I'm not American, so I haven't heard much about her over the past few years. Actually, I didn't know she existed until very recently. All I know about her is that she seems to strongly favour Israel and eating Doritos.
So what are her guiding principles? Where is she politically and economically? Does she have any favourite policy areas?
She's a puppet and plaything of the mega rich. Like most American politicians, she doesn't have any principles. She's best known for keeping prisoners locked up past their sentences to pad the prison labor system, and keeping an innocent man on death row until the court ordered her to release the evidence that would exonerate him. Oh, and also having sex with Willy Brown, who promoted her for it and gave her a BMW.
shareWell, she started her career in the 90s by sleeping with San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown (an ugly, fat, bald, married black man), got the job of being Attorney General of California from sleeping with other politicians in the California Senate, rather than getting an actual law degree (and the term "general" in this case means she was just the top "lawyer" for California, not a "queen" like she thought the role was). Only reason she became VP was because Joe was ordered to take a nonwhite woman as a running mate, and the list was very short. They've kept her out of the limelight for a reason: she's an even bigger idiot than Joe, and that's hard to do.
She's terrible at communicating publicly and is constantly changing her stance on everything. Either she's not good at staying consistent, or she's making the extreme mistake of trying to please everyone she can get brownie points from. Either that, or her mind is muddled from all the pot she has smoked at elite parties while it was still illegal, and laughing about putting a lot of black people away in prison for doing the exact same thing.
One reason she couldn't even get 2% of the Democratic vote in the 2020 primaries was because she couldn't stay consistent on her platform, and spoke basically in "word salads." One of the reasons she laughs so much is to cover up how stupid and lost she actually is. I've seen other idiots do it too when they're embarrassed about their mental shortcomings or trying to cover up their feelings in an awkward situation.
got the job of being Attorney General of California from sleeping with other politicians in the California Senate, rather than getting an actual law degree
So you admit she whored herself out to Willie Brown?
shareThey both claim they were in a relationship, so now that's whoring oneself out?
shareHe was cheating on his wife with her, and she got political favors in return. That makes her a whore and a nasty, vile woman.
shareBrown separated from his wife in 1982. His and Kamala's relationship started in 1994. They broke up in late 1995 or early 1996. She won district attorney in 2003.
So dislike her politics, and her policies, but this whole bit about being a whore is just petty bullshit because she's a woman.
Just look into American politician sex scandals. Having a ex boyfriend who may or may not have helped her career is peanuts compared to many on both sides of aisle. Including have an extra marital with a stripper, as well as being accused by 25 different women of sexual assault.
So, maybe try not to have different standards for men and women/right and left.
He was still married to her when she slept with him. She should have known better.
Had Willie brown not paid her in political favors she never would have gotten as far as she did (that and her race and gender).
She is a whore and she’s a vile, nasty woman.
They had been separated for over 10 years. He was not living with his wife, and wasn't cheating. Are you calling him a whore? He's the one who was married.
Which specific political favours did Willie Brown provide for her? She won district attorney 7 years after they broke up. So was that because she slept with him 7 years prior? Find me a politician who hasn't been helped in their career by the connections they've made. I think most people, in almost any profession have been helped out at one point or another by someone they know.
I'm not saying that you should like the woman. I'm not saying that you should agree with her, or her politics. But this vile, double standard that women face in politics is disgusting, and needs to be called out as the bullshit that it is.
Yes Willie Brown is just as bad but we aren’t talking about him so quit deflecting. They were still married, they had an affair and she got political favors in exchange for being good in bed allegedly. It’s disgusting and abnormal.
Do you understand what separated means? They weren't living together as a married couple.
she got political favors in exchange for being good in bed allegedly
If no longer living together as a married couple ("separated") ends/concludes a marriage, why do we have divorce and divorce courts? To make judges and lawyers rich? The reason people like Brown endlessly put off filing for divorce is they know it will cost them financially, most especially because our legal system actually financially protects women who are being dumped by philandering husbands.
Why don't you just be honest and say what you really want to say: you're convinced the institution of marriage is stupid and that we should all be eternal middle-schoolers, spending our lives hooking up and breaking up based on however we feel at the moment?
Why don't you just be honest and say what you really want to say: you're convinced the institution of marriage is stupid and that we should all be eternal middle-schoolers, spending our lives hooking up and breaking up based on however we feel at the moment?
Here are my points:
1. I agree with you that people should not accept male politicians who are having affairs, but disagree that they are never called nasty names. Look at how Bill Clinton became a laughingstock and probably cost his wife the presidency in 2016.
2. No one seriously believes that Harris "slept her way to the top". What they're saying is that instead of being a brilliant young mind with great ideas who worked hard while competing on a level playing field, she found ways behind-the-scenes to open doors and ingratiate herself with those who could make the process easier. Whether one is male or female, those who think there are "special rules" for them will eventually have their competency questioned like Harris is right now.
3. You seem preoccupied with this idea that "living in different houses" makes a marriage null and void. Even if we only look at marriage as a business agreement or a legal corporation, why would "living in a different house" render worthless the promises and protections that marriage offers? In other words, how does "living in a different house" dissolve a corporation? If your view is correct, then ALL married people should "live in different houses" so they can pay far less taxes by filing as single people.
I'm not hung up on marriage like you are. If someone is separated from their spouse, living separately, and dating other people when their spouse knows about it, it's none of my business. There are a lot of different types of relationships. If what Willie had with his wife worked for them, great. Does that mean that it works for me or you? I don't know. But it's not really my business.
No one seriously believes that Harris "slept her way to the top"Not the vibe I'm getting from this post. share
They were still a married couple, Kamala slept with a married man to further her political career.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/how-vice-president-kamala-harris-got-started-politics
It’s all right there, every position that Willie Brown appointed Kamala to.
Don’t try deflecting, we are talking about Kamala. If you’d like to talk about other politicians then there are other boards in which to do that. The fact still remains that Kamala would not have made it as far as she did had she not agreed to be Willie Brown’s little play thing.
So do you have a problem with the appointments because she's a woman, or because she slept with him?
What about Paul Horcher, or Brian Setencich? Both of them received appointments from Brown. Are they vile? They supported him, and received jobs. That's how politics work. Was Kamala unsuited for the jobs she was appointed for? She was district attorney before she was attorney general. How is that not qualified? Do you think she would have become chief of the Career Criminal Division if she wasn't qualified. Or was she sleeping with Terence Hallinan too?
In politics and in life, if you have the opportunity to hire a qualified person, or an equally qualified person you know, most of the time the qualified person you know gets the job. That's life.
I made my point quite clear. She should not be in the position she is in because she’s unqualified, but she is because she whored herself out and because she’s a woman of color.
Also stop deflecting, this discussion is about Cacklin’ Kamala, there are other boards on here for you to discuss those other politicians.
Kamala was beyond unsuited for those jobs, she’s been a complete and total failure at everything she’s done, she’s an entitled princess who was served everything on a silver platter. She’s not a strong woman, she’s just an entitled brat.
You have not made your point as you have yet to prove that she is unqualified. Was she a not a prosecutor? Was she not hired by the district attorney's office? Would she have kept her job if she was unqualified? Was she not elected by the people for the position of attorney general?
As for deflecting, bringing up Paul Horcher and Brian Setencich is relevant to this conversation as they also received appointments from Brown. Your issue with Kamala is that she received appointments from Brown. So yeah, it's not deflection. I'm just wondering why your hatred is towards a woman who received from a man, but not other men who received appointments from the same man.
Kamala was beyond unsuited for those jobs, she’s been a complete and total failure at everything she’s donecare to provide examples of her failures at everything she's done?
Did Horcher or Setencich have sex with Willie Brown? I would think that would be quite relevant.
From the above poster's link:
Brown appointed Harris to several well-paid state commissions: the state Insurance Commission, the state Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board and later, the California Medical Assistance Commission.
In 1998, Harris took a job at the San Francisco District Attorney's Office, but was later demoted after opposing a measure to try juveniles as adults for felony crimes. After quitting, Harris took a job in the city attorney's office, and with Brown's help, raised $600,000 to defeat her former boss to become San Francisco DA. The city's campaign ethics board fined Harris $30,000 – the highest fine ever levied at the time – for violating campaign finance limits.
Did Horcher or Setencich have sex with Willie Brown? I would think that would be quite relevant.
but was later demoted after opposing a measure to try juveniles as adults for felony crimesAnd? If that was something that she believed in and was willing to be demoted for her point of view what's the problem?
If they're friends, which I don't actually know, that would at least still be thinking with one's "big head".
No need to quote the juveniles as adults part, I only included that because the next line was "after quitting".
"Fox isn't reliable" yeah, welcome to mainstream media.
"it was unintentional, she paid the fine blah blah blah"
Ok, but she raised so much money against her opponent that it turned out to be illegal. I'm not sure how you can call that earning her position. She may not have sold her body for that money, but I'm sure she sold herself in other ways.
Its a mystery. No one knows. Red Flags everywhere.
Edit : Wait, she does want a gun buy-back program installed and wants to decriminalize border crossings to ensure illegal immigrants get fast tracked to citizenship. No background checks, no vaccines. What could go wrong?
All she's doing is fast tracking America off a cliff.
Not to mention she's been VP for the last 4 yrs but wants us to vote her in before she does any of the positive stuff she says she will do. Its criminal and all Americans need to snap out of it and awaken to whats at stake here.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/36-days-vp-harris-refuses-reveal-policy-positions-give-news-conferences-interviews
Day 36 for this woman ducking the MSM and doing so on purpose because they know the moment Trump exposes her on Sept 10th, she's done and I don't give a shit if she's friends with higher ups at ABC/Disney or not. Trump will be ready for her and the following day, I don't want to hear shit from the MSM or the Cast of The VIEW about Trump beating up on a woman and being Racist & Misogynist nonsense.. She wants to be Leader of the Free World, Commander in Chief, then it's open season on her
"Day 36 for this woman ducking the MSM and doing so on purpose"
Tuesday was officially day 38.
And now it's Wednesday depending on where you live and it's now 39 days and from what I'm hearing is she'll do a sitdown interview with Dana Boesch from CNN but only with Tim Walz present which is just flat out odd no matter how you look at it.. I mean, what?? Is Walz going to be there to have to "Man-splain" everything that comes out of her mouth or what?? I just cannot believe people would be so butthurt over Trump, that you wouldn't have one second thought about voting for this woman who refuses interviews and attempts to change the rules of a debate already set in stone
shareI pray half the American people are not that dumb. But then I remember people like George Clooney exits making this happen, and he doesn't fuck around apparently. He seems to have some serious pull and influence and ability to raise some serious cheddar.
I used to like Clooney back in the day. Three Kings is a great movie.
Trump will win this election with more than the required amount of Electoral College Votes which is 270 and he'll end up with around 333 and Harris will win the so called Popular Vote and the Left will become unhinged over it and try and overthrow that Law that's been around for like EVER
shareTrump has to win by enough of a margin to overcome the Democrat cheating.
shareTrump wins Pennsylvania and Georgia and he flat out wins no matter what because Pennsylvania is really a big deal and Harris blew her chance at winning Pennsylvania by not choosing Josh Shapiro over Cupcake and Tampon defender in the boy's restrooms, Tim Walz
shareCommunism.
shareSure, corporate democrats are all about putting the means of production in the hands of the workers. You gottem.
shareTaking other people's money and giving it away is communism.
“I have never understood why it is "greed" to want to keep the money you have earned but not greed to want to take somebody else's money.”
― Thomas Sowell, Barbarians Inside the Gates and Other Controversial Essays
Sure, having a civilization is communism. You gottem.
shareMoney, power and material possessions.
shareWell, based on her behaviour, we can assume the following:
She is against bodily autonomy - she did not speak out against mandatory vaccination.
She is against free speech - she did not speak about against digital censorship.
She is in favour of genocide - she is not speaking out against what's happening to the Palestinians.
You can tell a lot about people based on what they don't say.
And you could probably argue she doesn't have a problem with a father showering with his 11 year old daughter based on her continued association with said father.
She'll be the first black woman to be President, that's all you need to know. Just shut up and get in line behind the other sheep and vote for her.
::::hysterical cackling:::