MovieChat Forums > Kyle Rittenhouse Discussion > Can the people stop using Kyle victims c...

Can the people stop using Kyle victims criminal history as a defense.


1) Kyle had no fucking clue who these people were at all when he shot them. So the point is totally mute.

2) If the two men where guilty of something, they should be tried in a court of law. Not by some kid playing Judge Dredd. Kyle dosn't have the right to be the judge, jury and executioner. That not how things are suppose to work. And if think that how it should work. You are asking for vandalism. Why don't you just look up people criminal records and go around killing people. If that what you guys really want. Jesus.

reply

1. Stop calling Rittenhouse a white supremacist when he’s not. Even if he was, they had no idea when they attacked him so that point is totally moot.

2. Stop calling those criminals “innocent victims” and “heroes”. They attacked Rittenhouse, and they’re the worst scum imaginable. The Left's romanticizing of these people is precisely why we keep bringing up their criminal history. They're not heroes, they're criminals. They weren't trying to protect other people from Rittenhouse, they were trying to kill Rittenhouse as we saw from the evidence.

3. They weren’t judged by Rittenhouse. It was self-defense, get that through your thick head. SELF. DE. FENSE. Rittenhouse protected himself when they attacked him and tried to kill him. That’s not the same as judgement or execution or whatever. Jesus.

4. Stop using the “State Lines” complaint when not only did he get the gun in Kenosha, there’s no law saying that you can’t carry a gun across State Lines anyway. That point is totally moot.

5. Stop saying Kyle went there to fight and shoot people. He went there to protect a car dealership, to put out fires, to remove graffiti, to provide emergency aid, and because he had family there. Basically, he went there to help. He got a gun because riots are dangerous and he would need to defend himself, which he did.

reply

The victims were terrible people who got what they deserved. If you care more about their lives than the person they were trying to kill ( Kyle Rittenhouse) you are a part of the problem.

reply

Hey, Jackoff! I don't think anyone is saying Kyle shot three people because of their criminal records. They were shot because they were the aggressors in a situation where Mr. Rittenhouse had to DEFEND himself which resulted in the death of two and one injured. Their criminal history just made it easier to accept the loss. Try to be a little smart.

reply

And folks, another Troll has joined. Welcome Troll Jacksman344! But, you’ve overstayed your Welcome. Begone Troll back to your home…under your bridge.

reply

1) Kyle had no fucking clue who these people were at all when he shot them. So the point is totally mute.


I'm disappointed no one's mentioned this yet.

reply

I didn’t mention it, but I at least used the correct word in my comment.

reply

Is this a joke? Their criminal histories are irrelevant. They're only brought up in an attempt to get the ignorant to comprehend the simplest of facts.

The first guy, who's a pedophile, attacked him and tried to take his gun. He's now dead. Completely justified.

The second guy chased him down and beat him with a skateboard while Rittenhouse was on the ground. Second guy dead. Completely justified.

The last guy pulled a weapon and pointed it in Rittenhouse's face. He got shot as a result. Completely justified. I'm just sorry Rittenhouse's aim wasn't better.

reply

Criminal shooting a criminal is still illegal, reasonable people understand that.

reply

"Criminal shooting a criminal is still illegal, reasonable people understand that."

Doesn't apply in this case. Rittenhouse isn't a criminal.

And no matter how much you cry and pout and throw your rattle out of your playpen, that's not going to change.

reply

"Victims"

reply