Standard lib tactic, pretending to forget their own argument.
Recall, dumbass, that your position is that Trump's claim that Pelosi turned down the 10k soldiers made no sense, because the Capitol Police would make that call, and Pelosi as Speaker of the House had no connection or authority over them.
But now we see that that is not true. The Capitol police report up to the House, of which Pelosi is in charge.
NOw, when they are discussing shit like, fixing a parking ticket for some high level asshole, i am sure that the Sargent might make that call himself, but something like 10k military forces as backup? That goes to the top, ,and in this chain of command, that would be Pelosi.
Thus, we see that your argument against Trump, is completely false, and amusingly we see it proved by your own link.
If you had an ouch of shame or human decency, this is where you would admit that you were wrong. And aplogize for what a shit you were about it.
But, then you wouldn't be a lefty in the first place, so I await your bizarre otherworldly explanation as to why this does NOT blow your false position completely to shreds.
reply
share
BKB (11314)
a year ago
Any time a Liberal is wrong about something or can't answer the question, they deflect with the bullshit name calling.. I mean, the obsession with this 1 man in Donald Trump is something to behold, that this man could get this many liberals worked up simply can't be healthy when it comes to their sanity??
reply
share
Ranb (11342)
a year ago
Let's get back to the fact that you have no evidence to back up your claim. Can you show me any rule or regulation that says the Speaker makes that kind of call on soldiers?
Why are you hurling insults and demanding apologies instead of proving evidence to back up your claims? Are you that empty inside?
reply
share
Corbell (11002)
a year ago
1. You want "proof" of a verbal offer between Trump and Pelosi? LOL.
2. The Speaker is in charge of the House.
3. Dude. You've been rude as fuck. That bit where you can dish it out but whine like a fag when you get some back? Keep doing that, it lets people know to laugh at you.
reply
share
Ranb (11342)
a year ago
You make a claim, you prove it. Your insults are not proof.
Bring in charge of the House does not mean being in charge of the soldiers that can be called upon in an emergency. Where is the proof to support your claims?
I don't care if you think I'm rude. I'm just saying your insults are not an effective way of convincing anyone with a brain that you are correct.
reply
share
Corbell (11002)
a year ago
Only a dishonest asshole would demand "proof" of a discussion.
LOL.
My being rude to you is not about convincing anyone, but about treating you with the level of respect you have earned.
reply
share
Ranb (11342)
a year ago
No. If you make a claim, then be prepared to prove it. Why should anyone hesitate to demand prove of any claim that is ever made?
Surely you have some reason to believe a discussion has taken place other than your over active imagination?
reply
share
Corbell (11002)
a year ago
Only a dishonest ass would demand "proof" of a discussion.
I do have reason to believe that the discussion took place. Pelosi's defense was that the offer was not formally made. That is an implicit admission that it was informally made.
reply
share
tvfan (14553)
a year ago
You will only get the following from Ranb:
1. Lies.
2. Off-topic questions as deflections.
3. Make 'presumptions' and 'opinions' for you.
4. Internet scriptures.
5. No counter arguments.
reply
share
Corbell (11002)
a year ago
The worst part is, in that he is a fine representative of libtards as a general group.
reply
share
Ranb (11342)
a year ago
The same reason to believe that the Earth is flat, the British royal family are lizard people and the moon landings were fake?
The thing is, you make up crap you have no rational reasons to believe is true, then get all kinds of upset if people on the forum don't swallow your crap hook line and sinker while patting you on the back the entire time.
You are one of those delicate flowers who shoots off their mouth from the relative security of the internet without any repercussions.
You should try getting out in the real world to make a difference some day. You are not doing anything at here.
reply
share
Corbell (11002)
a year ago
Why did Pelosi state that the offer was not FORMALLY made?
reply
share
Ranb (11342)
a year ago
I did not hear or see her saying this. Got a link? I understand that Trump claims she said something, but you're not stupid enough to actually believe anything Trump says that is not actually confirmed, are you?
Trump has repeated bragged about how he can do anything he wants as president. Trump could have, in his position as commander in Chief, ordered soldiers to the Capitol to secure it while the electoral vote was counted. It seems that Trump decided a riot that disrupted the vote counts was what he needed.
reply
share
Corbell (11002)
a year ago
From YOUR link.
"She says that that request was never officially made," Welker, who newly took over the NBC program from former host Chuck Todd, interjected.
That fits nicely with Trump's statement. He makes the verbal offer, she blows him off, then she covers her ass saying it was not "officially made".
Note, she didn't DENY what he said. She used weasel words. If she could have just called him a LIAR, she would have been happy to do so.
He seems that Trump really offered to give them 10k troops, just like he said.
Which makes NO sense, if he was planning a riot to disrupt the vote count.
reply
share