That is not what title 18 says. Why not post a link to the law instead of making up your own version? That way no one has to decide if the stupid crap you post is true or not.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/611
(c) Subsection (a) does not apply to an alien if—
(1) each natural parent of the alien (or, in the case of an adopted alien, each adoptive parent of the alien) is or was a citizen (whether by birth or naturalization);
(2) the alien permanently resided in the United States prior to attaining the age of 16; and
(3) the alien reasonably believed at the time of voting in violation of such subsection that he or she was a citizen of the United States.
The words "reasonably believe" are plenty different than "believe". It is like "reaonable doubt" for a jury, not just "doubt". If an alien over stays their visa or just enters without authorization, they cannot reasonably believe that they are citizens. Do you think you would walk over the border and believe that you are a citizen without naturalization? Even tvfan is not that stupid, probably
reply
share
tvfan (12729)
6 months ago
It doesn't matter what you or I believe or how you choose to interpret that title, that loophole allows them to vote if they believe that they are citizens at the time they voted.
The millions of illegals that have been deliberately allowed into our country is confirmation of that.
The federal government doesn't care about your cited sources of the law.
They bend, break and twist the laws to fit their narrative and agendas.
Are you that gullible and naive or just playing stupid as usual?
reply
share
Ranb (9595)
6 months ago
No. Not if they believe, it's if they reasonably believe. Are you that gullible and naive or just playing stupid as usual?
reply
share
tvfan (12729)
6 months ago
[–] Ranb (7549) 4 minutes ago
No. Not if they believe, it's if they reasonably believe.
Finally, you admit it. Well done.
Your Welcome.
reply
share
Ranb (9595)
6 months ago
You still do not understand the difference between your version of the law and the actual law?
reply
share
tvfan (12729)
6 months ago
It’s not my version of the law; you literally cited proof confirming that what I stated is true. lol
There is nothing to misunderstand or differentiate.
Your only defense is quibbling over the word “reasonably” which is open to whatever interpretation they decide on allowing the votes to count.
It’s their loophole to allow illegals to vote.
reply
share
Ranb (9595)
6 months ago
You misquoted the law, therefore it was your version of the law.
[–] tvfan (9092) 15 hours ago
"Title 18 states that a non citizen (illegal) can vote in federal elections without penalty if at the time they are voting they believe themselves to be U.S. citizens
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/611
(3) the alien reasonably believed at the time of voting in violation of such subsection that he or she was a citizen of the United States.
Everyone else can see the difference in your version and the real law. Why can't you?
reply
share
tvfan (12729)
6 months ago
I didn't misquote anything and I didn't cite you "my own laws", you did and thereby proving and confirming that I was right (three times).
Attempting to use sophistry and semantics to backpedal will not help your case. lol
reply
share
itsbananas2024 (1744)
6 months ago
"Not if they believe, it's if they reasonably believe."
Who decides what is within reason?
reply
share
Ranb (9595)
6 months ago
tvfan should change her name to Judge "I am the law!!!" Dredd. Hahahahaha
reply
share
Ranb (9595)
6 months ago
A judge or jury decides, usually. You ever serve on a jury and get instructions from a judge?
reply
share