She contradicts herself on the submissive thing

Ive seen interviews where she tries to explain what being submissive means...and im not sure I understand what she means..im not sure she even knows what she means.

She says submissive means letting her husband make decisions for the family. Then turns around and says she is a strong opinionated woman and that her husband always consults her when making decisions,..so, how are you being submissive when your husband asks for your opinion?

If you were truly submissive, wouldnt you just go with whatever he says?

What if he said okay honey, i want to move to NYC. And she didnt want to move. If she voices her opinion then wouldnt that be not being submissive? Would she have to end up moving even if she truly didnt want to, just because her husband said to?

What if her husband decides he wants to invest a large chunk of their money into somethjng she knows wont work out...would she have to go along with it anyway if her husband demanded it?

If thats the case then seems like the male would have quite a bit of power over the females

I dont get it. Does she get it?

It sounded like she threw that submissive stuff out there to let conservatives know shes one of them..then got flack for it, so she backtracked and tried to put a positive strong woman spin on it,