MovieChat Forums > Edward Norton Discussion > What has destroyed the career of Edward ...

What has destroyed the career of Edward Norton as an actor?


https://www.quora.com/What-has-destroyed-the-career-of-Edward-Norton-as-an-actor/answer/Lloyd-Dean-Burgess-1

Edward Norton earned his 0.33 Oscar nomination at the 2015 Academy Awards for his performance in Birdman. The movie, and Norton's role, blur the traces among reality and fiction. Michael Keaton — a former Batman — plays an actor trying to get away the shadow of a string of superhero movies. Norton performs a selfish, pretentious actor no one wants to paintings with due to the fact he is so tough. At least Norton has a humorousness about his popularity — he is reportedly not the maximum easygoing guy on film units. That, and a number of these other elements, are why Norton does not show up in movies all that often anymore.

Marvel didn't like him when he got angry.

In 2008, Marvel Studios reacquired the rights to the Incredible Hulk from Universal, following the poorly reviewed 2003 Hulk. Marvel opted to reboot the franchise as The Incredible Hulk and hired Zak Penn (who'd co-written more than one X-Men films) to write the screenplay. The studio approached Norton to megastar, and after assembly with director Louis Leterrier, he signed on, provided any recommendations he made to Penn's screenplay be included into the script.

Norton obviously did a vast rewrite of the movie simply weeks before filming commenced, and Leterrier shot as a good deal of Norton's script as possible, at the side of Penn's, which resulted in a completely messy, convoluted reduce. Marvel executives hated the edit and ordered a new one, with more motion and much less speak and individual development—the latter have been in large part Norton's consciousness. Marvel so resented Norton's meddling that when it got here time to deliver the Hulk back to the big display screen as a part of The Avengers, the role become given to Mark Ruffalo. Studios nearly in no way touch upon why an actor is or isn't always cast, but Marvel took the uncommon step of issuing a announcement pronouncing they desired "an actor who embodies the creative and collaborative spirit of our different talented forged contributors." In brief: they had been sick of him and did not want to deal with his shenanigans again.

He said he's not really into doing sequels.

In a on account that-deleted 2010 Facebook put up (via The Hollywood Reporter), Norton addressed Marvel's choice to re-forged the Hulk in The Avengers. "I truely hoped it may take place and be outstanding for each person," he wrote in part, "however it hasn't turned out as we all hoped."

Four years later, Norton appreciably changed his track. "I without a doubt, simply loved it," Norton said of The Incredible Hulk, including, "And yet, I looked at the stability of time in life that one spends no longer only making the ones varieties of films but then mainly setting them out, and the responsibilities that rightly include that… I think you can kind of do something as soon as, but if you do it too many times, it may end up a fit it truly is hard to take off, in different peoples' eyes." It's proper — simply study how becoming Iron Man just simply destroyed Robert Downey Jr.'s career, proper?

He tried to pull rank on the set of Red Dragon.

During the filming of the 2002 Silence of the Lambs prequel Red Dragon, Norton showed up on set to movie his scenes as FBI profiler Will Graham. He became reputedly a bit bit over-prepared, because in his palms were brand-new (and absolutely unsolicited) script pages that Norton had taken it upon himself to jot down. He additionally demanded that director Brett Ratner shoot them. Neither Ratner nor the film's manufacturers took kindly to Norton's spontaneous and unwarranted script doctoring (to a screenplay via Academy Award-winner Ted Tally), and lots expert arguing ensued. You can't blame Ratner or Red Dragon's producers, although — film scenes should be cautiously planned out, budgeted, and storyboarded earlier than filming … no longer to mention how actors want to examine their lines and explore their characters in advance, as well as the fundamental chain of command that makes a film set run easily. Norton disrespected all of that, so you can see why all people else turned into indignant with him.

reply

The guy is reportedly a monumental pain to work with.

And he comes from serious money, so he doesn't feel the need to stop being a monumental pain so he can get hired.

That may be all there is to his career decline.

reply

He comes off that way. He pretty much plays the same guy in most movies. He's not bad, but I find him off-putting. So he's either really a good actor or he is just that way in RL

reply

Well, somebody's got to play the off-putting guy, and Norton can do is really well!

Now if only he could do so without being a diva who (allegedly) gives notes to other actors and tries to take control of projects away from his directors, he might get hired to do it more often.

reply

He's talented, but not Brando talented where people are willing to put up with any amount of aggravation to work with him.

reply

Even Brando got fewer and fewer offers, as he got to be more of a pain in the ass to hire, and produced less in the way of box-office returns.

And he was Brando, a fucking LEGEND, not a good character actor who's allegedly more trouble than he's worth.

reply

True. I think Brando also would pretty must stop acting for long stretches of time, just because he didn't like acting and didn't need to. He'd end up going back to it when he'd squandered his money.

reply

I don't know how much of Brando's later career decline was his own idea, and how much was other people not wanting to work with him.

reply

Not being jewish never helps in Hollywood.

reply

https://www.quora.com/Why-did-Harrison-Ford-become-such-a-movie-superstar-post-Star-Wars-despite-limited-acting-range-while-co-stars-Hamill-and-Fisher-simply-faded-away/answer/Robert-Parker-726

Ben Affleck is not now, and never was, a good actor. Edward Norton Jr. is an absolutely phenomenal actor. And while Norton has had a very rewarding film career and had turned in some great recent performances in movies like Birdman or Isle of Dogs, he rarely gets lead roles and when he does, he is rarely tapped by directors or producers for multiple films - for instance, he has the dubious distinction of being one of the only two primary actors to lose a role in the MCU.

But Edward Norton Jr. is not easy to work with. He overrules directorial and writing decisions and decides what he wants the movie to be, even if he is just hired to be an actor. He is notoriously self-serving, doesn’t help market his movies, and will trash talk his own bosses.

Ben Affleck, on the other hand, has a reputation for being immensely respectful and cooperative on set. Even with two academy awards for screenplay and production, his first objective on the set is to respect the director and writers’ visions for the project. When he has to ask for days off, instead of just telling the studio they have to deal with it, he will be apologetic and even send the director flowers as a thank you. He hangs out with the extras and crew and makes friends with everyone on set.

reply

No adult male should need to send another adult male flowers as an "apology" for needing days off. When I need to take days off from work I don't send my boss flowers, I just explain why I need days off. In the real world we call that "playing politics" or brown-nosing. You don't think that kissing major is self serving?

Anyone who is authentic should trash talk his own bosses because bosses are often wrong. Blindly following instructions is never the sign of a great mind

You copied and pasted a post from Quora (not a good source at all, but ok), without comment, so I assume you agree with the quote. Ben Affleck has remained on the A-list despite having sexually harassed women like his brother. I'm not trying to shit on Ben Affleck, he can live his life however he wants, but it's a weird thing to compare him and Edward Norton when they don't really have much in common and it paints a narrative that is overly generous to one guy and overly harsh to the other

reply

He's a really good actor, and I've always liked him and wished he was in more projects. But yeah, apparently he's an absolute nightmare to work with.

Tony Kaye, director of 'American History X' has basically disowned that film, and tried to scrub away any involvement he had with it, because Norton forced him to make so many changes to the story and script that it really wasn't even his project anymore. In fact, if I remember correctly, I think Kaye walked off the project, and then Norton edited the whole thing himself, and tacked on a whole new ending.

reply

The 25th Hour and that stupid movie with DeNiro was enough for me to realize he was a one trick pony.

reply

You didn't like The Score? I thought it was pretty good. Watched it while doing chores one night.

reply

Honestly it was a huge disappointment. I was practically delirious to see a movie with both Deniro and Norton as I, like everybody else, was thinking Norton could be the next superstar actor. I just didn't buy into the plot, I especially didn't buy the mentally challenged janitor bit, although it takes a good amount of acting to pull that off. Early 2000's movies were tough going for me, then they got better for a few years, then fell completely off the cliff.

reply

I understand all of your points completely. The mentally challenged janitor bit was kind of hokey.

reply

Yeah, I felt early 2000s films were pretty rough going for me as well; many times I tried to seek out something I wanted to see in a theater, and eventually gave up (viewed "Under the Tuscan Sun" in 2003 & "Uncut Gems" last year, and that's been about it for me on that front).

reply

I love it too. One of the last great DeNiro flicks, IMO.

reply

Did you see that last movie he did? Motherless Brooklyn? OMG what a piece of shit. He plays an autistic detective LOL. I'm not kidding.

He has had his good performances but nothing award worthy IMO. No need to suffer the petulant behavior of a genuine asshole.

He is not a draw for me. Maybe that is a common enough opinion to sit him where he is naturally.

reply

Well, he was a shill for Obama so he can't be that bright.

reply

Primal Fear, Larry Flint, American Story X, Fight Club, this guy did have a really brilliant start but his own ego ruined everything for him.

He overruled the director on American Story X and work perfectly for him to the point maybe that movie is the classic it is thanks to Norton's decisions. but obviously, that converts him into an arrogant prick, who pretends to pull the same trick over and over again.

And most probably his "suggestions" weren't very good anyway because at the time of directing his own movies the results weren't nothing special.

reply