Felon - possible 136 years ?
DJT = Felon ... 34 felony counts,
each count carrying a possible 4 years in prison. 136 years! Whew.
Not only do you have TDS, you're a pot-stirring sensationalist and complete idiot for even entertaining such an absurd possibility! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ySJtn6oCUA π
shareWatch your blood pressure Felon-lover.
shareWhy did felon need to be capitalized by you? Another juvenile attempt on your part to emphasize that label even more and glory in it? Even your idol, grandpa, pedo Biden has decided to back off on using it for awhile as opposed to what was originally planned. Felon labelers are like homophobes in the closet. How many have you possibly gotten away with?
Biden's son goes on trial on FELONY federal gun charges next week. Wonder if we'll see any real justice in that trial.
FELON
shareYou must have gotten away with a lot of them. π
shareHow does that make sense?
shareIt's now just another very convenient label to hurl at him, like racist or misogynist, which is what sanctimonious, malicious pricks like you do, because you're incapable of criticizing with any semblance of logic. In other words, it's projection. Now that I've had to lead you by the hand and explain it, does it make any more sense to your kindergarten mentality?
shareYou're funny!
shareOr rapist. π€·π»ββοΈ
shareWho really cares about Hunter Biden. He's not running for office or involved in any official government business. The fact that he is going on trial is solely because his father is President
shareQuestion: If this had been Joe Biden in Trump's place, I'm guessing the Jury would've came back and said "Oh, he's an elderly man, no big deal" like they used for the excuse of leaving Classified Documents in his dirty garage next to his prized corvette, right?? Well?? How about it?? π€
shareCome on now. If Biden had told the feds to f*ck off like Trump did, he might need a good lawyer like Trump refused to get. But Biden did not tell the feds to f*ck off when he got caught with classified document sin his house. See how that works?
shareThe feds that ran an operation to cover up Biden's son laptop, WHILE TRUMP WAS THEIR BOSS?
Those feds would bring the hammer down on Biden?
DUDE, WHATEVER YOU ARE SMOKING, smoke less, it is making you CRAZY.
Trump said he could do anything per the Constitution. Why did Trump decide to let Biden slide? Trump is not very big on holding people accountable for their crimes. Notice how he let Clinton off the hook as soon as he was elected?
Are you telling me that Trump is some kind of doormat who can't do a damn thing? I think you are.
So, that point you raised about the feds treatment of Biden being based on his different behavior?
YOu're just dropping that? You aren't defending it...
Are you admitting that my point is thus correct, that they are clearly partisan?
Why would I defend the treatment Biden got when I am hopping Biden is put on trial for mishandling classified documents?
Biden got away with his crime because the FBI did not have to come and get those documents from his house like they did with Trump. That does not mean I want Biden to continue to evade justice for his crimes.
Do you think there will be any GOP leader who will demand justice for Biden's crimes? I know Trump and his supporters will not lift a finger to go after Biden just like they decided to let Clinton slide in 2016.
What is your point? That the Trump administration let Hunter Biden slide instead of arresting him when they have the chance? Remember, Trump claims he could have had Hunter Biden arrested.
Dude. You're ignoring the point.
Biden got a pass, Trump got the hammer. Your defense was based on the idea tha the FBI was treating them differently based on their behavior.
I refuted that. You came back pretending to have forgotten what we were talking about.
Having different standards of "justice" is not justice. It is politcal oppression.
I am not ignoring it. I know Biden got a pass and I wish he did not get a pass. Why do you think the FBI treated them differently?
Biden allegedly gave back the classified documents and the National Archives was satisfied. Trump refused their request, so the FBI got involved.
How is it that you do not understand that this is why Trump was treated differently?
This country needs to come down on people that mishandle classified documents. Putting Trump on trial for it is a good start. Also putting Biden and Pence on trial is even better.
Yes, different standards of justice is something the wealthy like Trump have enjoyed for a long long time. It has to stop. And it looks like some of those people are finding out what price they will have to pay.
If Trump is re-elected, what will you say when he refuses to bring Clinton, Pence and Biden to justice for their crimes?
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/05/17/politics/classified-documents-nara-former-presidents/index.html
I see that you reasserted your previous point.
My response is still the same. THe behavior of the fbi that I cited, shows that the feds treated them differently because they are heavily biased in Biden's favor.
Thus, their treatement of Trump is a violation of his rights and an act of politcial oppression.
Are you claiming that the FBI would have searched Trump's house even if the National Archives said they got all of their documents back? I think they would not.
shareI think that Trump is judged by a very different set of standards. As we have seen.
shareNope. He was not the first to be convicted on business fraud.
But in a way you are right. Trump was able to avoid responsibility for most of his screw-ups for decades. Even now he is allowed to remain free after the FBI collected the classified documents he stole from the White House. You or I would most likely be in jail without bail as we awaited trial.
I was comparing Trump to other members of the elite for a reason.
And Trump is being treated differently than his peers.
Exactly which "elite" are you comparing Trump to? Got the spine to provide a list of names?
Other presidents?
Other rapists?
Other businessmen who run numerous companies into bankruptcy?
Other criminals?
Other adulterers?
Other conmen?
While Trump is being treated differently than other presidents, it is only because Nixon was pardoned by Ford.
I've been talking about biden mostly and Hillary. Those the ones that you can really see the double standard.
You know this. Stop ... talking shit and just admit it.
Explain why you support it.
Why is it a double standard with Clinton? Trump insisted that she not be prosecuted. Are you claiming Trump made a mistake?
No other elites because those two? You have got to be kidding.
Explain why people should be held accountable for their crimes? It because of the crimes. Duh.
Becuase she got a pass. D'uh.
share Corbell (9122) 19 minutes ago SAID>>>>>>>>>
"I see that you reasserted your previous point.
My response is still the same. The behavior of the FBI that I cited, shows that the feds treated them differently because they are heavily biased in Biden's favor.
Thus, their treatment of Trump is a violation of his rights and an act of political oppression."
=================================================
Oh my goodness......how do you not understand that the difference in the treatment of Biden and Trump stems from the fact that Trump REFUSED to return many of the classified documents he kept at Mara Lago. This is why a search warrant was issued by the FBI for Mara Lago. On the other hand, Biden handed over the classified documents he had as soon as he was asked for them. THAT is the difference. Trump doesn't' even understand this because he is such a dufus. LOL.
Where is the evidence that the feds ran an operation to cover up Biden's son laptop?
shareOff the top of my head.
1. The way they used social media to suppress the story.
2. The way they used big meda to suppress the story.
3. The way that they avoided the laptop when they searched Guilani's home.
4. The way that they allowed the cia to lie to the American people about the laptop being russian disinformation, when they knew it was not. That btw, strong indicates a JOINT fbi cia operation on this. Authorized by who? AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND TRUMP.
5. i'M sure that there is more. I haven't been following this story closely.
I heard all about the Biden laptop. Sounds like they suck at suppressing a story.
Why did Trump not do anything about the laptop while he was president? He had ample opportunity to do so. He claims he could have done something.
I heard that the cia thought it was russian disinformation. That is what the cia retired leaders said. That is what Biden said during the Presidential debates to the American people.
The story was suppressed, and spun and a massive disinformation campaign made it a non issue in the election.
And actually the point isn't even how good of a job they did. THe point is that their ATTEMPT at it, shows that they are operating not based on their professional responsibilities to serve the nation's interests, or even to obey their bosses orders,
but they are operating, using US tax payer money, and the power of the state,
for their OWN POLITICAL GOALS.
That is terrifying. And they are clearly allied with Biden and against Trump and the portion of the Country that are Trump supporters.
I bet you hear lots of things that are not true. Got any evidence to back up your claims?
How did they suppress anything if everyone still knew? If we all knew, what credible evidence do you have that they even tried to suppress anything?
You go ahead and be scared of your own shadow, I have better things to do.
Here is that right wing rag the new york times talking about it.
The article also references at least SIX cia officials or ex officals testifying in front of congress about it. So, that would be more documentnation is you want it.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/16/us/politics/republicans-hunter-biden-laptop.html
And it is a big difference between people like ME hearing about it, and the average voter knowing that Biden's son was a drug addict who was being given millions by foriegn businessmen.
The story was suppressed. That was the cover up i mentioned. Thus, the double standard and the bias is supported.
I cannot read that article as I don't have an account.
The people who are happy with a president actually putting his children to work in the Capitol with a salary being paid by us taxpayers should not have a problem with the mere existence of a president's son who is not being paid by the taxpayers.
But that is the difference between Trump and Biden. The MAGA will make any excuse at all for Trump, but not give an inch for Biden.
So Trump deserves to go to jail for the stories that were suppressed on his behalf also?
Trump gave his kids jobs that they actually do.
Biden used his son as a bag man to collect money from foreign businessmen.
YOU are the one making an excuse for BIDEN, refusing to admit what was clearly happening.
AND, my point anyways was about the FEDS covering it up and thus demonstrating that they are partisan and weaponized by the dems against the republicans.
You seem so angry lately. I guess watching your orange master being convicted of 34 felonies really upset you. How much more bullshit from are you willing to take from Trump before you see that he is a moron and doesn't even know you exist?
shareI am pretty angry. Watching a Presidential candidate being convicted in a kangeroo court, IN AMERICA, is deeply upsetting to me.
The implications for my country and our future, is terrifying.
Trolls like you who constantly pepper their posts with shit talk like "orange master", doesn't help.
You ever talk to people like that, in real life, or only online?
If the Trump kiddies' job was to screw up everything they did and manage to make billions from foreign agents while doing so, then yes, they actually did their jobs.
If what Hunter Biden did was illegal, then why did Trump let him slide? Trump said he could bring Biden to justice? It seems that trump is all about letting people slide. Maybe he can get an honorary medal for it.
You seem to know a lot about things that were covered up. When it comes to covering things up, I guess they really suck at it. Or maybe they were not?
1. Hunter was clearly the bag man for his dad. Why do you support this?
2. The information became widely available AFTER the voting was done. That was a successful cover up. This is a pretty simple concept. The way you are playing dumb to avoid dealing with it, why are you doing that?
Where is your clear proof? If it was so clear, why did Trump let him slide? What do you know that Trump did not?
Tell me more about exactly which info became clear and when. It seems that you claim have special knowledge that no one else had, even Trump.
Not dumb. The dummies are those who will never explain why Trump let these people slide. You even get evasive when I ask why Trump let Clinton slide.
1. The crackhead was not getting paid for work he did. That is silly. He was collecting bribes for his dad.
2. The TRUTH about the laptop was buried under dem lies, until after the voting was done. Why do you support this?