This has been the argument for decades, but it really doesn’t hole up to scrutiny anymore. It’s true that in the first seven years of her film career, three of her films went on to win the Academy Award for Best Picture, (The Deer Hunter, Kramer vs. Kramer & Out of Africa), however in the subsequent thirty-five years and fifteen Oscar nods, only one of her films achieved as much as a nomination for Best Picture, (The Hours), and as with majority of her films since 1985, Meryl’s performance garnered the only Oscar nomination the films received.
Point being, Meryl doesn’t really have the luxury of picking the great roles, but rather manages to get good roles in mediocre films and elevates the material.
Also, when people say the Oscars are meaningless, the fact is this translates to they don’t agree with the Academy’s choices, (that's fine, I don't always either), but in truth, there’s no one whose star is so big that they’re not clamoring for a front row seat when they’re nominated, including the richest man on the planet, (Jeffrey Bezos), when an Amazon production was nominated for Best Picture.
reply
share