I admire what she's doing, but...
Time Person of the Year ??? Seriously?
shareHitler, Stalin and Richard Nixon were also persons of the year. It's all about who had the most impact on society that year - good or bad.
I have no problem with Greta. If she gets people talking about the issue of climate change then it's a good thing I guess.
How does one admire a puppet. At least when a president or prime minister does/says something there is some room for doubt as to whether he/she/zheee is a puppet but not in this case. This is truly a pathetic situation.
shareIt really just highlights the stupidity of a Time person of the year... Kind of shows that it is nothing more than the People Magazine sexist man of the year crap. It has nothing to do with reality and is nothing more than PR agents behind the scenes campaigning and paying off people to get the spot for their client. You would have thought that the editors of Time magazine would have been smart enough not to start putting completely unworth people on the cover but I guess someone behind her had the biggest bag of money.
sharePeople are so naive it's crazy.
It's like they think Greta just decided to call a press conference one day and that was it. She's booking flights and calling the UN to confront everybody. Meanwhile, she losing sleep writing speeches and her parents are making dinner wondering where she is at, etc.
People think people on TV are just being filmed and it's not a whole big production behind the scenes.
Good point. I'm sure there's this whole entourage of people hired by the puppetmasters to ensure their little puppet doll tows the line.
shareWho cares about the media
shareI admire that she is a useful pawn of the looney left. Yeah, LOL>...
shareHanding out this award to a variety of non-accomplishers and bozos over the years has rendered it, like the Nobel Prize and the Pulitzer Prize, totally meaningless.
shareAn ex-CIA guy on youtube finally spilled the beans behind Time Magazine's questionable choices as to who goes on their "Person of the Year" cover. There is no voting, no consensus, no surveys; that's all a lie. It's the editor, the top dog himself who chooses the winner of the cover; basically whoever he wants on there, not a group of people. It explains a lot about why they would pick people like Hitler to be on their front cover.
share