MovieChat Forums > Kyle Rittenhouse Discussion > Can the people stop using Kyle victims c...

Can the people stop using Kyle victims criminal history as a defense.

posted 3 years ago by Jacksman344 (120)
32 replies | jump to latest

1) Kyle had no fucking clue who these people were at all when he shot them. So the point is totally mute.

2) If the two men where guilty of something, they should be tried in a court of law. Not by some kid playing Judge Dredd. Kyle dosn't have the right to be the judge, jury and executioner. That not how things are suppose to work. And if think that how it should work. You are asking for vandalism. Why don't you just look up people criminal records and go around killing people. If that what you guys really want. Jesus.

[–] Zinger (2335) 3 years ago

Only when you stop romanticising them as innocent victims.

Mark Ruffalo referred to Rosenbaum as 'JoJo' for Christ's sake.

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

[deleted]

[–] KinkyInk (1694) 3 years ago

First of all, they're not 'victims'. They were attackers.

They're not using it as a defense. All the defense Rittenhouse needed was the videos and witness testimony proving he was being attacked and was exercising his right to self defense.

People are bringing up the the assailants' history because liberals are trying to paint them as heroes. Also to point out the fact that Kyle shot three 'random' people in a group of BLM rioters, and every one he hit has a criminal record. (And the one he missed has a criminal record.) That's four for four. What are the chances of that unless the BLM mob is rife with criminals?

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

I'm not sure the loony left want to paint them as heroes rather they want to make them martyrs and either way the fact that they were for all intents worthless pieces of shit should not be forgotten. The world is a better place with them feeding worms than it is with them living and victimizing other people in the future.

[–] KinkyInk (1694) 3 years ago

Mandalorian star calling them 'Selfless Heroes':

https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2021/11/21/the-mandalorian-star-pedro-pascal-eulogizes-murdered-criminals-who-attacked-kyle-rittenhouse/?fbclid=IwAR2Bu6WmrgJevvUZztxrVOavqgizIhoyapz4h3tpA2vtv_MQ_OFVVtxlB2E

I've seen others claiming the same thing.

[–] strntz (12254) 3 years ago

.. and every one he hit has a criminal record. (And the one he missed has a criminal record.) That's four for four. What are the chances of that unless the BLM mob is rife with criminals?

LOL, excellent observation. Either those BLM mobs are full of criminals or Rittenhouse managed a PowerBall odds scenario and managed to shoot the only four criminals in the whole "protest".

[–] TheGutterMonkey (298) 3 years ago

Their history of aggressive behavior is relevant to supporting the fact that they were the types to attack some kid. Which they clearly did.

This was also shown on video from about every angle imaginable, so it shouldn't be necessary to bring up their history. But, as it seems, the public's ability to utilize logic and observe evidence has been tossed out the window, replaced by a fairy tale about vigilante white supremacists that only kill white people lol.

Also: Asking for vandalism? lol This "evil" kid was the only one in this group spotted trying to clean graffiti off from schools and put out fires (things which the "victims" get angry over him doing). Hell, if anything he's anti-vandalism.

[–] Adam60z (3766) 3 years ago

The only criminal was Rottenlouse. The others were heroes who tried to stop an active shooter. Now there's another mass casualty event that I'm sure is connected. Too much hate and evil in Wisconsin and in the US: look how many voted for the former guy. Luckily he lost by 7 million more good guys.

[–] asom (6832) 3 years ago

Surely the new event was created by white supremacists, right?

[–] CraigC (8177) 3 years ago

Do you have to take drugs to think like that???

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

This should be the response to any wacked out crazy stuff the mainstream/far left say.

[–] asom (6832) 3 years ago

You’re right. It doesn’t really matter, what matters is that they attacked a kid and tried to kill him.

[–] JordanJoestar (23) 3 years ago

They attacked a kid and got what they deserved.

[–] CraigC (8177) 3 years ago

It's not a defense. Never was. It does make everyone feel better about what happened. He didn't shoot them because of their criminal history. He shot them because they attacked him.

[–] strntz (12254) 3 years ago

It's not a defense. Never was. It does make everyone feel better about what happened.

If you think about it, there would have been no "fine young men" shot anyway. Only someone with a criminal mentality would attack an armed person with no provocation.

[–] CraigC (8177) 3 years ago

Exactly! If they hadn't been scumbags, they wouldn't have put themselves in the position to get shot.

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

Can you stop calling them victims and start calling them what they were--his attackers?