat to democracy. but when you have every news outlet that covers for them, who are you going to believe?
shareThe truth is easy when you have all of the information.
Let's take Trump's lie that the Haitian immigrants are eating people's cats and dogs in Springfield, Ohio.
How do we tell if that is the truth or a lie? First we look for police reports and local officials from Springfield. City officials have confirmed that there have been “no credible reports" that this has actually happened.
So then we try to look for where the claim came from, The claim appears to have come from a number of different sources.
A claim about a cat being killed by Haitian immigrants was made on a Facebook post focusing on crime in Springfield, and attributed by the poster to the friend of a neighbour’s daughter. We know how that works. There is nothing to back that up but it was spread on social media.
A local resident in Springfield who described himself as a 'social media influencer' at Springfield’s city commission gave a speech where he accused the immigrants of taking ducks from the park and eating them. Of which there is no evidence and no one to corroborate this claim.
It wasn't just American media that investigated these claims the BBC also had their own investigation which couldn't find any evidence of these things happening.
A woman who was arrested for killing and eating a cat circulated online. Right-wing commentators referred to the woman as Haitian and pointed to the report as evidence for the baseless claim that Haitian immigrants have been engaged in similar activity. However, the incident took place in Canton, Ohio about 170 miles away from Springfield. The woman was a US citizen.
There were numerous false claims spread online about the Haitian immigrants. Influential people like Elon Musk posted memes referring to the baseless claims which have been viewed millions of times. Charlie Kirk reported it as though it was a fact. An AI-generated image of Trump hugging a duck and a cat with the caption “Protect our ducks and kittens in Ohio!” was seen 70 million times!
Drive around the Democrat strong hold of CA. Kamala’s homeland. Support for Trump is 20:1.
The country is not 50/50.
The only places Democrats win are cities where they control voting precincts and vote counting. You know the ones whose windows are covered up once the counting starts.
There’s a Simple Reason Workers Covered Windows at a Detroit Vote-Counting Site:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/05/technology/michigan-election-ballot-counting.html
Back in 2008, I thought American was too racist to elect a black president; I was wrong.
The path to victory is, in part, electing the non-white and the female candidates. Duh.
But if America is honestly as racist and sexist as the Leftists have been claiming, how can she get enough votes? I mean, not only is she black, she is also Indian and a woman. Obama was only half-black and he came across as one of those (pre-bitch-slapping) Will Smith/Sidney Poitier style polished, educated blacks that white people dig.
Kamala's running for President of a country that the Democrats and BLM see as little better than South Africa and fundamentalist Islamic nations as far as treatment of blacks and women. She doesn't come across even a fraction as erudite and articulate as Obama did.
Either she loses or her victory proves that the Left's claims of modern American systemic racism and sexism are sensationalized bunk.
Because the vote is cast by actual people many of which are poor and non-white.
The people who have the most power and influence in this country are white men so naturally they would have skewed views about women and minorities. This is not entirely their fault, when you grow up and or are surrounded by privilege you have very little perspective on what it is like to be at the other end of the spectrum.
It's a good question. I understand why you were confused.
[–] whynotwriteme (7652) 18 hours agoVP Kamala Harris loves Venn diagrams. You should use some data plotted using such a diagram and see that there is more than enough space where Racist and Non-Racist, Sexist and Non-Sexist, Rich and Poor, are able to Co-Exist but not equally in unequal numbers.
But if America is honestly as racist and sexist as the Leftists have been claiming, how can she get enough votes?
I mean, not only is she black, she is also Indian and a woman.Darn all she is missing was a handicap. Am I right?!! 🤣 Or maybe a veteran?
Obama was only half-black and he came across as one of those (pre-bitch-slapping) Will Smith/Sidney Poitier style polished, educated blacks that white people dig.Did President Obama present that way? I thought for you he was Gay. 🤔
Kamala's running for President of a country that the Democrats and BLM see as little better than South Africa and fundamentalist Islamic nations as far as treatment of blacks and women.That statement REALLY would make people think that you are NOT from the USofA and have never voted in any election. BLM is NOT a political force or entity in the USofA. You can’t quote a single Democrat that has any policies or statements that speak to South Africa. 🤣🤣
She doesn't come across even a fraction as erudite and articulate as Obama did.Cool story bro. 1st point, I would venture to guess that the Well-Spoken and Articulate Barack Obama would NEVER had gotten your vote, if you COULD vote. 2nd point, VP Harris is MILES ahead of eloquence, passion, articulation, compassion, empathy than DJT. 3rd point, VP Harris is running against DJT and NOT Barack Obama. 🫡
Either she loses or her victory proves that the Left's claims of modern American systemic racism and sexism are sensationalized bunk.Trying to negotiate the terms of a DJT loss are we now? Post the election and then RE-election of Barack Obama to the presidency of the USofA you said this was a Post-Racist society. Rather than elect SOS Clinton many Republicans thought that a reality TV show and validated Racist (DJT) would make a good counter to former President Obama.
You can throw out all the obfuscation and complication you like. That doesn't change the fact that if America was really as hideous and racist and sexist as the Left wants us to think, Kamala Harris would not even be on the ticket for President and certainly would have no chance of victory.
share[–] whynotwriteme (7656) 32 minutes agoYou're going to have to detail the obfuscation because other gentle readers wouldn't agree with you. Unlike your Dear Leader DJT, I am a much better purveyor of truth and fact.
You can throw out all the obfuscation and complication you like.
That doesn't change the fact that if America was really as hideous and racist and sexist as the Left wants us to think,The so-called "Left" isn't trying to get you to "Think" anything. What America WAS and IS are two different aspects of growth, progress, and history. You'd know that if you lived and voted in the USofA.
Kamala Harris would not even be on the ticket for President and certainly would have no chance of victory.Your dystopian distortions of others and America are unfortunate.
You may have a point there.
shareI think you are confusing systemic racism with individual racism. Harris could receive 99% of the vote, and that wouldn't change the fact that the United States very much suffers from systematic racism and sexism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institutional_racism
Institutional racism, also known as systemic racism, is a form of institutional discrimination based on race or ethnic group and can include policies and practices that exist throughout a whole society or organization that result in and support a continued unfair advantage to some people and unfair or harmful treatment of others. It manifests as discrimination in areas such as criminal justice, employment, housing, healthcare, education and political representation.[1]
posted 20 hours ago by whynotwriteme (7652)Dear whynotwriteme, wouldn't identity consumed voters be a portion of that base of "Americans"?
12 replies | jump to latest
For years and years, Leftists have been saying that America is inherently, systemically racist and sexist.
Tell me, where's the path to victory for a woman of color in a country like that?Uhhhh, wouldn't more of them thar Identity-based Single-Issue voters outnumbering the Racist, Sexist, and their Systemic Racist systems be a road to victory? share
Uhhh, if there are MORE of them thar, and they do have the ability to choose the leadership in a vote, then how can the country be considered racist and sexist?
Wouldn't a truly racist and sexist country limit or restrict their ability to vote (and NOT just by insisting on voter ID, which is only common sense.)
[–] whynotwriteme (7655) an hour agoYes injustice anywhere is injustice everywhere, but Racism is not of itself illegal; except where delineated in the law. America and even South Africa are better now than it was 50 years ago but some pockets of systemic racism, attitudes, behaviors,etc, still remain.
Uhhh, if there are MORE of them thar, and they do have the ability to choose the leadership in a vote, then how can the country be considered racist and sexist?
Wouldn't a truly racist and sexist country limit or restrict their ability to vote (and NOT just by insisting on voter ID, which is only common sense.)You are making a pretty ill-conceived statement. Let's start with the Constitution, Democracy, and self-governance, all which you fail to consider.
It's not the entire country that is racist and sexist. It's the people in powerful positions who tend to be racist and sexist.
shareThe democrats do not care if they win or lose, they have no skin in the game
share