MovieChat Forums > Donald Trump Discussion > Doesn't like the 1st Amendment

Doesn't like the 1st Amendment


Trump told donors he will crush pro-Palestinian protests, deport demonstrators
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-told-donors-he-will-crush-pro-palestinian-protests-deport-demonstrators/ar-BB1n7F9z

Former president Donald Trump promised to crush pro-Palestinian protests on college campuses, telling a roomful of donors — a group that he joked included “98 percent of my Jewish friends” — that he would expel student demonstrators from the United States, according to participants in the roundtable event with him in New York.

“One thing I do is, any student that protests, I throw them out of the country. You know, there are a lot of foreign students. As soon as they hear that, they’re going to behave,” Trump said on May 14, according to donors at the event.

When one of the donors complained that many of the students and professors protesting on campuses could one day hold positions of power in the United States, Trump called the demonstrators part of a “radical revolution” that he vowed to defeat. He praised the New York Police Department for clearing the campus at Columbia University and said other cities needed to follow suit, saying “it has to be stopped now.”


Does Trump forget that everyone, including aliens, in the USA has 1st Amendment rights? Probably not. Trump is disgusted by the 1st Amendment as much as he is by the 2nd Amendment.

Trump knows that Americans are also protesting, where is he going to deport an American to?

reply

Are those the same soros-funded protestors?

reply

Does it matter? A person should be allowed to peacefully protest without being punished at all.

Is it your position that if a person is associated with Soros in any manner, they no longer have their civil rights?

reply

Tell that to the 400+ insurrectionist riots that burned down cities.

reply

You're changing the subject again.

reply

It's relevant, the OP is defending corporate sponsored protesters/rioters, same as the BLM riots.

reply

I made it clear I was defending peaceful protesters. You're the one bringing violent activities into the discussion.

reply

No such thing as peaceful leftist protesters, they will even incite a riot when pretending to be Trump supporters ... eg. J6.

reply

I said peaceful protesters, not leftist protesters

Which leftists were rioting on J6? Why did Trump let them slide? Was it because Trump was a DS doormat?

Was Ashili Babbit a violent leftist, aka antifa?

reply

There have been 400+ leftist riots and one right-wing protest incited by leftists rioters.

There were 200+ leftists embedded in the J6 crowds of 2,000-2,500 protesters.

Was Ashili Babbit a violent leftist, aka antifa?

No, she was not, you already knew that, don't play dumb.

reply

Where are you getting your data from? Who were the +200 leftists embedded in the J6 crowds? Why didn't Trump have them arrested? Trump claimed he could do it. Was that just another Trump lie?

Then why were people trying to convince others that Babbitt was antifa shortly after she was shot?

reply

He couldn't have them arrested because he was stripped of his CIC powers on J6.

Then why were people trying to convince others that Babbitt was antifa shortly after she was shot?

DS psyops trying to deceive the public.

reply

Trump was in office until two weeks later when Biden was sworn in. Don't be so damn stupid.

Why is it too much to expect you to read our Constitution and actually understand what it means?

Twentieth Amendment, Section 1:

The terms of the President and the Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the 3d day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin.

reply

LMAO, since when has congress followed everything in the Constitution?

Btw, "certain powers" can be stripped without replacing/removing the POTUS.

Yes, his CIC powers were revoked by the military brass during the J6 Capitol riot.

This was confirmed by DC National Guard whistleblower that testified before the House Administration Committee.

START THE COURT MARTIAL PROCEEDINGS: DC National Guard Whistleblower Alleges Trump’s Commander-in-Chief Powers Were Revoked by Military Brass During January 6 Capitol Riot

Matthews says that senior military leadership essentially stripped the president of his authority as commander-in-chief by preemptively planning to go against orders because they didn’t like the optics of uniformed soldiers at the Capitol.

Oh, and yeah, those court-martials started in Jan of this year.

reply

Congress? What did Congress do to trump that stripped his powers between January 6th and January 20th? Nothing.

The president is the Commander in Chief. The military cannot strip the president's powers. There you go again, calling Trump a doormat.

Had any military commander actually done what Matthews claims, then any president would have brought that person up on charges and had them fired. There you are, calling Trump a doormat again.

Where are you getting this crap from? Why can't you post a link? Your chickensh*t posts are silly

reply

Anyone competent enough can use my post and find all the sources necessary to verify.

I tried providing you with links when I first started posting on this board and you responded with nothing less than gaslighting, deflections and denialism.

Had any military commander actually done what Matthews claims, then any president would have brought that person up on charges and had them fired.

He was temporarily stripped of certain presidential powers, not CIC title.

What did Congress do to trump that stripped his powers between January 6th and January 20th?

They accused him of inciting an insurrection on J6 and they started an impeachment process that lasted one month.

reply

I am not the only person responding to your posts.

If you provide the link you were reading, quote the relevant portion of that link, then ensure your comments do not misrepresent what the link says, then you are in the clear.

Otherwise, given your history here, I think many of the people that read your unsupported claims, just assume that you are lying, again. Like you did up above. Just like Trump, I assume that everything you post here is a lie, until proven otherwise. That is the only way to be safe.

Am I wasting my time asking you to provide a link to show that Trump was stripped of presidential powers? Of course I am.

You're are claiming that Trump was still CiC during and after J6, but had no authority over our military? What kind of sense does that make? There is that doormat again. You keep on presenting Trump as some kind of doormat. Why is that?

Your lies are so stupid, it is easy to prove you wrong. Trump was pardoning people right up to January 20th 2021. So much for your Trump "stripped of presidential powers" nonsense. https://www.justice.gov/pardon/pardons-granted-president-donald-j-trump-2017-2021

reply

it is easy to prove you wrong.

With what? your usual fake news, propaganda and internet scriptures.

You refuse to find the sources because you don't care for truth and facts.
You prefer your own narrative.

Oh, and those pardons after J6 were already signed, they were only granted on those dates. Try again.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think many of the people that read your unsupported claims, just assume that you are lying, again.

They can assume whatever they want, but we both know that you are the only here making the assumptions because you are too incompetent to do your own research.

Anyone else can simply research and verify everything that I have posted.

As I have already stated, providing links to people like you is a waste of time and effort.

The fact that you insist in wanting links is proof that you are disingenuous and don't care what the truth is.

Your only method of arguing is deflecting with sophistry, denials and citing propaganda that fits your narrative.

And btw, you are the only person that insists on labeling him a doormat and presuming/implying it on behalf of others.

reply

If you read the pdf files associated with the page, it shows that Trump signed the pardons on the dates the page indicates. Can't you come up with some lies are are harder to disprove? Your lies are kind of boring.

reply

The page dates and the written dates above his signature is for when they were granted.

He signed them prior to J6.

reply

Prove it.

reply

People like tvfan are never going to give their sources and we know why, they are conspiracy bullshit websites. When they get deservedly lambasted for using terrible sources of information, they feel attacked and double down.

Its exhausting trying to reason with someone who is fundamentally apposed to reality. It's amazing how far people will go just to keep from being wrong or accepting personal responsibility for poor judgement.

reply

bullshit websites. When they get deservedly lambasted for using terrible sources of information, they feel attacked and double down.

Now that's what I call projection; especially since leftoids are well known for citing fake news, propaganda and internet scriptures that fit their narrative.

And you leftoids only consider certain websites as bullshit when right-wingers cite them, but okay when leftoids conveniently use those same sources.

reply

I provided you a link to documents signed by then president Trump. You said they were not real, in that the dates were wrong. If you won't believe Trump, who will you believe?

reply

A link to documents that he signed prior to J6.

reply

This one has his signature dated 1/20/2021. https://www.justice.gov/pardon/file/1118161/dl?inline

reply

Nope, the dates written above the signature is when it was granted which is the same date as it is on the page where all those pdfs are listed.

They were all signed prior to J6.

reply

Link to the page then.

reply

The topic wasn't the BLM protests and he never said he supported them when you made that comment. You just made an assumption that he's pro-BLM to deflect his claim.

reply

There's nothing to deflect.

99% of the protests/riots have been BLM/Leftists.

The current protests mentioned by the OP are leftists; same as BLM.

The OP is using the 1st-A as an excuse to demonize Trump while feigning support for the free-speech rights of the protestors.

it's a typical Ranb tactic that he thinks will fool others into falling for his sophistry trap.

He does the same for almost all his posts and replies. He's predictable.

reply

Those BLM and Antifa riots all happened under Trump's presidency. He didn't even lift a finger to help any of the communities effected by those riots. Trump only cares about himself. You are a retard because you worship Trump.

reply

Such a bullshitter as usual.

Democrat Governors tied the hands of Police Officers, while they criticized Trump’s repeated pleas to “bring in the National Guard.”

Instead, Democrat Politicians chose to encourage their supporters to keep rioting, while the media claimed the riots were “Fiery, but peaceful.”

Same as the Capitol protest; Trump spent most of J6 calling in the National Guard, but his underlings/advisors betrayed him by ignoring him.

reply

You are a retard because you worship Trump and your stupidity and gullibility is astounding. You should keep the Suicide Hotline on speed dial because Trump is losing everything. How will you cope? Goodnight, Goober.

reply

This isn't about BLM though. It's about the Palestine protesters. You can literally do this with anything.

reply

Same thing, both are Soros leftist protesters.

reply

Why doesn't the right just supposedly hire these protesters?

reply

You tell them. I was referring to peaceful protesters. The ones that simply yell and wave signs. Rioters and arsonists are not peaceful.

reply

Although there are 33 replies so far no one has responded to the topic at hand.

reply