MovieChat Forums > Meghan Markle Discussion > Does anyone consider her the "Yoko Ono" ...

Does anyone consider her the "Yoko Ono" of the royal fami!y?

posted 2 years ago by Popcorngal (4937)
13 replies | jump to latest

I have read this comparison on videos and other forums pertaining to the royals. I guess due to media saturation, she is getting annoying to some extent. I was a kiddie then, but didn't John and Yoko leave London for NY due to the racist abuse from fans and media?

In addition, his fellow band mates were not fond of her, she did play a part in wrecking his marriage to Cynthia, although I am sure there were underlying issues before they met. I wonder how John's family got along with Yoko? I saw an interview with his Aunt Mimi, and she spoke about her in civil terms.

[–] emori (3674) 2 years ago

She literally is the Yoko Ono. She broke trust and friendship between brothers.

[–] Popcorngal (4937) 2 years ago

To be fair, Harry had resented his brother for years despite loving him as a sibling according to royal insiders. Considering Meghan has a broken relationship with her siblings, I can assume she feels sympathy, but not much else. From what I heard, Kate and Will have pretty much been cold to her for a long time.

[–] AmeriGirl26 (15105) 2 years ago

William and Cate were onto Meghan from the start. They sensed something not right about her when she was first introduced to the family, that her sickly sweet politeness wasn't genuine. I shudder to think how they reacted when the private investigators came back with their findings about Meghan.

They were right to be wary of her when she got engaged to Harry and the mask started to slip off. They were particularly not pleased with her when she treated the staff at the palace like slaves and snarled profanities at anyone who called her out on it. (She really loves dropping F-bombs). I don't think bullying their 3-year-old daughter or sneaking around in unauthorized areas of the palace, taking pictures of their kids with plans on selling them to the press endeared her to the Wales's either. The only member of the family that refused to hear about any of it was Harry, because he believed she was a perfect saint and that everyone was just "being mean." There's a reason Prince William eventually threw them out of Kensington Palace and made them move to Frogmore Cottage.

Even now, with the "Courtiers" book coming out, it just confirms that Meghan was difficult on purpose so she could weave a narrative that the royal family was "mean" and "racist" towards her and gave her a reason to run away to America. She was planning that even before the wedding and kept it secret from "the family that she never had."

[–] emori (3674) 2 years ago

She is such a two face. All Hollywood people are. She gives that fake generous smile while in public and then completely different person behind close doors.

Thats why so mane woke fanatics in USA believe she is this saint victim and refuse to believe that she was this horrible to stuff behind close doors. Despite numerous people coming out and there were official complains long before she declared herself "victim of prashism" or something.

Those people just look at her public persona and say: "She cant behave like that. Thats not in her nature".

Honestly I almost salute her weirdo father for doing so much damage to her publicly when we now know what a horrible manipulative person she is. And she couldnt stop him no matter what. He just kept going to press to bash her. And she had to ate it up. Its hilarious.

She could bully Palace servants and royals but she could do nothing to her trashy daddy ))) Every time she tried - it was worse for her.

[–] AmeriGirl26 (15105) 2 years ago

What's really sad are the demographics of the people who support her. Many of them are Americans under 25 and spend a lot of time on social media. They'll believe anything her PR teams tell them about her, and completely ignore anything bad she does. Evidently being 1/4 black absolves her of anything, and all they ever think about is her race vs. the race of her critics, never once considering that it's her lack of character that turns people off, not her skintone.

A lot of people were turned off about how cruel she was to her dad, cutting him out of her life the moment he couldn't be her personal piggy bank anymore (which incidentally was in 2016, the same year she started dating Harry). She even lied about the reason why he couldn't come to the wedding, claiming that he had stop taking her calls, when in fact he was in the hospital after suffering a heart-attack. She'd rather have an old famous prince walk her halfway down the aisle instead of the dad who brought her into this world, gave her everything, and was always there for her.

There's a reason he went on tv to complain. SHE is the one who stopped taking his calls, and he couldn't find any other way to communicate with her other than go on tv. It's theorized that one reason she made sure Harry never met Thomas in person, was because she'd woven a narrative about how she "grew up poor with nothing" and worked her way up through her own efforts. That lie would have been destroyed if Harry had talked to his future father-in-law and found out that daddy paid for everything while his "Little Flower" was growing up, including college and the rent for her condo in Toronto.

Anyone who treats their dad the way she did is no less than evil in my book.

[–] Otter (24464) 2 years ago

I think the supposed trust and friendship between the brothers was greatly exaggerated by royal publicists.

What we're seeing now is the real Harry, the bad-tempered, stupid, entitled jerk, who the royal family's publicists spent years passing off as a fun guy.

[–] emori (3674) 2 years ago

Yep. Agree. Harry was always spoiled brat but pretended to be good fun loving guy. His true colors showed when he told in that interview that he hated to go to all those meetings with people. But he went and pretended to be enjoying it.

William and Harry are not mother-son or husband-wife loving relationships. They are just brothers. Like Charles and Andrew. They dont have to be crazy about each other and have undying friendship. They are in different league. William has to prepare to be king one day. And Harry is just second son like Andrew.

And there had to be jealous from Harrys side.

At this stage William and Harry are more like colleagues. It was probably very cold at that funeral and all royal people and palace stuff dint say to Harry and Meghan more words then it needed by etiquette.

[–] TandyMan (11349) 2 years ago

I believe Harry will drop her like a bag of flaming hot shit when the time comes. She is nothing but poison.

[–] javie (2225) 2 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Otter (24464) 2 years ago

Yoko gets unfairly blamed for John Lennon's faults; he was an unstable mess on drugs before he met her, she didn't make him an unstable mess. And have you seen "Get Back", last year's documentary about the making of "Let It Be"? One of the more surprising things is that it showed the Beatles and Yoko getting along well most of the time, she didn't interfere with their work and they accompanied her while she yowled.

True, she and Lennon may have brought out the worst in each other, like their self-indulgent belief that everything they did in the name of "art" was genius, but the worst was already there. Same for Harry and Meg, IMHO they really bring out the worst in each other, and part of the bond between them is that they've finally found someone who will play along with their worst impulses instead of calling them out.

[–] whoanelly (1592) 2 years ago

That’s one of the better analyses I have read.👍🏼

[–] Otter (24464) 2 years ago

Thank you, I always aspire to be the Sane Fan.

[–] Popcorngal (4937) 2 years ago

Now both have rotten relationships with their siblings and fathers. I hope they make peace before Thomas or Charles pass away. That is a horrible feeling. I often think of 90's poignant song "In The Living Years".