In all fairness I think when she said she wanted to make men uncomfortable she was referring to Pakistani men who commit atrocities against women. Maybe that wasn’t what she meant but I’m giving her the benefit of the doubt.
The fact still remains though that barely anyone cares about Rey Palpatine and she did say that a woman deserves to direct a Star Wars movie because it’s 2024, not because of her qualifications and she seems to be oblivious to the fact that there have been strong women in Star Wars all the way back to A New Hope. She has very little experience directly and to say the least Disney seems to be setting this film up for failure and are doubling down on everything the fans hate about Disney Star Wars
You're being either disingenuous here or incredibly naive. You really think this woman was hired to direct a Star Wars film because she was the best they could find? You would have to live under a rock not to see what is at play here.
You're the gullible fucker taking a quote from 8 years ago about her award winning film about violence against women in Pakistan and applying it to Star Wars. So we don't need a lecture from you about "what is at play". I'll bet you haven't even got a clue that she's directed several fantasy/adventure films.
I have the technical skills to click on a link to her IMDB bio thanks and you are having a laugh if you think making fantasy films in Indian/Pakistani films qualify her to helm a SW film. She was hired as she ticks a couple of boxes and knows all the intersectionality buzz words to get 'the message' across.
1. I clearly was NOT referring to her previous work. You can tell because I explicitly state, that I was refering to Disney. That bit where you pretend to be too stupid to understand? Almost universial among lefties. Dishonestly pretend to be retarded. Why did you do that? Answer, you know that I am right, but want to hide it.
2. Dismissing my rightful anger about Wokeism/Disney as being "triggered" is you pretending to be too retarded to use the term correct. "Triggered" implies that I am having an emotional reaction to an irrelevant or insiginficant factor or word. My complaint about wokeism and it's effect on Disney entertainment is not a irrelevant or insignificant factor. YOu are an ass for pretending it is.
We can both read it. If you have a point to make that somehow addresses my post, then go for it.
Until then.
1. I clearly was NOT referring to her previous work. You can tell because I explicitly state, that I was refering to Disney. That bit where you pretend to be too stupid to understand? Almost universial among lefties. Dishonestly pretend to be retarded. Why did you do that? Answer, you know that I am right, but want to hide it.
2. Dismissing my rightful anger about Wokeism/Disney as being "triggered" is you pretending to be too retarded to use the term correct. "Triggered" implies that I am having an emotional reaction to an irrelevant or insiginficant factor or word. My complaint about wokeism and it's effect on Disney entertainment is not a irrelevant or insignificant factor. YOu are an ass for pretending it is.
So what you're saying is that your comments are completely independent of the fake controversy that's been drummed up and which this thread is promoting. You're just saying them because you believe all that stuff to be true about Disney in general, so she might as well have said all that stuff. If you aren't triggered then why are you responding to this thread? Just a coincidence? You selected a thread at random to reiterate your suspicions about Disney apropos of nothing and luckily it was a thread spreading fake news on those same terms?
1. The "stuff about diseny" is true. Only trolls and leftards deny it. This is a valid reason for my anger with disney, relevant, not "triggered".
2. Disney hiring a woke woman to direct Star Wars? That is clearly part of the larger problem.
3. At this point Disney needs to be hiring manly men and the palest ones they can find, to try to send a message to fans that they are reversing their previous plan of insulting their fans.
I must admit I'm a bit confused about this new marketing technique criticizing half their audience, but it makes me no never mind as I have no problem not going where I'm not wanted and haven't enjoyed the few times I gave it a chance thinking it was some reverse psychology trick.
Hopefully this phase will pass, but I'm not holding my breath.
The reason you're confused is that this "marketing technique" never happened. It's fake news to make incels go on the internet and talk a load of pathetic shit.
Only incels use the terms like misandry and man hating. And woke. And combine them into some conspiracy against them.
Capisce?
You do know that incels isn't even an insult, right? It's a term that incels themselves invented to provide some sort of clinical legitimacy to their complaints about being an oppressed section of society.