Best Action Star of the 21st Century
Belongs in the same sentence as Arnold Schwarzenegger, Sly Stallone,Bruce Willis and Bruce Lee
shareBelongs in the same sentence as Arnold Schwarzenegger, Sly Stallone,Bruce Willis and Bruce Lee
shareTom Cruise is the best actor of my generation, maybe the best action star of this century, but I would be open to arguments against it. Those other guys dominated the 20th Century, when Tom was getting his acting chops in order doing blockbuster drama like Born On The 4th Of July and A Few Good Men. Those other actors you listed could never in a million years achieve the quality of acting that Tom brings to the table. In that way he's on an entirely different tier the muscle bound heroes could never dream of.
shareHe is the obvious choice the quality and breadth of his movies are unequaled in the history of Hollyweird.
He's the GOAT.
AS FAR AS ACTION...I CANT ARGUE THAT...AS FAR AS ACTING...HE HAS BEEN PLAYING HIMSELF IN EVERY MOVIE FOR A WHILE NOW...🙂
shareThat's true, but he's *capable* of a lot more. I'd cite Magnolia, Interview with the Vampire, Collateral, Born on the Fourth of July, A Few Good Men, The Last Samurai, Rain Man, and Tropic Thunder. Even stuff like Risky Business proves his acting capabilities. His breadth goes from hard-hitting dramas to fun comedy. Even when he's "just" the leading man, it's hard to think of one where he's doing a bad job. Minority Report, Mission: Impossible, and Oblivion don't hurt for his performance.
He's an underrated actor who people dismiss as being "just Tom Cruise", but he's really great, and he's not afraid to go dark (Collateral), gross (Magnolia), or both (Tropic Thunder!) for roles.
I do agree with you insofar as he hasn't been stretching his talents for awhile now, but he's a great actor.
"the quality and breadth of his movies are unequaled in the history of Hollyweird"
From somebody who has apparently not seen any movies from before 1990.
[deleted]
The 21st century has a lot more years to go until it’s completed.
shareHe's the new Jackie Chan whereas Keanu Reeves is the new Jet Li.
shareHe's the new Burt Reynolds.
shareTC is one of the last of the true Hollywood movie stars. A dying breed. Plus, he not only picks his films very wisely, he also gives 110% effort every single time. This guy has done over 50 films...and I can’t think of 3 stinkers. Like him or hate him, dude is pretty effin impressive.
shareLimited range: check
Does his own stunts: check
Peter Pan syndrome: check
there's a still a lot in common with Burt
(to be clear, I've always been a fan of Burt Reynolds)
I liked Burt Reynolds a lot, but I don't see any similarities at all with Tom Cruise. For starters, Burt made mostly dumb, simple, good-times movies....and he was generally either a good ol' boy or a cop 90% of the time. He stretched himself a bit more in his third act, which I liked. I generally look back on Burt and his films with fondness...not so much for the quality, but more for nostalgia. I was a kid when he was that huge, fun Hollywood star in the late 70's thru early 80's.
But again, I see zero similarities...unless you were kidding and I missed it. Tom Cruise has quite a bit more range, for starters. For example...The Color of Money....Born on the 4th of July....Rain Man....The Firm....A Few Good Men....Interview w/ a Vampire.....Mission Impossible....Jerry MaGuire....Eyes Wide Shut.....Magnolia....Vanilla Sky.....Collateral.....The Last Samurai.........etc, etc. Simply an amazing body of work. When people hear the name Tom Cruise, they typically think of action movies (which is pretty dismissive of his other genres)....but I get it. They do this because his action movies in the past 25 years have been amazing...one after another.
But if you ever want to get a reminder of TC's acting chops, check out a movie like Born on the 4th of July. He's incredible in that movie...and he will break your heart. I'll put that performance up against ANYTHING Burt Reynolds ever did....and it wouldn't be CLOSE.
Again, nothing against Burt....but I'd guess even he would have admitted....he was just churning out mindless, C-level films for most of his career, simply trading on his star power. He was more of a movie star than an actor, though he did have his moments.
As far as stunts....again, not even close. Burt did what....drove a TransAm in car chases? Tom Cruise ran down the side of a sky.....scraper!
Regarding Peter Pan Syndrome....Burt typically looked older than his age. When he hit mid-thirties, he kept the same look (of a guy in his 40's) for a decent amount of time (due mostly to mustache and cowboy hats). That look is pretty low maintenance. But he never really had a youthful appearance. TC has aged incredibly well...and still (at nearly 60) does stunts himself that guys half his age would pass on.
I only disagree with you based on one issue I have, and that is he doesn't bring the fun the others do. All four actors you mentioned could do no action scenes and still be fun to watch, whereas I don't really get that vibe from anything Tom Cruise has done recently.
share