MovieChat Forums > Kristen Stewart Discussion > Will she ever be nominated for a mainstr...

Will she ever be nominated for a mainstream award ??


Oscar, Golden Globe or SAG ?

reply

I think she has a good chance at it, just like any actor/actress who plays in depth, challenging roles. She won a French Cesar award, French equivalent of an Oscar and one of the few American actors who have won such an award. Won a BAFTA award for young rising actress. She does many Independent and artsy type films portraying interesting characters and as such she's been nominated and won many film festival awards for her roles. These are usually smaller films and as such don't get a lot of mainstream buzz.

I think whatever awards she wins, she seems to enjoy and seek the more interesting and challenging type roles which are often in smaller Independent type films. Those films tend to focus around characters, character development and such which can make for good, immersive story lines.

reply

For sure. They're gonna give her tons of awards. When she gets a little older, she'll come back in style, have a huge resurgence, get all the big drama movies.

reply

Kristen has already been nominated for a SAG award.

Granted, it was not for a solo performance, but instead was in the Best Performance by a Cast category for Into the Wild. That was a nomination only, as the cast did not win the award.

Taking that into account, I can understand if you do not wish to count that as an actual nomination, since it was not for either the lead or supporting actress categories. That is your prerogative to do so. I do however believe that the Screen Actors Guild does count it as a nomination, as she was invited to, and did attend, the award ceremony that year.

As to what the future holds, hey, I have no idea, although I do think that her best chance for Golden Globe consideration will be for 'Against All Enemies,' where she plays Jean Seberg. Knowing what Jean Seberg went through, I just think that the Hollywood Foreign Press will take an interest in that film. Then again, considering that I have not seen even one single second of Kristen's performance in the film, I could be completely wrong. But what the hell, sometimes it is fun to speculate about such things.

reply

Kristen should have received an Oscar nomination for her performance in Clouds of Sils Maria as she won awards from the most prestigious film critics groups in the world, which are usually precursors to receiving an Academy Award nom: The New York Film Critics Circle (First Place), Los Angeles Film Critics Association (Second Place), Boston Society of Film Critics (First Place), and the National Society of Film Critics (First Place).

I say this because anyone would be hard pressed to find an actress who won a first place award from NYFCC, along with a plethora of other prestigious critics group awards, who didn't receive an Oscar nom.

reply

"I say this because anyone would be hard pressed to find an actress who won a first place award from NYFCC, along with a plethora of other prestigious critics group awards, who didn't receive an Oscar nom. "

Yeah, and that's why I feel there's a disconnect between what's happening in films and what the Oscar crew considers. Not just Kristen but for other actors as well.

reply

Yeah, and that's why I feel there's a disconnect between what's happening in films and what the Oscar crew considers. Not just Kristen but for other actors as well.


Like I was telling Texas Jack, I believe it had a lot to do with the Academy allowing the line between what constitutes a Best Actress and Best Supporting Actress performance to be blurred--or as some would call, category fraud. And of course politics also come into play. But that being said, I was hugely disappointed that neither was she recognized by the Independent Spirit Awards voters, as she was also snubbed in their Best Supporting Female category that year.

A while back on IMDb, one poster told me that her failure to receive a major acting award nomination has nothing to do with her talent as an actress but more to do with her penchant for portraying controversial roles such as in Camp X-Ray and Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk. This is why I'll say beforehand that even if she swings for the fences and knocks it out of the park in her upcoming role in Against All Enemies, she could get snubbed again, as portraying the Jean Seberg character may be too controversial a role for AA voters to stomach.

If that's the case, I'm surprised that more members of the actors branch of the Academy don't take issue with the snubbing of actors who seek to portray truth--well at least from the perspective of the filmmakers and cast involved. What message does it send to directors, screenwriters and actors who feel compelled to use their craft to speak the truth to the best of their abilities, if they find out they are being censored in such a way? Is the film industry supposed to recognize and reward only the ones who play safe, are politically correct and choose uncontroversial roles?

Case in point: I never thought I would see the day when a superhero film (Black Panther) would receive a Best Picture Oscar nomination, a Writers Guild of America nom for its screenplay as well as winning the SAG ensemble cast award. I naively thought these awards were reserved for the upper echelon of visionary directors who would adapt the work of world-class screenwriters who crafted hard-hitting storylines which were then acted out by dramatic actors who would then churn out gritty performances. Don't get me wrong, Black Panther was one of my fave films of 2018--but so were a host of superhero/sci-fi actioners which were released over the past several decades who never received nor expected such lofty accolades. So it appears the paradigm shift is moving further and further away from Hollywood portraying the world literally as we know it and more toward depicting fantasy and the world we only wished and dreamed we were a part of.

reply

This is why I'll say beforehand that even if she swings for the fences and knocks it out of the park in her upcoming role in Against All Enemies, she could get snubbed again, as portraying the Jean Seberg character may be too controversial a role for AA voters to stomach.

I, on the otherhand, believe just the opposite, LL.

In portraying Jean Seberg in Against All Enemies, Kristen is portraying one of the Academy and Screen Actors Guild's own. Afterall, Jean Seberg was an actress and a member of SAG, and possibly (I'm not 100% sure about this) a voting member of the Academy.

Because of that, I believe that SAG and the Academy will actually embrace the controversy surrounding Jean Seberg's story, and thus I think that said controversy will work in Kristen's favor.

Hopefully, the screenplay and directing will work in Kristen's favor as well.

reply

"Case in point: I never thought I would see the day when a superhero film (Black Panther) would receive a Best Picture Oscar nomination, a Writers Guild of America nom for its screenplay as well as winning the SAG ensemble cast award. I naively thought these awards were reserved for the upper echelon of visionary directors who directed screenwriters who crafted hard-hitting storylines which were then acted out by dramatic actors who churn out gritty performances. Don't get me wrong, Black Panther was one of my fave films of 2018--but so were a host of superhero/sci-fi actioners which were released over the past several decades who never received nor expected such lofty accolades. So it appears the paradigm shift is moving further and further away from Hollywood portraying the world literally as we know it and more toward depicting fantasy and the world we only wished and dreamed we were a part of. "

I haven't seen Black Panther yet but I know it has gotten great reviews. But I understand and agree with what you say about the reasons for the awards. I wouldn't think that most superhero type films would garner such awards. That said, though not a superhero but a fantasy film, I can see films like Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings getting awards as there were great stories and amazingly well played roles.

reply

She was excellent in that. I don't recall what the competition looked like that year, but it looked like an award-worthy performance to me.

reply

There are two major reasons why I believe Kristen deserved an Oscar nomination for COSM:

As I mentioned previously, Kristen won more awards from the most prestigious films critics groups in the world than any actor or actress in 2015. While Alicia Vikander won the Los Angeles Film Critics Association First Place Award for her performance in Ex Machina, along with several other critics awards, none were as prestigious as Kristen's NYFCC win.

The second major reason was the category fraud which was quite rampant that year, as most of the actress who were nominated for a Best Supporting Actress Academy Award should have been nominated for a Best Actress Oscar instead. For example, Rooney Mara who was nominated for a Best Supporting Actress Oscar for "Carol", had more screen time than her costar Cate Blanchett who received a Best Actress Oscar nom. Many argue that Alicia Vikander should have been considered a co-lead in "The Danish Girl." And while Kate Winslett, Rachel McAdams, and Jennifer Jason Leigh all did not have more screen time than the lead male actors they costarred with, they all had more screen time than any of the other actresses in their respective films, "Steve Jobs", "Spotlight", and "The Hateful Eight." Perhaps this was a major reason why the critics gave the lion's share of their top critics awards to Kristen--her role in COSM was a true supporting role, in this case, she supported and had much less screen time than lead actress Juliette Binoche.

As far as who should have won the BSA Oscar in 2015, I will readily admit that Alicia Vikander was well deserving of it--not for her role in "The Danish Girl",the role which garnered her an Oscar--but for her mesmerizing performance in Ex Machina. Of course, the runner up BSA Oscar, if there were such a thing, would have to go to Kristen, for the aforementioned reasons. I was so impressed by these two performances that I decided to do these edits:

Alicia Vikander in "Ex Machina":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqreCqQJcpo

Kristen Stewart in "Clouds of Sils Maria":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_Wq5GHL3j0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMglD75M4aU&t=1s

reply

Depends, a lot of her choices of roles are very left field and not very commercial. Basically not Oscar award worthy, she's won awards aboard. But she's still young and you never know it could only take one film to get her into awards contention.

reply