MovieChat Forums > Donald Trump Discussion > Media consensus is that Trump got DESTRO...

Media consensus is that Trump got DESTROYED.


I haven't seen it yet. What are your thoughts?

reply

Destroyed no, outplayed yes.
Harris put him on his heels from the opening question/statement, which she took first, and imo, he never quite found his footing.

reply

Outplayed? lmao

She didn’t answer any questions even though ABC provided her with the answers ahead of time.

Her only tactics were to evade and lie.

The mods never fact checked her but they did Trump. Oh, and even the mods lied.

It was a 3 to 1 debate and Trump still won.

Trump even used her own "I'm talking now" tactic against her.

reply

Poor Trump. Always a victim. Harris wanted to debate Trump on Fox News Entertainment after she beat Trump soundly but as the coward he is he refused. Enjoy your orange master who is way too old to be president with his dementia getting worse by the day. Oh! Don't forget... Trump is also a 34 times convicted felon. Good luck with that!

reply

Look, I’m not sure what you’re after here. I’m fully aware that Harris is a complete buffoon, truth be told, they both are. That being said, she made less of an ass out of her self than Trump did.

I’m voting for Trump btw, our country is better off in his hands, but that doesn’t change the fact that he has no business running for POTUS.
We deserve so much more from our POTUS candidates than either one of these two assholes have to offer.
Fuck ‘em both.

reply

Everyone was supplied with the questions ahead of time. It’s called preparation. Abortion is going to come up. Isreal/Ukraine is going to come up. Derp. This critique exposes your outright vacuousness! 🤦🏻‍♂️

reply

Everyone was supplied with the questions ahead of time.

Show me where Trump was supplied with those questions.

She was given the exact questions.

Don't conflate general topics with exact questions.

"ABC News whistleblower swears under penalty of perjury that the Kamala Harris

campaign received questions ahead of time and directed the debate.

Affidavit was signed September 9th, the day before the debate."

reply

Show me where Trump was supplied with those questions.

Show me when Harris was supplied with those questions. Again you made a claim but did provide any evidence to backup that claim. So quit being stupid and show your proof.

https://www.foxnews.com/official-polls/fox-news-poll-voters-think-harris-did-better-than-trump-debate

Explain that, Cupcake.

reply

The Affidavit is available online. Besides, I don't provide supporters of child groomers and pedos with evidence.

reply

Where online? Please show a link to backup your claims. Are you really so stupid that you don't know that when you make any claim it's up to you to backup that claim. You should know this but I guess things are different from whatever shithole you're from. You are not an American.🖕🏻

reply

It's up to you to do your own research. Stop begging others for it, groomer.

reply

usual maga response when questioned on outlandish delusional bullshit.

You missed out "If I gave the proof you'd just ignore it" though - then you'd have had the full set of 3

reply

Why rely on others to do it for you when you can do it yourself.

It's laziness and incompetence, especially when you're constantly begging and nagging others for it.

reply

because in your case the thing we are meant to be researching and proving for ourselves never exists and we know it would be a fruitless waste of time .

Couple that with the 'fact' that you have apparently found whatever info it is why cant you just point to it ?

reply

the thing we are meant to be researching and proving for ourselves never exists

It existed everytime you and the rest of the hivemind rejected it, gaslighted and denied it when the proof was provided and now you bullshit because it's not spoonfed.

Don't forget that I've been on this forum long enough to see how you and other libtards are always moving the goalpost. Same leftoid tactics.

reply

The goalposts have not moved, your goal is to prove your assertion that an affidavit containing the information:
"ABC News whistleblower swears under penalty of perjury that the Kamala Harris campaign received questions ahead of time"
is available online.

You said its available on line , so presumably you've seen it and verified that this nonsense is not just a load of maga delusional bullshit being re tweeted. (which is the conclusion I came to when I searched for it)

reply

You just confirmed my entire previous post in the AJ board.

reply

What has me saying "Alex Jone's claim that 17m died from vaccine is bulshit" got to do with any of
a) this particular subject (affidavit)
b) you never providing proof of anything you say
c) me (and others) rejecting the proof that never appears

reply

The affidavit. 🤣 yes, I’m sure an affidavit would be produced, Really good for covering their tracks. Dude.

reply

An affidavit was produced from a whistleblower.

She wasn't supposed to receive the direct answers for it, Trump didn't.

reply

🤣 I’ve got some property you might be interested in…

reply

Wanna buy my island for a six pack?

reply

Considering that you leftoids fall for anything from the establishment MSM, I should be offering you a bridge for sale.

reply

No competent person needed to be supplied the questions. That’s retarded. Everyone knew what the questions were going to be!

reply

This^

If Trump was given them ahead it wouldn't make any difference , he'd think: "jeez these are hard questions for actual grown ups , I'll just have to blather my way through it with name calling and maybe some gibberish about how nuclear weapons affect manufacturing in Michigan"

reply

If Trump was given them ahead

But he wasn’t, she was, and she still didn’t answer any of them. All she did was evade and lie.

reply

No competent person needed to be supplied the questions. That’s retarded.

And yet, Scamala did, thanks for confirming that only a retard requires the questions ahead of time. lmao

reply

Harris came off as smart, a woman with a plan for our country, not fearful of her opponent and most of all, a winner. Kamala Harris slayed Trump and looked strong doing it. Trump, with his tired rhetoric and lies will not win this election. Harris put the kabash on that notion in this debate.

Harris has stated she will debate Trump again on FOX. Trump is not committing to it......yet. I think he would be smart not to debate this woman again in public.

reply

What is this "plan" you speak of? Specifically.

reply

Trump came off in many ways like the current state of his movement:

Old, whiny, deranged, recycled in talking points, pathetic, sexually insecure (has anyone seen Melania by the way? Is she okay?), incoherent, rambly, poorly planned, tired, cringe, conspiratorial, racist, unfocused, angry, impulsive and self-centered.


Look folks, it's been a fun 8 years but let's just move pass this. If you're bored of the same 4 memes and ghetto drama that keep unfolding each day, you know what you need to do this November.

reply

None of this matters when he's leading in early voting. The man is going to win so the sooner you miserable liberals come to terms with this, the sooner we can get started on that so called "UNITY" you speak of

TRUMP 2024: SAVE AMERICA AGAIN

reply

"Media consensus"? The mainstream, Dem-captured news media's consensus has about as much credibility as their "fact checking". (Zero)

reply

The media is against the Donald, and would say that anyway.
There was no mention about how Harris took the bait, and continuously made smarmy faces not realizing she was on camera. She did not cackle though.

reply