Evans wanted to testify, but listened to his lawyer. He said it was hard as hell not to be able to tell the world he was innocent.
>> Police reports that had been submitted to obtain search warrants indicated at least two witnesses said Evans was involved in the Radin murder.
But of course you left out the next sentence: "when asked under oath if he knew Radin, Evans invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.[16] However, Greenberger later testified that Evans had no involvement in the crime.[17]"
Conveniently left that out, eh? Nice try.
reply
share
Stratego (30509)
5 years ago
Of course I left it out!
One, nothing in that sentence suggests he was never more than a "tangential character".
Two, YOU conveniently left out the next sentence that mentioned Greenberger's claim that she had been Evan's lover! How is she a reliable witness???
Again, of course he said he was willing to testify. He wanted to look good. Point is, he didn't testify!
I can't believe you're such a fool to use his word as evidence. I guess you believe John Wayne Gacy when he said he was innocent???
It's a fact that the DA refused to rule him out as a suspect.
reply
share
Interlepos (1807)
5 years ago
>>I can't believe you're such a fool to use his word as evidence.
You're a flaming fool yourself. Why wasn't he convicted if he was guilty? Why wasn't he charged? Why wasn't he put in jail?
Let me help you with that one, because he was innocent.
reply
share
Stratego (30509)
5 years ago
So you actually believe that all guilty people in the world have been charged and convicted? Is that honestly and truly what you believe??? Because that's simply mindboggling. I guess Al Capone never killed anyone either, right?
The DA said they didn't have enough evidence to charge him, but the fact they never ruled him out as a suspect is very telling.
Now you can continue to be a gullible fanboy and believe he's innocent, but don't go around telling people he's never been a suspect.
reply
share
Interlepos (1807)
5 years ago
Every case is different. You're comparing Robert Evans to Al Capone now?
Ok, son.
reply
share
Stratego (30509)
5 years ago
One, I'm not your or anyone's son.
Two, why shouldn't I compare them? Capone is a famous example of someone who was never charged and convicted of murder while everyone knows he's guilty. It proves your reasoning that Evans must be innocent makes no sense.
reply
share
Interlepos (1807)
5 years ago
Let's be civil and just agree to disagree. I believe Robert Evans was innocent. He didn't have the "murderer gene" inside him. And besides, Would Jack Nicholson hang around with a killer? Come on.
reply
share
Stratego (30509)
5 years ago
I never said you don't have the right to believe he's innocent. This was simply about the suggestion that he was never a suspect just because the guy himself said so.
Why wouldn't he? Nicholson isn't exactly the most scrupulous person in the world and it's a fact that Evans was a convicted drug trafficker. But do you think he knows more about the case than we do? Just like you, he probably just chooses to believe he's innocent, perhaps for personal reasons.
reply
share