Michael Moore's theory - Kyle Rittenhouse Discussion

[–] Satan2016 (25525) 3 years ago

Mikey has always been a moron.

reply

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

And Kyle a little bitch

reply

[–] chilone (17875) 3 years ago

Who's the little bitch? The vindicated one or the one crying about it?

reply

[–] Gary O. (1009) 3 years ago

Who's the little bitch? The vindicated one or the one crying about it?

Good point.

Has the thread complaining about this board been taken down?

reply

[–] Adam60z (3766) 3 years ago

True. Someday he'll be in prison and then we can celebrate. But don't worry Vile, we'll chip in a mail him a skirt and maybe stilettos!

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 3 years ago

I agree with you 100%. The best thing society could have done for that kid is lock him up for manslaughter so he could learn from his mistake.

They've only given Rittenhouse a green light to continue this sort of reckless behavior which will either get him killed, or in prison the next time he shoots people and isn't lucky enough to get a judge and jury who get all teary over his crying act.

reply

[–] Adam60z (3766) 3 years ago

Unfortunately I don't think he's dumb enough to get arrested again. Now that he's up and coming in far right circles the GQP may sponsor his run for Congress.
He would never "learn from his mistake". He has no remorse and continues to attack his murder victims as he goes from rightwing interview to interview while hobnobbing with the former guy at Mar-a-lago.
The thing is he's inspired (if that's the right word) thousands of Proud Boys to do the same thing. We've already seen the Oxford shooting and many more to come as the shooters now know they can get away with it. That's why President Biden needs to sign an Executive Order to take the guns away from these Fascist Fools many of whom are MC trolls.

reply

[–] chilone (17875) 3 years ago

He'd definitely make a better congressman than all the Democrats combined, including your brilliant VP, Kackling Kamala (20% approval rate) who was amazed that an electric car charger (you know, a wire) didn't make noise like a gas pump and that she didn't have to hold it while it charged. A bunch of baboons are smarter than you lot.

P.S. If you ever get attacked (which is easy to imagine), just "take the beating" since you don't believe in self defense.

reply

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 3 years ago

LOL if Adam was in Rittenhouse’s position he would shit his pants and would be crying for the “racist” police to save his sorry ass. It would be so funny to watch that.

reply

[–] chilone (17875) 3 years ago

💯

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 3 years ago

Rittenhouse shit his pants. If he wasn't a murderer I would lol at that pic of him on his ass on the ground with his last victim Grosskreutz pointing a gun at him. Difference between a man with some values and Rittenhouse is that his last victim could have shot him but didn't. Rittenhouse's victims only wanted to get a gun away from a crazy unhinged kid.

reply

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 3 years ago

Then why were they chasing him? If you want to get away you don’t chase the person you are afraid of while he is retreating. BLM attempted to murder him and Kyle stood his ground and used his right to self defense. The libtards have everything totally backwards and it seems they wanted him to just sit there while they kill you. This is a breakdown of current libtard logic:

01) We are going to defund the police so you don’t have the right to police protection
02) You don’t get tax payer funded security like the law makers who are defunding the police do
03) Since you no longer have the right to police protection it becomes necessary for you to defend yourself but you don’t have the right to do that, if you do then you are the murderer

So in a nutshell: Just sit there and let BLM kill you. Rittenhouse was a hero, he showed us that we don’t have to just take it while BLM torches our cities and tries to kill us. The jury made the right decision in acquitting him and they are very brave for doing so considering they were facing death threats from the left.

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 3 years ago

Dude, he shot one man already. That's why they were chasing him.

01) If the Kenosha police need high school boys to try and do their job maybe we should defund them.
02) See 01. That's why we have cops.
03) Bullshit. The Kenosha Police should have been policing that protest.

reply

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 3 years ago

Again the only people he shot were already trying to kill him. And the people who chased him were just as reckless as you claim he was. Rittenhouse was trying to flee and BLM tried to chase him down and murder him, they got what they deserved.

01) The only reason he was needed was because the libtards in the Kenosha government already defunded the police and wouldn’t let them do their job. Are you really this stupid? The problem existed because of the libtard government of Kenosha
02) Except the libtards won’t let them do their jobs and if they do they are arrested and called every vile disgusting name including “racist” by the libtard media. So on the one hand you’re bitching that they aren’t doing their job while actively trying to make it harder. Doesn’t make any sense.
03) And they weren’t because the libtards who run the city wouldn’t let them. They should have accepted the national guard but they didn’t for political reasons and people got hurt as a result. If you want to blame anyone blame the DemoKKKrats, they caused the entire incident and they have blood on their hands.

reply

[–] Adam60z (3766) 3 years ago

With a plastic bag and a skateboard? Rottenlouse had an AR15 and walked into the crowd of protestors, shot one 4 times, then tried to get away. 2 heroes tried to stop the mass shooting terrorist so he murdered one and maimed another. Then the cops who had cheered him on earlier told him to "go home". But all his accomplices should now be in prison for life: his mother, his boyfriend who gave him the AR15, the cops who were complicit, the gun manufacturers, the NRA, and all his supporters.

reply

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 3 years ago

More lies that you were probably spoon fed to you by MSDNC or Fake News CNN. Kyle did not instigate the encounter BLM did, and then as he tried to retreat they hunted him down and tried to kill him. And yes it doesn’t matter if they have a weapon other than a gun, if they are using it to kill you you can defend yourself with deadly force. Deadly force is deadly force, if I try to choke you then you have a right to reach into your pocket, grab a gun and shoot me.

The only people who are complicit are A) BLM, B) The Kenosha government officials who rejected the support of the National Guard and C) The DemoKKKrat establishment who told BLM that it’s OK to riot, cause insurrections, burn cities down and kill people.

Kyle used his right to self defense but by your logic if BLM tries to kill you you have to sit there and take it. Hmmmmm I’m betting if the situation were reversed your moral standards would take a complete 180 as it always does with libtard DemoKKKrats.

reply

[–] sokar (2098) 3 years ago

2 heroes tried to stop the mass shooting terrorist

I fixed it for you

2 pedos tried to stop a man defending himself.

The more important question is why are you defending pedos

reply

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 3 years ago

Thank you for setting the record straight sokar. The dumbass libtards have everything backwards as usual. Seriously though Kyle needs to sue the shit out of the fake news libtard media and Biden for their lies and smear campaign.

reply

[–] Gary O. (1009) 3 years ago

With a plastic bag and a skateboard?

If the skateboard is being used as a club, Rittenhouse had the right to defend himself.

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 2 years ago

I think he was trying to put the plastic bag over Kyle's head and suffocate him. 🤣

reply

[–] ProgsReturn (2078) 3 years ago

I'm curious. What do you think the outcome would have been had there been an actual police presence on the street where it happened?

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 3 years ago

Well I think it's the job of police to control violence in the streets, not a bunch of rednecks with guns. I don't see that Rittenhouse protected any property. He just incited violence by prancing around with a rifle. And there were police on patrol. They told Rittenhouse to move along at one point.

The Kenosha Police Department themselves said they did not want armed vigilantes on the street. The true conservative position is to have law and order - not high school kids with guns playing vigilante cop.

reply

[–] footlegger (1462) 3 years ago

Any true conservative would despise Trump and yet they worship the golden toilet he shits on.

reply

[–] ProgsReturn (2078) 3 years ago

>Well I think it's the job of police to control violence in the streets, not a bunch of rednecks with guns. I don't see that Rittenhouse protected any property. He just incited violence by prancing around with a rifle. And there were police on patrol. They told Rittenhouse to move along at one point.

The police clearly weren't bothered by Kyle 'prancing around with a rifle' as you say. And the only violence incited was by some loony chasing after him swinging a skateboard. Geeze, if only the police did their job; then Kyle would be in jail for inciting violence and 2 convicts with a history of violence would still be alive.

Maybe defunding the police wasn't a good idea after all.

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 3 years ago

The police were overwhelmed by redneck yahoos carrying rifles. They did order Rittenhouse to leave the first car lot he was trying to "protect". He just found another one down the block to "protect" once the police had moved on.

If you think Rittenhouse was needed to keep the peace at a black civil rights march, you make a good argument for defunding the police. I'm an old school law and order guy. Keep teenagers with rifles off the street. Let the police do their job. Where did you grow up, Zimbabwe?

reply

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

[deleted]

[–] ProgsReturn (2078) 3 years ago

>I don't see that Rittenhouse protected any property.

OK then you say this...

>They did order Rittenhouse to leave the first car lot he was trying to "protect".

The car lot suffered ~$1.5m damages in arson attacks the night before in what lefties call protests, not riots. Kyle was there to protect these properties from enduring more damage.

>If you think Rittenhouse was needed to keep the peace at a black civil rights march, you make a good argument for defunding the police.

>If you think Rittenhouse was needed to keep the peace at a black civil rights march, you make a good argument for defunding the police.

The fact that peacekeepers of any kind are needed at black civil rights marches speaks a lot about the intention of the marchers.

>Where did you grow up, Zimbabwe?

Imagine growing up in Kenosha, or anywhere in the USA where morons consider these riots where cars and buildings are burnt as 'peaceful'.

Meanwhile Zimbabwe has a murder rate of 7.48 per 100,000 ppl compared to the USA's rate of 4.96, but hey! Black Lives Matter, no?

reply

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 3 years ago

So what was he supposed to do? Just let BLM murder him? I noticed you don’t really seem to have a problem with BLM rioting and killing people but you do have a problem with law abiding citizens trying to stop BLM from rioting and killing. Typical backwards ass fuck libtard logic.

reply

[–] chilone (17875) 3 years ago

Are you really expecting an answer to a common sense question from these brainwashed leftists?

reply

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 3 years ago

Not really, but I thought I would get their unwillingness to answer a very common sense question on record.

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 3 years ago

I'll answer this, fool, as an American who is very skeptical of BLM and supports LAW AND ORDER.

Nobody tried to murder Rittenhouse. The short guy with the skateboard merely tried to knock the gun out of his hands. The guy who had Rittenhouse down on the ground like a stuck pig with a gun pointed at his head didn't even shoot him.

reply

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 3 years ago

Doesn’t matter if he had a gun or not numb nuts. If you are facing any kind of deadly force you can defend yourself with deadly force. They chased him after he was retreating, BLM could have ended it right there but instead they hunted him down to kill him which was why he had no choice but to use deadly force. Also they were committing and insurrection so deadly force was justified even before the encounter.

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 3 years ago

Dude, the guy hit his arm with the skateboard to knock the rifle out of his hand. Nobody tried to kill Rittenhouse.

You know what? Show up at a riot with a gun and you might have a fight on your hands.

reply

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 3 years ago

You are lying, or you have been brainwashed by the Libtard media. They hunted him down like rabid dog to kill him. Doesn’t matter if they had a skateboard or not deadly force is deadly force. Kyle never pointed his gun at anyone until his life was in danger, the tapes prove it.

Maybe instead we just shouldn’t condone rioting like the libtard cult has been doing. Defund the police and you’ll have a riot on your hands. And if BLM is burning a city down private citizens absolutely have the right to self defense, but you seem to think BLM can just murder whoever they want because they toe the political agenda you like, you are a sick person.

reply

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 3 years ago

Also you need to educate yourself on how self defense laws work. If the person is retreating you have no right to hunt them down and kill them. Just like how if someone breaks into my house and threatens my family, if I scare them out of the house and they run away I can’t chase them down and shoot them. If I then tackle the person and try to kill him he now has a right to self defense. And keep in mind I am giving you every benefit of the doubt in this scenario, Rittenhouse didn’t murder anyone nor did he attempt to victimize an innocent person, I am saying if he had then BLM still wouldn’t have had the right to chase him down and try to kill him. But I can’t expect a deluded libtard cultist to truly understand what he’s talking about.

reply

[–] sokar (2098) 3 years ago

So he was just supposed to let the guy stamping on him continue.

As always lets attack the lad who defended himself while keeping completely silent about the nutters who were there to burn, loot and riot. We will just slide over that fact shall we.

reply

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 3 years ago

Libtards only care about the lives of people who agree with them. If you disagree with them then yes you are apparently just supposed to sit there and allow left wing terrorists to kill your or else you’re the murderer, it’s beyond sick.

reply

[–] Wuchak (8737) 3 years ago

They've only given Rittenhouse a green light to continue this sort of reckless behavior

Ironically Kyle was the sole person to not tolerate the reckless behavior -- actually thoroughly lawless behavior -- of the BLM & ANTIFA thugs that Dems let loose on American cities to freely Burn/Loot/Murder like animals (which is an insult to animals).

That's why Lefties hate Rittenhouse and his just vindication by a court of law so much. They don't like the idea of anyone righteously standing up to their unleashed thug scum forces. They want noble citizens to sheepishly back down and take a critical beating (or even die) in submission, like that shopowner in Dallas in May, 2020, who sought to defend his business from Burning/Looting/Murdering (https://www.tmz.com/2020/05/31/dallas-man-beaten-kicked-for-defending-storefront-with-sword/).

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 3 years ago

It's called a protest. Didn't Rittenhouse say he supports BLM protests all a sudden now? Lol.

Dude, we have cops to keep the peace at protests, not snot-nosed kids who panic and shoot people.

reply

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 3 years ago

It’s called a riot/insurrection. BLM was burning the city down.

And the libtards who ran the city were defunding the police and rejected the National Guard. Private citizens stepping up and doing the job the government refused to was literally the only way to maintain anything resembling law and order.

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 3 years ago

I'm confused though. Rittenhouse says he supports BLM. Lol. Your high school boy hero supports BLM. Why don't you?

reply

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 3 years ago

Total non sequitur, Kyle could have had his BLM/Antifa membership approved and it wouldn’t change the fact that he has a right to self defense. I don’t care if he’s the libbiest of liberals out there, BLM doesn’t have the right to murder anyone. Funny how your sense of a persons life fluctuates with their political beliefs, it’s also quite disturbing.

Since most of the victims of BLM riots are more than likely liberals themselves does that mean that I don’t’ have a right to be concerned about them? What are you saying? They deserve to die because of their political beliefs? Again you are a sick person.

reply

[–] asom (6832) 2 years ago

So in your small brain supporting BLM means supporting riots, burning of cities and allowing others to beat or even kill you.

Got it. You must be some kind of special, too bad Reagan stopped putting people like you in their place.

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 2 years ago

I was responding to this "MovieChatUser" who keeps calling a BLM a terrorist organization. If that's true why did yours and MCU's Boy Hero say, even after his acquittal, that he supports BLM?

Can you stop drooling allover yourself long enough to answer that question? 🤣

reply

[–] asom (6832) 2 years ago

Can you understand the difference between the movement and the idea behind it (BLM) and the marxist/terrorist/thievery organization BLM???

https://www.newtownbee.com/08202020/blm-organization-vs-blm-movement-a-semantic-trap/

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 2 years ago

I am critical of BLM as well. I'm merely pointing out the inconsistency of the argument. BLM was not on trial.

reply

[–] asom (6832) 2 years ago

You brought the issue of him supporting BLM - the terrorist organization while most probably he said he supports the idea behind the movement - that Black Lives Matter.

So if it's about inconsistency I'm afraid that it's yours.

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 2 years ago

No. I wasn't talking about BLM until MovieChatUser called BLM terrorists and then said Rittenhouse supported terrorists. You guys are allover the place and can't even make a cohesive argument. You're defeating your own talking points. 🤣

reply

[–] chilone (17875) 2 years ago

You are one dim bulb. Even if Kyle supports BLM and they are a terrorists, he still had a right to defend himself.

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 2 years ago

Lol. He only supported BLM when he went on talk shows after he was acquitted. The hypocrisy is the point.

And I'm referring to the inconsistency of you sheep, you Hero Worshipers here. You guys are saying they're terrorists, not me.

reply

[–] chilone (17875) 2 years ago

I never said that and it's irrelevant. He had the right to defend himself. Period.

If the tables were turned and he was one of you lunatic leftist, I'd say the same.

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 2 years ago

You're coming in at the end of this train of the thread. An issue was made of BLM's "terrorism". That's what I'm addressing.

reply

[–] chilone (17875) 2 years ago

I've been in this thread for 6 months.

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 2 years ago

So? Follow the recent conversation.

reply

[–] chilone (17875) 2 years ago

I did. It's your usual leftist nonsense. You are not on the right side of this.

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 2 years ago

Lol. Posters who know me know I am anything but left wing. They call me a Trumpite and a fascist and all sorts of choice words. I am none of those things. But I am not left wing either.

You're Don Quixote tilting at windmills.

reply

[–] asom (6832) 2 years ago

Actually no, you were the first to say that Rittenhouse supported BLM

Didn't Rittenhouse say he supports BLM protests all a sudden now? Lol.

And no one said that Rittenhouse supported terrorists. No one but you.

you are playing on the semantics with the word BLM, just like in the article.

Did he say that he supports BLM the organization or the idea - protests (no, as you've been already told a riot is not the same with a protest)? Or you just dragged yourself in stupidity?

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 2 years ago

Uh, no. This conversation is spread out over several threads and MCU broached the idea that Rittenhouse supports BLM and he also claims BLM is a terrorist organization. Show me where I ever said BLM is a terrorist organization? Again, you Hero Worshipers can't keep your own bullshit straight.

reply

[–] asom (6832) 2 years ago

You still can't make the difference between BLM as the idea and BLM as the organization?

I mean, why do I even ask???

And no, I'm not going to read hundreds of posts in different threads to soo your bullshit ;)

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 2 years ago

BLM has nothing to do with Rittenhouse's murder trial.

reply

[–] asom (6832) 2 years ago

Exactly, it doesn't, so stop using it as an excuse to shit on him.

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 2 years ago

The best thing for Rittenhouse, as a juvenile, would have been a manslaughter conviction and several years in prison so he could be rehabilitated.

My fear for this kid now is that he has learned no lesson from this and he will end up doing the same thing 5 or 10 years from now and he won't be so lucky next time and he'll end up dead.

reply

[–] asom (6832) 2 years ago

You are so dense and you have NO idea what you're talking about. A juvenile has NO place in prison.

And there's no need to rehabilitate someone that acted in self defense.

No, you know what's your problem???

Your problem, as a leftist, is that Rittenhouse verdict showed the world that it is ok to defend yourself against lunatics. That it's ok to shoot down BLM protesters that assault you.

And hopefully those will think twice before doing some stupid shit again.

If it was after me I would have cheered if all those motherfuckers that attacked, maimed, killed people during the BLM "protests" were shot and killed.

Someone else should have died instead of David Dorn (a black ex police officer killed while trying to defend a store during "peaceful" BLM "protests").

That's your real problem: you start to be afraid of real consequences for your stupid actions.

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 2 years ago

Oh jeezus fucking christ. The same crazy ranting from all you Kyle-Worshipers.

You name call because you have no rational response. I'm not a leftist, ignatz.

You guys have a problem with BLM, fine. I'm not 100% behind them either. But I'm not some dumbfuck like you Kyle-Worhsipers who thinks they are terrorists.

Rittenhouse panicked and killed people. A trained police officer would have never done that. This should have been left to the cops.

reply

[–] asom (6832) 2 years ago

you cannot be that dumb.

so if someone attacks me i cannot defend myself because I'm not a cop?

how moronic is this????

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 2 years ago

1) He played cop by bringing a rifle to a riot. He was a provocation. Protestors assumed he was the next Columbine killer.

2) Rosenbaum threw a plastic bag at him. He used undue force. He could have slugged him in the jaw.

Rittenhouse is a pussy.

reply

[–] sokar (2098) 3 years ago

It's called a protest

Peacefully walking with placards and shouting statements is a protest.

Burning, looting and attacking people is a riot.

Learn the difference please as it just makes you look foolish

reply

[–] chilone (17875) 3 years ago

You're so lost and deluded. Great tool for the Democrats (who don't give a rip about you).

reply

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 3 years ago

Lost and deluded is the DemoKKKrats primary voting base. They would have to be lost and deluded to actually believe their bullshit.

reply

[–] kwestmo (4385) 3 years ago

"mail him a skirt and maybe stilettos!" You are sexually obsessed with Kyle. i suspect you are a catcher, not a pitcher.

reply

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

And apparently he is now joined by the asshat Adam60z. Funny how these cunts always ignore reality and run like CNN anchors trying to pass off fiction as fact.

reply

[–] AzureSeb (506) 3 years ago

I don't think the OP will ever get over this, lol. Move on, get a life and try to get laid.

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 3 years ago

If Kyle had gotten laid he probably wouldn't have killed two people. This thing has frustrated Elliot Roger style incel virgin written allover it.

reply

[–] chilone (17875) 3 years ago

He wouldn't have killed those reprobates if they hadn't attacked him.

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 3 years ago

They tried to disarm a lunatic. Nobody tried to kill Rittenhouse.

reply

[–] chilone (17875) 3 years ago

I would try to lead you to the truth but it's casting pearls before the swine or to put it another way, if I have to explain, you wouldn't understand.

reply

[–] OnanTheBarbarian (12006) 3 years ago

I gotta pearl cock ring you might wanna see.

reply

[–] chilone (17875) 3 years ago

How's 5th grade treating you this time around?

reply

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 3 years ago

Ewww, you want him to see your cock? That’s gross.

reply

[–] Adam60z (3766) 3 years ago

True. Instead of a girlfriend he had a boyfriend who gave him an AR15.

reply

[–] Nettie (4) 3 years ago

Yes, it's a good thing he had it because Rosenbaum got triggered when Kyle put out the fire he lit in the dumpster

He was going to roll it over to a gas station. I guess you're sorry Kyle foiled his attempt to blow it up and cause more fatalities

reply

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

Fuck that fat piece of shit, Kyle could have shot him and his massive gut would have ricocheted the bullet back at Kyle.

reply

[–] Galilguy (2476) 3 years ago

One thing I never see leftists admit, is the fact that these people were child molesters and setting fires to other people's property. I can only assume the OP is ok with both of those disgusting things?

reply

[–] Nettie (4) 3 years ago

The reason why Rosenbaum was so fired up and went after Kyle is because Kyle put out his dumpster fire that he was going to roll over to a gas station

reply

[–] whynotwriteme (7720) 3 years ago

How is Michael Moore even still alive? Normally, feces disintegrates within a few days after leaving the anus.

reply

[–] Adam60z (3766) 3 years ago

I guess you know that from first hand experience fertilizing your own lawn.

reply

[–] whynotwriteme (7720) 3 years ago

Yeah, I just have my Liberal neighbors roll back and forth across the grass a few times. I hooked up one of those Slip & Slides so they don't catch on. Their fecal oozings and drippings work wonders. The lawn is beautiful.

reply

[–] asom (6832) 2 years ago

The same way Zombies are alive for years in those movies ...

reply

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 3 years ago

Why should anyone give a fuck what Michael Moore thinks?

reply

[–] JohnnyDoe (1884) 3 years ago

So he'll add MM to his list?

reply

[–] trevorh321 (5495) 3 years ago

I don't agree with Michael on this theory. Why doesn't he move to Cuba, though?

reply

[–] raymondoz2007 (2098) 3 years ago

is it me or..........is this thread shades of IMDB

reply