Impeach Joe Biden Immediately - Joe Biden Discussion

[–] TriumphReq (1857) 4 years ago

Everything about that page reads like bald face propaganda. You are one gullible lemming.

reply

[–] millsey72 (10943) 4 years ago

No worries. People like that soon will get censored from the web along with every other conservative voice in America. Everyone is being watched these days

reply

[–] TimMC (9143) 4 years ago

You can't impeach a GOAT.

reply

[–] onemanarmy82 (1764) 4 years ago

What about a jackass? THAT is exactly what Biden is!

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

That's why they shot the GOAT in Dallas in 1963.

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

No one really wants to get rid of him because they know if he is impeached, is removed or dies... we then get the communist cunt Kamala. So frankly Pedo-Joe is the less of the two evils.

reply

[–] blue1981 (8188) 4 years ago

If the Republicans regain the House and Senate I'd like to see Joe removed by the 25th amendment and Kamala impeached. Kamala endorsed and funded domestic terrorism last summer by bailing out rioters last year. I doubt either scenario would happen but if the House and Senate flip in 2022 their last two years are a lame duck.

reply

[–] asom (6894) 4 years ago

The 25th can be invoked only by the whitehouse (VP). So ... no.

reply

[–] cyguration (3951) 4 years ago

lol... if they cheated in the 2020 elections (as evident with the Arizona audit) why wouldn't they cheat in the 2022 mid-terms?

reply

[–] strntz (12773) 4 years ago

I think Heels Harris is actually running the show anyway, so removing Biden will only add an unknown VP.

reply

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

Pelosi would be VP.

reply

[–] strntz (12773) 4 years ago

While Pelosi is currently third in the order of succession, the new President gets to pick his/her own VP that needs to be confirmed by a simple majority of both houses.

If Biden and Harris go down on Hillary airlines, then Pelosi would be *acting* president automatically if I understand the law correctly.

reply

[–] Ziggy (1913) 4 years ago

Are you honestly suggesting that he should be impeached because he said that if someone chooses to remain unvaccinated, that person would be more likely to catch the virus and therefore get sick, thus "pay the price?"

Would you also want to impeach him if he mentioned that choosing drop out of school might make it harder to find a job? Or that if you take out loans to pay for your college education, you would initially have less spending money as you work to pay back the loans?

It's odd that you would suggest someone needed to be impeached for stating such an obvious fact.

reply

[–] UncleRuckis (2637) 4 years ago

Ever since that grifter Trump got impeached twice(both times for very transparent offenses), conservatives feel that impeachment is just a political weapon to wielded at the drop of a hat. All the more reason to make damn sure these asshats don't retake the house and Senate(which is tough since the current electoral system is heavily rigged in favor of them doing just that).

reply

[–] Ziggy (1913) 4 years ago

You do know that "transparent" refers to whether or not it was secretive, not whether or not it was serious, right?

Threatening to withhold aid unless they dig up dirt on your opponent is pretty serious. Inciting a riot is even more frightening.

Just because Trump thinks he's above the law, doesn't mean what he did was ok.

reply

[–] UncleRuckis (2637) 4 years ago

Transparent: easy to perceive or detect.

I know what I said. One offense was done basically on Twitter for the whole world to see and the other was recorded on official White House audio records and was an obvious violation of the law.

reply

[–] Ziggy (1913) 4 years ago

I seriously owe you an apology. I didn't bother to realize you weren't arguing with me.

reply

[–] UncleRuckis (2637) 4 years ago

lol it happens.

reply

[–] trevorh321 (5495) 4 years ago

Sure. Why not? Trump was impeached over a phone call accused of doing something Biden admitted to doing himself.

He was impeached a second time for encouraging people to protest peacefully!

reply

[–] UncleRuckis (2637) 4 years ago

Peacefully??? They wanted to execute the VP!

reply

[–] trevorh321 (5495) 4 years ago

No kidding? How do you know that?

reply

[–] UncleRuckis (2637) 4 years ago

They're on video during the riot chanting "hang Mike Pence!" There aren't too many ways to interpret that!

reply

[–] Kowalski (79128) 4 years ago

TRUMP DID NOT TELL ANYONE TO HANG ANYONE,OR USE ANY FORCE OR VIOLENCE...JACKASSES MAKE THEIR OWN JACKASS DECISIONS.

reply

[–] UncleRuckis (2637) 4 years ago

He egged these lunatics on every day for months, had his little stop the steal rally the morning of, and then unleashed them on the Capitol building. To say he bears no responsibility here is insane.

reply

[–] Kowalski (79128) 4 years ago

LMAO...YOU SIR ARE A HARD PASS.🙂

reply

[–] trevorh321 (5495) 4 years ago

Ummmmmm.ok?

reply

[–] asom (6894) 4 years ago

And did Trump tell them to do that? Have a record of him saying that? (Execute the VP)

reply

[–] UncleRuckis (2637) 4 years ago

Lol you know full well that wasn't Trumps style. He was the king of dog whistles!

Doesn't matter now though. He's impeached, he's gone, and we need to move the country forward.

reply

[–] asom (6894) 4 years ago

I'm just asking you when did trump asked his followers to be violent and even kill the VP.

That was your claim (or argument) - that they wanted to execute the VP at trump's orders ...

reply

[–] UncleRuckis (2637) 4 years ago

Read it again. I claimed no such thing. Someone said he said he was impeached for organizing a peaceful protest and I said it was in no way peaceful and here's why.

reply

[–] asom (6894) 4 years ago

read again. He didn't say such things. Trump didn't organize a protest, peaceful or not.

He encouraged people to peacefully protest (that's a different thing).

He's not to blame for how that protest turned out to be.

How about that democratic senator that was asking for non-peaceful protests in the case of Floyd??? Was that senator "impeached"?

reply

[–] cyguration (3951) 4 years ago

Notice they have no arguments once you get into the details of the Left's lies.

Also, ask them about the cops at the Capitol building purposely removing the barricade and telling the protestors to "Go, go, go!"

Here's the video for people who don't know what I'm talking about:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJiKVpHlLcU&ab_channel=SteveBlevins

reply

[–] Pete314 (3341) 4 years ago

Ehm...sorry, but as far as I know he's NOT impeached.

reply

[–] Mensa1856 (135) 4 years ago

Since New York is moving fast with CRIMINAL charges against Trump, how are you going to maneuver your lips to continue to kiss his ass?

reply

[–] asom (6894) 4 years ago

It's not ass kissing, it's just observing the facts. Facts that you lefties cannot see anymore due to indoctrination and hate.

We can take the video of his speech and you can point where he said "execute the VP" ...

reply

[–] Karl Aksel (1498) 4 years ago

Sure. Why not? Trump was impeached over a phone call accused of doing something Biden admitted to doing himself.

Except that is kind of the opposite of the truth.

reply

[–] trevorh321 (5495) 4 years ago

No it is not.

reply

[–] Karl Aksel (1498) 4 years ago

Yes, it is. Biden applied pressure to remove a corrupt official, because corruption was not being investigated. Biden wanted someone who would actually deal with corruption.

Trump did the exact opposite. Trump used government aid as leverage to get Ukraine to gather dirt on a political opponent, for his own personal gain. This is the very essence of corruption.

reply

[–] trevorh321 (5495) 4 years ago

Of course! The official was corrupt and Biden was doing Ukraine a favor! LOL

How do you liberals even sleep at night? Well, without a conscience you sleep like a baby.

reply

[–] Karl Aksel (1498) 4 years ago

Of course! The official was corrupt and Biden was doing Ukraine a favor! LOL

Yes, this is exceedingly well documented.

How do you liberals even sleep at night? Well, without a conscience you sleep like a baby.

You would know. You are either a mindless drone who will uncritically swallow anything Trump barfs out, or you are actually evil. Possibly a combination of the two.

reply

[–] trevorh321 (5495) 4 years ago

Show me the documentation. And why would the VPOTUS insert himself into Ukraine's matters anyways? And why would he threaten to withhold funds? This was not our business.

It's utterly disgusting how far the Dems have fallen. Biden was gloating about strong-arming Ukraine to get rid of a prosecutor, not because he was corrupt, but because Biden knew his son was receiving a lot of money for something he was not qualified and God knows what else would have been revealed.

And then, THEN, you decided to impeach Trump because he called for peaceful protest. That's all he did.

Dems did nothing as Antifa and BLM torched cities and assaulted people for months on end. THAT is evil.

reply

[–] Karl Aksel (1498) 4 years ago

Show me the documentation. And why would the VPOTUS insert himself into Ukraine's matters anyways? And why would he threaten to withhold funds? This was not our business.

Burisma is a holding company for energy production, especially natural gas. Corruption in such a company is bound to have an impact on international prices, and so it is in pretty much everyone's interest that corruption is rooted out. Which is why the EU, the US, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund all pressured Ukraine to get rid of Viktor Shokin - it wasn't just the US or Biden who wanted him out.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Shokin

It's utterly disgusting how far the Dems have fallen. Biden was gloating about strong-arming Ukraine to get rid of a prosecutor, not because he was corrupt, but because Biden knew his son was receiving a lot of money for something he was not qualified and God knows what else would have been revealed.

The only people claiming that are Viktor Shokin himself, and the Trumps. All interested parties, all with extensive histories of corruption. And you believe them. You actually believe them.

And then, THEN, you decided to impeach Trump because he called for peaceful protest. That's all he did.

No, he whipped his followers into a frenzy. He knew that the "stolen election" thing was just bullshit. How did he know? Because he's the one who made it up. He fed his followers lies, which led to protests even on election night. One election locale was even stormed by idiots who believed Trump's lies. At no point did Trump urge anyone to be peaceful. Just the opposite: at every turn when his constituency perpetrated despicable acts (such as forcing Biden campaigners out of Texas), he applauded them. He is the one who told them to march on Capitol Hill, and whatever cover-his-ass remark he may have made about how they should be peaceful was effectively drowned out by the rest of his hateful rhetoric. Any mention of being peaceful was brief, easy to miss, said as an aside. The things he reiterated were things like never give up, never surrender, fight like hell. Any idiot knows what message that sends to people. What happened on Jan. 6th was inevitable, given how Trump had prepped them. And Trump absolutely LOVED it.

reply

[–] trevorh321 (5495) 4 years ago

What garbage. You are bankrupt.

reply

[–] Karl Aksel (1498) 4 years ago

Feel free to point out any errors I may have made.

reply

[–] trevorh321 (5495) 4 years ago

There is no point. You spin every lie to benefit your party. I mean the idea Biden did that to HELP Ukraine, a country Obama didn't even bother to provide any military support in the face of Russian aggression, is ludicrous. By the way, Trump did provide them military support. Biden was trying to stop an investigation that would lead to his son. And we don't know what else.

You are bankrupt.

reply

[–] Karl Aksel (1498) 4 years ago

There is no point. You spin every lie to benefit your party.

Again, don't let me stop you from backing up your claims.

I mean the idea Biden did that to HELP Ukraine, a country Obama didn't even bother to provide any military support in the face of Russian aggression, is ludicrous.

You paint this as if helping the Ukraine with corruption was a HUGE thing, but helping them militarily would be a trifle. It's the complete other way around. Of course it was in America's interest to help Ukraine out of corruption, because Burisma is an energy company. Or, to be more precise, a holding company for energy companies. A holding company is essentially a company that owns other companies. Meaning corruption in a holding company will affect all its subsidiaries. In this case, it could lead to an increase in the prices of natural gas internationally. I mean, seriously: why do you think the entire EU and the US wanted Viktor Shokin out? What, you think the EU had some vested interest in helping the Bidens personally? o_O

And then you juxtapose this with providing military support against Russia. AGAINST RUSSIA. Like they want another cold war.

By the way, Trump did provide them military support.

Yes, on the condition that they help him personally.

Biden was trying to stop an investigation that would lead to his son.

Then how come the investigation took place? Biden SUCEEDED in what he set out to do, he did manage to get rid of Shokin, and there were NO obstacles to the investigations that took place. Which would hardly be the case if Biden did what he did for the reasons you claim, would it? Your conspiracy theory doesn't make any sense on any level; it is completely devoid of logic.

And we don't know what else.

We know the full story. You believe in a fantasy which was only allowed to exist by ignoring nearly all of the available evidence, and distorting the rest.

reply

[–] trevorh321 (5495) 4 years ago

You are blatantly ignoring what Biden ADMITS to doing. That makes you bankrupt. Instead of admitting he did something completely unethical as VP, you instead find ways to excuse what he did.

The ONLY reason Biden did that was because it involved his son. THAT IS IT. You would have to be a total moron not to see that.

This is only part of why the DNC is in the toilet.

reply

[–] Karl Aksel (1498) 4 years ago

You are blatantly ignoring what Biden ADMITS to doing.

I am glad you brought that up. WHAT did Biden admit to doing, exactly? If he did what he did for personal gain, or for his son's personal gain, do you really think he'd brag about it on TV? How dumb do you have to be to believe that?

Instead of admitting he did something completely unethical as VP, you instead find ways to excuse what he did.

What excuse? It's a matter of public record.

The ONLY reason Biden did that was because it involved his son. THAT IS IT. You would have to be a total moron not to see that.

On the contrary, you'd have to be a complete idiot to BELIEVE that. You're not even capable of looking further than the tip of your own nose: if Biden wanted to prevent investigation of his son, how come he didn't strong-arm Viktor Shokin's successor, Yuriy Lutsenko, in the same way? If Biden's motives were what you bizarrely insist they were, what could Biden possibly hope to gain by removing Shokin?

And you have yet to answer why EVERY country in the West wanted Shokin gone. What would they gain by this alleged Hunter Biden corruption?

I am beginning to think you are actually deranged, since you refuse to look at evidence, and refuse to reasonably examine your own position.

reply

[–] trevorh321 (5495) 4 years ago

You are bankrupt.

reply

[–] Karl Aksel (1498) 4 years ago

If you're going to reply with that, you'd be better off not replying at all. You are basically saying, "I know I'm wrong, I just don't want to admit it."

reply

[–] trevorh321 (5495) 4 years ago

I am saying you are useless. That is what bankrupt means.

reply

[–] Karl Aksel (1498) 4 years ago

And I'm pointing out that that's a useless reply. It doesn't become any less childish just because you replace "stupid" with something you think is more intellectual sounding.

reply

[–] trevorh321 (5495) 4 years ago

You are a child. Maybe that will make it clearer. You believe the lies then you sell the lies. That makes you useless. Can you tell me why that idiot Hunter Biden was on the board of a foreign government energy company? I know more about energy than Hunter Biden.

reply

[–] Karl Aksel (1498) 4 years ago

I have given you every opportunity to prove me wrong, and you have not only failed to do so, but you refuse to even try. That makes your accusations empty.

reply

[–] trevorh321 (5495) 4 years ago

I don't have to prove it. Biden ADMITS to doing it.

reply

[–] Karl Aksel (1498) 4 years ago

Yes, for the reasons *I* have given. Absolutely NOT for the reasons YOU have given.

reply

[–] trevorh321 (5495) 4 years ago

No. Biden did it because he wanted to protect his son, who was being paid a lot of money for something he was not qualified to do. Why do you suppose he was on the board with Burisma? He knows nothing about energy. Can you think of a reason why Burisma would do that?

reply

[–] Karl Aksel (1498) 4 years ago

No. Biden did it because he wanted to protect his son, who was being paid a lot of money for something he was not qualified to do.

No, that's Trump's lie. This is not what Biden admitted to. I asked you for evidence, all you're giving me is your best efforts at continually moving the goal posts.

Why do you suppose he was on the board with Burisma? He knows nothing about energy. Can you think of a reason why Burisma would do that?

This is perfectly common in the business world. Hunter was given a position on the board in order to gain experience. This happens all the time. Shall we talk about Trump's kids?

reply

[–] trevorh321 (5495) 4 years ago

Trump has nothing to do with that. It's about Biden and his son and why in the world would a foreign company pay his son so much money to do absolutely nothing? Can you think of a reason?

reply

[–] Karl Aksel (1498) 4 years ago

Trump has nothing to do with that.

Never even suggested that he did. I was accusing you of hypocrisy, you dolt.

It's about Biden and his son and why in the world would a foreign company pay his son so much money to do absolutely nothing?

"So much money"? He was paid a perfectly nominal fee. And as he was the son of the VP of the most powerful nation on earth, that's a lot of prestige for Burisma, so it's money well spent for them.

reply

[–] trevorh321 (5495) 4 years ago

Then why did you bring up Trump? He didn't hire Hunter. He didn't force Ukraine to get rid of one of their prosecutors or else hold back funds.
And you can't answer the question. Why would some foreign country hire Hunter Biden, a man with NO experience in energy and pay him so much money?
Can you think of a real reason?
No? That's why you are bankrupt.

reply

[–] NorrinRad (5470) 4 years ago

That was very well articulated by you. Well done sir. Well done.

reply

[–] cyguration (3951) 4 years ago

Burisma is a holding company for energy production, especially natural gas. Corruption in such a company is bound to have an impact on international prices, and so it is in pretty much everyone's interest that corruption is rooted out. Which is why the EU, the US, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund all pressured Ukraine to get rid of Viktor Shokin - it wasn't just the US or Biden who wanted him out.

All of that is a lie.

Biden inserted himself because his son, Hunter, was coming under investigation by the prosecutor that Joe later had removed. Hunter had allegedly corrupt dealings with Burisma while he was on the board:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/breaking-burisma-investigation-released-within-24-hours-finds-biden-family-guilty-criminal-actions-video/

Biden had the prosecutor looking into Hunter's corruption removed, and the new prosecutor conveniently found no evidence of corruption:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/04/ukranian-prosecutors-finds-no-evidence-against-hunter-biden

The FBI then ran interference to cover up any possible tax issues while also trying to bury the laptop story:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hunter-biden-ukraine-idUSKBN1WX1P7

You can see the contents of the laptop, including revelations about his corrupt dealings from the images/videos leaked, here:
https://www.tmbfiles.com/leaked-all-hunter-biden-photos-sex-tapes/

The Left have spun so many lies it's pretty disgusting how people are attempting to bury the truth with blatant disinformation.

reply

[–] Karl Aksel (1498) 4 years ago

All of that is a lie.

Not at all. And none of your links demonstrate otherwise, either.

Biden inserted himself because his son, Hunter, was coming under investigation by the prosecutor that Joe later had removed. Hunter had allegedly corrupt dealings with Burisma while he was on the board:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/breaking-burisma-investigation-released-within-24-hours-finds-biden-family-guilty-criminal-actions-video/

Gateway Pundit.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-gateway-pundit/

Biden had the prosecutor looking into Hunter's corruption removed, and the new prosecutor conveniently found no evidence of corruption:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/04/ukranian-prosecutors-finds-no-evidence-against-hunter-biden

No evidence of corruption against Hunter Biden, yes, because there was none to find. But that's not relevant to this discussion, is it? Viktor Shokin was never tasked with investigating Hunter Biden.

The FBI then ran interference to cover up any possible tax issues while also trying to bury the laptop story:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hunter-biden-ukraine-idUSKBN1WX1P7

Did you post the wrong link? There's nothing about the FBI or the ridiculous laptop story in that article.

You can see the contents of the laptop, including revelations about his corrupt dealings from the images/videos leaked, here:
https://www.tmbfiles.com/leaked-all-hunter-biden-photos-sex-tapes/

I have no doubt that there were "compromising files" on that laptop. Problem is, there is absolutely nothing linking that laptop to Hunter Biden. I find it nothing short of amazing that you can believe such obvious nonsense.

The Right have spun so many lies it's pretty disgusting how people are attempting to bury the truth with blatant disinformation.

Fixed that for you. You're peddling conspiracy theories, for heaven's sake.

reply

[–] cyguration (3951) 4 years ago

Problem is, there is absolutely nothing linking that laptop to Hunter Biden.

Look at the photos and watch the videos.

Good luck coming up with a lie to cover those up, ace.

reply

[–] Karl Aksel (1498) 4 years ago

Look at the photos and watch the videos.

What's that supposed to prove?

Good luck coming up with a lie to cover those up, ace.

So that device you are using to post your inane comments, does that belong to Hunter Biden, too? After all, the same files can be found there, as well.

reply

[–] cyguration (3951) 4 years ago

What's that supposed to prove?

He had sex with his niece when she was underage.

He did cocaine with Lady Gaga.

He had sex with underage Chinese kids.

He was going to cut his dad into a business deal with a Chinese mogul until the mogul came up missing.

You defending a pedophile is pretty low and disgusting.

reply

[–] millsey72 (10943) 4 years ago

Yes that is true. The Trump administration was duped by Russian disinformation.

reply

[–] Bloodshot77 (14248) 4 years ago

Nuh uh. My professor says otherwise.

reply

[–] millsey72 (10943) 4 years ago

Your professor is probably from a clown show

reply

[–] Bloodshot77 (14248) 4 years ago

He is the brother of yours.

reply

[–] asom (6894) 4 years ago

Even if the official was corrupt Biden had no business to withhold financing.
But the main problem is not even that, the main problem is that the official he was trying to remove was involved/investigating/whatever in a corruption case involving his son. THIS is the very essence of corruption. Sounds more like "you guys leave my son alone or you get no money".

Trump can say the exact thing: he was withholding financing to uncover acts of corruption as well ...

reply

[–] Karl Aksel (1498) 4 years ago

Even if the official was corrupt Biden had no business to withhold financing.

Why not? Biden was acting on behalf of the US government. Trump, on the other hand, threatened to cancel a transaction unless Zelensky aided Trump in his personal cloak and dagger shenanigans.

But the main problem is not even that, the main problem is that the official he was trying to remove was involved/investigating/whatever in a corruption case involving his son.

No, he wasn't. He was tasked with investigating corruption in Burisma, yes, but not Hunter specifically. And the problem was, Shokin wasn't investigating. See, Biden didn't simply tell Ukraine, "remove him". He said REPLACE him. Find someone who will do their goddamn job. Biden made no suggestion as to who the replacement should be, he simply told the Ukraine to find someone competent, and not corrupt. And again, this wasn't just Biden: most Western countries wanted the exact same thing. The only reason you guys are singling out Biden is because it's Biden, but he wasn't doing anything other countries weren't also doing.

THIS is the very essence of corruption. Sounds more like "you guys leave my son alone or you get no money".

No, it doesn't sound remotely like that at all - unless you believe Trump's spin on it, and I have no idea why you would think it's a good idea to do that.

Trump can say the exact thing: he was withholding financing to uncover acts of corruption as well ...

No he can't. His own agencies had already cleared Hunter Biden of any wrongdoings. It is unheard of to press the issue using foreign agencies in lieu of that.

reply

[–] asom (6894) 4 years ago

You see, that's how you interpret things because you support biden. I don't like either of them in almost equal measure.

reply

[–] cyguration (3951) 4 years ago

Don't bother with that guy. He's literally saying the laptop from hell wasn't Hunter's, even though I provided a link to the photos/images of Hunter engaged in illicit activity. Anyone who looks at the link can see it for themselves.

Also Hunter's correspondence reveals he was already in shady dealings with the Chinese and Ukrainians and Joe was involved.

The guy above is a delusional Leftist, ignoring clear and blatant evidence of corruption.

I was never a fan of Trump, but with all of the Big Tech/FBI-cover ups of Joe and his son, I'm even less of a fan of Beijing Biden.

reply

[–] Karl Aksel (1498) 4 years ago

Don't bother with that guy. He's literally saying the laptop from hell wasn't Hunter's, even though I provided a link to the photos/images of Hunter engaged in illicit activity.

No, you didn't. You provided a link to the material on the laptop, but no evidence linking the laptop to Hunter.

Also Hunter's correspondence reveals he was already in shady dealings with the Chinese and Ukrainians and Joe was involved.

Feel free to provide any actual evidence.

The guy above is a delusional Leftist, ignoring clear and blatant evidence of corruption.

I demolished your reply to me, with your links to the supposed "evidence". The links were either batshit crazy conspiracy sites, or respectable sites which, however, did not say what you claimed they said.

I was never a fan of Trump,

So why do you swallow everything he says hook, line and sinker?

but with all of the Big Tech/FBI-cover ups of Joe and his son, I'm even less of a fan of Beijing Biden.

"Bejing Biden". Bejing Trump, actually. Trump has paid far more in taxes to China than he has to the US. And when Trump implemented his so-called trade tarrifs on Chinese goods, he made specific exceptions for all items manufactured in China for himself and his daughter. And yet, it is Trump who has said that Biden is in the pocket of China, with extremely dodgy evidence, and you - gullible you - believe it without question. And you want us to believe that you're not a fan of Trump? Idiot.

reply

[–] cyguration (3951) 4 years ago

https://nypost.com/2021/04/02/hunter-bidens-full-of-it-he-knows-its-his-laptop-and-wasnt-hacked/

The FBI and reporters already confirmed thee-mails, dates, and time-stamps on the computer with the Delaware computer shop owner.

Personal photos and videos of Hunter involved in criminal activity don't just magically appear from a random laptop. Occam's Razor is in effect here.

But at this point you're equivocating with sophistry because you have no argument.

Feel free to provide any actual evidence.

It's in the link above you keep ignoring.

So why do you swallow everything he says hook, line and sinker?

I didn't, I don't, never have. I only follow the facts. And the facts clearly say you're wrong.

The links were either batshit crazy conspiracy sites, or respectable sites which, however, did not say what you claimed they said.

Calling facts conspiracy theories doesn't change the facts, it just means you're denying them. That's an issue you'll have to resolve yourself.

Also, the sites confirmed what the other links stated: The FBI investigated Hunter's taxes and found no wrongdoing, even though the evidence on the laptop shows he was involved with international trade deals that involved his father, who later had the prosecutor investigating his son removed, which is a blatant conflict of interest.

https://www.wnd.com/2019/09/ukrainian-prosecutor-fired-investigating-hunter/

There's no denying the facts. But feel free to keep lying and using sophistry to deny reality.

reply

[–] Karl Aksel (1498) 4 years ago

You see, that's how you interpret things because you support biden. I don't like either of them in almost equal measure.

Real cute. I don't support Biden. I'll defend Biden against ludicrous accusations, same as I would (and have) Bush and Trump. Just take a minute to analyse your own position, and if you have any critical sense at all you'll see it simply doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

reply

[–] asom (6894) 4 years ago

biden, democrats, same shit.

That's NOTHING ludicrous about those accusations.

reply

[–] MovieChatUser497 (18943) 4 years ago

He shouldn’t just be impeached he should be in jail alongside his scumbag VP

reply