MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Is filmflaneur a Skavau sock?

Is filmflaneur a Skavau sock?


Let’s look at the evidence, and feel free to add your own observations.

1. Skavau runs away from the entire site in humiliation immediately after Trump’s victory (his 2 years of gaslighting utterly failed and backfired) and coinciding with this Flimflam emerges as a 24/7 incessant poster doing a practically identical routine - trolling and interrogating anyone who resists the regime and its bullshit narratives.

2. Both posters have a pathological need to reply, ending up with vertical threads like this: https://moviechat.org/bd0000082/Politics/672d632b8e07205b37128f6e/Skavaus-epic-gaslighting-mission-FAILED?reply=6733860f4ace9453ab479a1f

3. Both are low IQ yet smug pseudo intellectual Brits who deal in bad and transparent sophistry.

4. Both feel like ‘bots’ - they lack humanity, invention, humour, and have robotic, repetitive speech patterns that feel… mechanical.

5. If Skavau is being ridiculed, Flimflam will often appear to try and defend him and take the heat off.

6. Both demand answers to a barrage of questions, pretending to be curious Socratic inquisitors, yet hypocritically run away from and evade questions they find challenging.


I’ll add more as we go. Of course, it’s possible that they’re simply both regime cultists and that will naturally attract similar personality types, but the similarities here are more striking than usual.

What do you think? Is Flimflam Skavau’s sock, or does Skavau just wear him like one when they’re alone? 🤔

reply

I'M NOT SKAVAU....BUT I HAVE TO ASK....HOW IS THIS MOUTHY MISCREANT STILL UNBANNED?


HE DOESN'T GENUINELY DISCUSS ANYTHING...HE ONLY FLAMES AND NAME CALLS AND THROWS TANTRUMS.....HE ADDS NOTHING OF VALUE....HE ONLY DETRACTS.



NOTHING AGAINST YOU MELTON....I HAVE TRYED TO SPEAK TO YOU....YOU'RE JUST A LOST CAUSE I GUESS.🤷🏾

reply

Kowalksi once again reveals himself to be another Leftist censor who cannot wait to wield the ban-hammer against wrongthinkers.

Not the first time the mask has slipped, you authoritarian little shit.

reply

Kowalski could have been a member of the right hand shuffle video club (AKA the podcast)

reply

IT'S NOT PERSONAL....IT'S JUST YOU...YOU'RE THE WORST.

reply

There could be no greater compliment than to be despised by a creature like you.

reply

I DO NOT DESPISE YOU,BUDDY.....IF ANYTHING...I PITY YOU....YOU ARE MISSING OUT ON SOME GREAT CONVERSATIONS AND MAYBE EVEN A FRIEND OR TWO WITH THIS TWISTED LITTLE SHTICK OF YOURS.

reply

Yeah bullshit ‘YOU’RE THE WORST’. The mask has slipped, creepo, frantically trying to shove it back on isn’t working.

reply

NO...NO SHOVING BACK....OR FORWARD....YOU ARE THE WORST....YOUR MC RESUME SAYS NOTHING GOOD.....BUT I DON'T DESPISE YOU....YOU'RE JUST THE WORST....MAYBE YOU CAN GET BETTER?🤔

reply

The faux-friendly shtick just comes across as even more creepy alongside ‘YOU’RE THE WORST’ and you frantically trying to get me banned.

Last time the mods saw straight through your routine and told you to fuck off 🤣 remember?

reply

WHAT I REMEMBER IS HOW YOU WERE BANGING AWAY AT THIS EDGELORD BADASS PERSONA THEN...AND YOU STILL ARE....DUDE...YOU REALLY NEED TO MOVE ON.

reply

Oops, your mask slipped again…

reply

WHAT MASK?

reply

The one we’ve been discussing in this thread, dildo 🤦🏻‍♂️

https://moviechat.org/general/General-Discussion/67392900b3e05c49a2f766a8/Is-filmflaneur-a-Skavau-sock?reply=67392d67b3e05c49a2f766ce

reply

NO...WE HAVE NOT...YOU HAVE...DISCUSSING SHIT WITH YOURSELF....FAIRLY NORMAL BEHAVIOUR FOR YOU.

reply

No, dildo, your creepy mask of faux-friendliness is the topic of this sub-thread. If you were capable of reading instead of narcissistically screaming about yourself in all-caps on a constant loop then you wouldn’t make such a prick of yourself. Try it.


reply

FALSE...NOTHING FAUX ABOUT ANYTHING I HAVE SAID....I WOULDHAPPILY BE YOUR PAL AND CHAT FLICKS WITH YOU.

reply

How come you keep flaunting Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?

reply

YOU SEEM TO THINK YOU FOUND A BONE...BUT YOU HAVEN'T....THAT ISN;T HOW THE RULE IS APPLIED AND EVENIF IT WAS THE MODS HAVE GRACIOUSLY ALLOWED ME MY GIMMICK....IT IS WHAT IT IS....WE SHOULD MOVE PAST THIS....I WOULD GENUINELY LIKE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR OPINIONS ON FILMS

reply

YOU FOUDN ABONE

What? 🤣 Better edit that quick, fingers shaking?

Let’s try again. How come you keep flaunting Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?

reply


WHY DO YOU FLAUNT RULES #3 & #4 OF THE SITE'S STANDARDS?


Content that harasses, intimidates or bullies an individual or group of individuals
Content that incites hatred against, promotes discrimination of, or disparages an individual or group on the basis of their race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, age, nationality, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, or other characteristic that is associated with systemic discrimination or marginalization


reply

You dodged the question again. How come you keep flaunting Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?

reply

I'M NOT...THE MODS ARE COOL WITH ME....NOW ANSWER MY QUESTION PAL.

reply

You dodged it again. How come you keep flaunting Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?

reply

I'M NOT BUDDY...THE RULE DOESN'T APPLY AND THE MDS ARE COOL WITH ME....


WANNA TRY MY QUESTION?...OR MAYBE CHAT FLICKS?

reply

You very clearly are, and you dodged the question again. How come you keep flaunting Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?

reply

IF IT HAS BEEN ALLOWED AND OKAYED IT ISN;T FLAUNTING......YOU NEED TO LISTEN BETTER,PAL. 😘

reply

It’s not allowed, that’s why it’s a rule. Once again, how come you keep flaunting Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?

reply

BUT...IT'S N0T....LEARN TO READ...ALSO...FLAMING IS A RULE...YET YOU CONTINUE TO NAME CALL...SO?

reply

It is a rule, it’s right there in the Terms & Conditions.

Once again, how come you keep flaunting Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?

reply

YOU ARE READING IT INCORRECTLY.


REPEATEDLY.😘

reply

No, it’s very clear, excessive use of capital letters is prohibited.

So once again, how come you keep flaunting Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?

reply

ROUND AND ROUND WE GO....HE REPEATS HIMSELF AND I DON'T CARE...THE LOVE AFFAIR THAT MOVIECHAT DOESN'T WANT.

reply

We’re not going around, we’re going in a straight line, you’re just dodging the question.

Let’s try again. How come you keep flaunting Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?

reply

I AM NOT...FROM POST NUMBER ONE I HAVE BEEN WHO I AM AND THE SITE HAS WELCOMED ME...NO FLAUNTING...JUST BUSINES AS USUAL...NOW....ABOUT YOUR ISSUES WITH BREAKING THE RULES.

reply

No. You breach Rule 18 every single time you post.

Let’s go again. How come you keep flaunting Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?

reply

YOU HAVE MY ANSWER...REPEATEDLY...NOT THAT I NEED TO HAVE GIVEN YOU ONE....YOU ARE AN IRRITATING PERSON...YOU KNOWTHAT?.....TRY TO BE FRIENDLIER.

reply

No. You haven’t answered it, you keep dodging.

Let’s try again. How come you keep flaunting Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?

reply

KOWALSKI is a reasonable person. He is regarded highly here. He might intimidate some posters but I assure you he means no harm.

We can all get along on MC if we behave Melton✌️

reply

Demonstrably wrong, that nasty little fucker is actively trying to get me banned… again.

He might present as a jovial troll, but his true nature is another fetid narcissistic Little Hitler Leftist like Skavau whose primary goal is to get wrongthinkers censored and banned.

He also sprays his obnoxious all-caps diarrhoea all over the site, spoiling countless movie discussion threads so that he can scream about himself some more.

And that’s before we even discuss his constant predatory homosexual activities - using this site as his own personal Grinder, trying to pick up straight men.

Be careful what kind of men you choose to defend.

reply

I'm not attacking or defending anyone Melton, I'm just presenting honest testimony about a poster that I've grown to love and appreciate a great deal over the last several years.

KOWALSKI may not be your cup of java but he is my good buddy. We should all aim to be buddies Melton.

reply

No, ‘we should all aim’ to tell the truth, support the good, and call out evil (like Kowalski)

It should disturb you that you’re ‘buddies’ with a predatory homosexual and censorious Little Hitler like Kowalski.

Get better friends.


Hey Kowalski, come in here and give a special message to ShogunofYonkers…

reply

I ASKED YOUR FRIENDS...AND THEY SAID YOU DON'T HAVE ANY FRIENDS.

reply

STOP BEING THE WORST "PERSON" HERE.....THEN MYSELF AND MAYBE EVEN OTHERS WOULD LIKE YOU....UNTIL THEN....ENJOY YOUR LUNCHABLE,BUDDY.

reply

You're evil scum and I’d be insulted if a creature such as yourself were to like me.

reply

AWW...YOU'RE BEING KIND OF MEAN,BUDDY....IF I DIDN'T KNOW BETTER I WOULD THINK YOU DIDN'T LIKE ME.....TRY USING YOUR FRIENDLY WORDS.

reply

Eat shit you nasty censorious authoritarian bitch.

In addition to your aggressive predatory homosexual flirtation, there are increasing rumours that you’re into underage boys. If that’s true, respond to this post with a ‘😘’ emoji. Go…

reply

😘

reply

That seems pretty harsh Melton.
We get together here to talk movies, music, TV and sometimes literature.

Just chill out, it's a nice site.

reply

It may or may not be harsh, but it’s certainly fair.

You also ‘get together here’ to force regime political narratives on people and censor wrongthinkers.

reply

I don’t force anyone to do anything lol!
It seems you don’t know me at all Pal😄

reply

Don’t try to hide it Shogun. You’ve been exhibiting that sort of behavior around here for years. :)

reply

I never boss anyone around…NOW DROP AND GIVE ME TWENTY😡!

reply

R Lee Ermey in the house!

reply

That’s what I was going for but I skipped all of the profanity😁

reply

I know that you’re providing cover for that evil censorious shitstain and predatory homosexual Kowalski. Do better.

It seems this reply flew over your head. Re-read it: https://moviechat.org/general/General-Discussion/67392900b3e05c49a2f766a8/Is-filmflaneur-a-Skavau-sock?reply=67396650b3e05c49a2f76997

reply

YOU POST ANGRY BULLSHIT AND NAME CALLING NASTINESS ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY.....YOU DESERVE A BAN....BUT I AM NOT IN CHARGE OF BANS NOR ANGLING FOR YOU TO GET ONE.....SIMPLY POINTING OUT HOW FUCKING STUPID YOU SOUND ON A POST BY POST BASIS.😘

reply

YOU DESERVE A BAN

Do you deserve a ban for relentlessly breaching Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?

reply

I FORGIVE YOU.🫂

reply

Let’s try again. Do you deserve a ban for relentlessly breaching Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?

reply

WHY DO YOU FLAUNT RULES #3 & #4 OF THE SITE'S STANDARDS?


Content that harasses, intimidates or bullies an individual or group of individuals
Content that incites hatred against, promotes discrimination of, or disparages an individual or group on the basis of their race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, age, nationality, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, or other characteristic that is associated with systemic discrimination or marginalization

reply

You dodged the question. Do you deserve a ban for relentlessly breaching Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?

reply

AWW MELTON...YOU KNOW I DIDN'T DODGE THE QUESTION...THE RULE DOES NOT APPLY AND THE MODS ARE OK WITH IT......LET'S TALK ABOUT SOMETHING ELSE,BUDDY.

reply

You dodged it again. Do you deserve a ban for relentlessly breaching Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?

reply

THIS IS ALMOST FUN...ALMOST....NOT DODGING...YOU THE RULE DOES NOT APPLY...AND IF IT DOES...THE MODS ARE COOL WITH MY CAPS...SO NO WORRIES.

reply

You dodged the question again.

YOU DESERVE A BAN

Do you deserve a ban for relentlessly breaching Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?

reply

I DO NOT....EASY PEASY.

reply

Finally. You were really keen to dodge that one.

I DO NOT

You’ve breached the rule in the Terms & Conditions over 75,000 times so… why not?

reply

I HAVE NOT....YOU ARE A LITTLE DENSE.

reply

Yes you have, Rule 18 prohibits the excessive use of capital letters, and your 75,000+ posts all breach that rule, you fucking liar.

reply

TECHNICALLY YOU REPEATING THIS SO MANY TIMES IS SPAMMING....THAT IS PROHIBITED....YOUR BULLYING IS AGAINST THE RULES TO....AND FLAMING...TROLLING...ETC ETC ETC



NICE DEFLECTION FROM YOUR OWN TRANSGRESSIONS...BUT NOBODY IS BUYING IT BUDDY.

IN FACT I AM ONLY RESPONDING TO INFLATE THAT POST COUNT...CHASING SHOGUN FOR TOP SLOT.😉😉

reply

Well that desperate flurry of evasion didn’t work.

You frantically nag the mods to try and get other users banned based on site rules while flaunting Rule 18 75,000+ times and counting, expecting to get a free pass.

Fucking disgusting.

reply

I MADE ONE POST ABOUT YOU BEING A NEGATIVE TO THE SITE BASED ON YOUR POSTS....I WOULD HAVRDLY CALL THAT FRANTICALLY NAGGING....YOU THROW HYPERBOLE AND OUTRIGHT LIES AROUND WILLY NILLY.

reply

Bullshit, you’ve tried to get me censored and banned several times and god knows how many other users you’ve tried to ban while flaunting Rule 18 75,000+ times and counting, expecting the mods to give you a free pass.

Hypocritical, entitled prick.

Now, let’s address these rumours floating around about your sexual predations extending to minors. If they’re true, reply to this post with the following text:

FALSE...INSANE HYPERBOLE ON YOUR PART...YOU HAVE INFLATED THIS WHOLE MATTER TO INSANE PROPORTIONS....AND REPEATED YOURSELF INTO THE GROUND....FEEL BETTER?....PERHAPS WE CAN MOVE ON?...TALK ABOUT MOVIES OR SOMETHING?

Go…

reply

FALSE...INSANE HYPERBOLE ON YOUR PART...YOU HAVE INFLATED THIS WHOLE MATTER TO INSANE PROPORTIONS....AND REPEATED YOURSELF INTO THE GROUND....FEEL BETTER?....PERHAPS WE CAN MOVE ON?...TALK ABOUT MOVIES OR SOMETHING?

reply

How.many of your posts are actually about movies or TV shows?

Signed, million man.

reply

See for yourself.

reply

I'm not seeing much movie talk. Just waah waah so woke.

Signed, million man.

reply

Dumb bitch. With contemporary film Woke is the dominating issue - a cult that poisons virtually everything Hollywood shits out, so obviously it gets the appropriate attention.

(Much to the fury of committed ball-less wokists like yourself 🤣)

reply

WOKE IS A PHONY BUZZWORD FOR WHINY BITCHES.

reply

That is Skavau-level gaslighting. Do better, woke bitch.

In addition to your aggressive predatory homosexual flirtation, there are increasing rumours that you’re into underage boys. If that’s true, respond to this post with:

😂 ROUND AND ROUND.

Go…

reply

😂 ROUND AND ROUND.

reply

So, I'm right. Thank you.

Signed, million man.

reply

No, you’re confused, obnoxious and wrong.

Telling yourself you’re ‘right’ just makes you look like a prick.



reply

Let's look it, I think Skavau was way too invested in moviechat and his crusade for "justice" to simply walk away. he was able to respond within seconds and care enough to report people. so for him to simply walk away doesnt make sense.

But he was embarrassed and hurt when President Trump won and theres the accusations that he and various others here engaged in videochat masterbation sessions.. so i think he already had the filmflaneur sock a few months back, knowing this time would come. he's simply stopped using the Skavau sock.

Other evidence? the deflection technique where instead of staying on topic, he'll go off on some rant about something else as to "win", the pretenciousness of using phrases like "ad-homimen" thiniking it's clever. demand you answer his questions...

And yep, Filmflany only seems to be active on posts which concern skavau (expect him here within minutes)

Case closed.

Edit: wait, they're both brits!?!? i didn't know that! come on...it's too obvious!

reply

Ignore is a great function. You should consider using it instead of blasting people you don't like.

reply

I would agree with you, but I have you on Ignore.

reply

I'm sorry I didn't catch that....I have YOU on ignore.

reply

That’s nothing, I have everyone on ignore.

reply

LALALALALA I can’t hear you🤓!!!

reply

Pardon?

reply

No. You can’t call out evil if you ignore it 🤷🏻‍♂️

And ‘liking people’ is irrelevant to the purpose of this thread.

Read the OP carefully before trying to contribute.

reply

Personally, since filmflaneur doesn’t post in GD and Skavau rarely posts here, I’m a little meh about it all.

I bet if you copy and pasted this topic in Politics, it would gain more traction.

reply

Ignored AND reported for having an opinion😤

reply

It’s had plenty of ‘traction’ and this is not a political discussion 🤷🏻‍♂️

reply

It was merely a suggestion, since filmflaneur doesn’t post in GD and Skavau rarely posts here. You could always post it in Politics too and double the exposure.

reply

LMAO...HAVE YOU MADE A SINGLE GENUINE POST?....EVERY SINGLE THING YOU POST IS RUDE OR POLITICAL OR FOOLISH....MOSTLY RUDE.....ANYDY IS BEING WAY TO DIPLOMATIC AND POLITE...YOU DO NOT DESERVE IT.🙂

reply

It’s glorious to see you still sulking over Trump’s victory and your fellow butt-Sister Skavau abandoning you 🍻

reply

You shouldn't be bringing up Politics in the General Discussion Forum because that will get you banned and you've been warned about it too

reply

Err, hold on. The thread topic is not political, yet Kowalski is spamming the thread because he’s rage dumping over Trump’s victory (and the abandonment of his butt-boss). I’m simply calling what I see.

reply

Definitely a troll account, despite having film in their name all of their posts are either on the politics or religion boards. Could be a sock of someone that doesn’t want to discuss those topics from their main account.

The account is also only 3 months old, as has done most of its posting after the election.

reply

Some comments –replies written by filmflaneur stink of Skavauness:
And you didn't answer my question either.
Evasion noted.
Evasion still noted.
Still no links provided.

However, skavau would ask more questions (sometimes his replies were just a series of questions), be very supportive of the lgbt community, and demand provision of evidence "provide evidence that". Also, if you check out filmflaneur's first posts, someone writes "I remember you from the IMDB board. You the same guy?" and filmflaneur replies "Indeed I am. But I don't like it much here, it is too quiet and one has to wait minutes before making a second post." He also complained that the politics board is right-wing.
It is more probable that they are both regime cultists from the UK and that this filmflaneur is present now after Trump's win looking for debates with right-wingers.

reply

HEY...BUTTHOLE....QUIT IMPORTING POLITICS TO GENDIS.

reply

This is not a political thread!

reply

NO...IT'S A CALL OUT THREAD...WHICH IS FLAMING...AGAINST THE RULES ALL BY IT'S SELF....BUT IGNORANT WEINERS LIKE YOURSELF ARE DROPPING POLITICS HERE...ALSO AGAINST THE RULES.....BE A BETTER PERSON.

reply

?? I'm not discussing anything political, how can I be dropping politics? There's a reason Melton posted it here on the General forum. It has nothing to do with politics. Chill out.

reply

Kowalski’s mask is slipping, he’s revealing his true personality.

For more details see this post: https://moviechat.org/general/General-Discussion/67392900b3e05c49a2f766a8/Is-filmflaneur-a-Skavau-sock?reply=67396650b3e05c49a2f76997

reply

If there's a mouthy miscreant on this forum, that would be skavau, who enjoys bad-mouthing his opponents again and again when he has no arguments left to expose. I remember single (even short) replies of his with several curses, such as "fucktard", shitface etc. Where was Kowalski then? As a highly (the most?) regular poster he certainly knew very well what kind of lowlife skavau is. But I guess he's tolerant towards skavau's antics and vulgarity because both are lgbt-friendly, if not lgbt members. He called me out of the blue a butthole (I had no previous clash with him), supposedly because my post was political, against the rules (which ones?) and out of place on this General forum, and yet I think the reason he dislikes me is because I'm not lgbt-friendly.

reply

yet I think the reason he dislikes me is because I'm not lgbt-friendly.





THAT IS MORE THAN ENOUGH.😘

reply

I like some homosexual singers though and Clive Barker, a gay writer. So, okay, some gay people can be cool.

reply

The Clive Barker Books Of Blood anthologies contained some really good stories. He’s quite a great horror writer, up there with king and Ketchum.

reply

Yeah, the Books of Blood is a masterpiece collection of short stories and some of them have been adapted to the big screen: Lord of Illusions, Midnight Meat Train, Candyman, Book of Blood etc. And since you liked it, I recommend the 5 stylish comic books Tapping The Vein, based on 10 stories of the Books of Blood.

reply

Agreed. And thanks for the heads up on his comics, I was unaware of them and will look them up👍

reply

He also complained that the politics board is right-wing.
It is more probable that they are both regime cultists from the UK and that this filmflaneur is present now after Trump's win looking for debates with right-wingers.



POL I TICS !

reply

The sentences may be political, but my comment as a whole concerns the question of whether filmflaneur is skavau or not.

reply

NO POLITICS...AT ALL...THEMS POLITICS,BUDDY.

reply

Kowalski has assigned himself queen of the thought police 👆🏻

reply

Kowalski is one of these sad people that you usually see on boards like this, they go all the way back to the IMDB days, they turn people here into their "family" and create little inside jokes for themselves to cream over. bloodshot is another one.

someone like kowalski doesn't want a thread like this here, a valid thread, he wants only his little pointless threads where he tells you what he had for breakfast, while all the other simpletons reply with emojis and say what a good guy he is.

reply

I think you're singling out Kowalski too much here, but it is nice to see some counterpoint opinions when the usual trend is for the GD people to badmouth the politics crowd.

reply

I'm singling him out because i see someone who is doing something i've seen on the internet for years, someone like kowalski has been here for a long time, and so he thinks that this whole website is his, he's made people here into his family, surely because he doesn't have a real one, it's this old cringeworthy thing where people purposely create inside jokes, defend each other in this "ooohh i've got butterflies in my stomach!" kind of way..

this little board circlejerk of about 5 or 6 users here which is so tragic.

i've singled kowalski out, because kowalski couldn't bare the fact that melton had the nerve to actually create a thread that kowalski didn't approve of.

kowalski could have ignored it, gone on about his little "i like this song, how cool am i" threads.. but no, he had to reply.

reply

YOU MAKE A LOT OF SHIT UP.😂

reply

No, that's exactly what you do! this isn't something new, it's a thing you could have found back on the old IMDB boards....

theres always, 5 or 6 people who don't have a social life and so they make a board into like their family, friends and social circle. little inside jokes created on purpose , instead of being organic and actually funny...

a circlejerk of defending each other in this most embarrassing cringeworthy way, "if you attack one! you attack all!"

which means sooner or later, another member of the 80,000 comment club will appear to tell me you're a great guy!

it's like bloodshot, MC doesn't have a signature option,so this poor prick has to write "signed, million man" after every single comment, which he's done for years.

for what? because he posted the mllionth comment on a website thats a copy of another, that 12 people use.

it's sweet in a way, but it's tragically sad.

reply

YEAH...I GET IT...YOU'RE LONELY....IT'S FAIRLY CLEAR FROM THE WAY YOU POST.....IT WILL GET BETTER,BUDDY...REALLY.🫂

reply

i havent posted here 80,000 times and got a little special sticker for contributing...

great comeback though!

reply

YEAH...NOTHING YOU SAID HAS ANY EFFECT ON WHAT I SAID.....YOUR BEHAVIOUR CLEARLY SHOWS A THAT YOU SUFFER FROM A LACK OF HUMAN COMPANIONSHIP.

reply

your comment would have more weight to it, if you hadnt posted here 80,000 times, got a little sticker for being a special little contributor. it really would.

who are you planning to spend your virtual christmas with? shogun? bloodshot? andy?

better get that walmart microwave meal for one in!

accept it princess, 80,000 comments or not, special sticker or not.. we can post what we like here.

reply

I WILL PROBABLY SPEND CHRISTMAS WITH MY DAUGHTER AND MY PARTNER....AS I USUALLY DO.



NO DOUBT I WILL WISH MANY HERE A HAPPY CHRISTMAS THOUGH.


AND YOU CAN POST ANYTHING YOU LIKE....THIS SITE DOES HAVE MODERATION AND STANDARDS THOUGH.😘

reply

"partner"

that says it all.

reply

HOW SO?

reply

Honestly, I kind of get what you're saying. I had an experience with it here:

https://moviechat.org/nm3078932/Lady-Gaga/65ef4da8a72803243944eb3a/Spoke-out-on-trans-issues-in-powerful-message

There is a certainly a clique on this site where a group of posters will rush to the likes of Kowalski's defense in these circumstances (I had a good time with some of them Friday night, coincidentally). Many of them have 20k+ posts, are well known around the forums and it can be intimidating to newcomers, though I suspect you've been around longer than 94 posts.

This comes up most often with Kowalski, which is related you your emphasis on him here. I'm not sure if his eagerness to engage in conflicts is augmented by the support that he knows he'll get, but nonetheless others perceiving what's going on may view it that way.

But, having said that, I think your criticism of what amounts to making friends, or "family" as you stated, here is misguided. You're conflating Kowalski's general habit of being a dick with some sort of notion that making friends here is a bad thing.

reply

He is the pot calling the kettle black. He has been here for years constantly changing his user name. Ol' gooseboy got issues.


Signed, million man.

reply

No, people really do convert their interactions here into some kind of nuclear family. they really do.

In kowalskis mind, after 80,000 comments here, and a special thing on his profile saying he's a good boy, this means that any other comment or thread he doesn't personally authorize... is like me coming in your house, not taking off my shoes and changing the channel.

you're putting words in my mouth, i think it's fine for someone to come here and make a "friend"

but there are 5 or 6 users here who made this website their entire existance. and will go nuts if you dare comment or post something in their "home"

go look at the pinned "reporting" thread on here, look at them!

"no! you're blocked for saying i'm blocked! hehehe! no! you're blocked for saying blocked hehehe! no! you are! no! you are hehehe"

losers

reply

i've singled kowalski out, because kowalski couldn't bare the fact that melton had the nerve to actually create a thread that kowalski didn't approve of.

Great observation, and an excellent analysis in general of Kowalski’s sad psychology.

You forgot about his predatory homosexual activities, though…

Hey Kowalski, show everyone what I’m talking about and say something really gay…

reply

😂 YOU COMPLETE ME.

reply

Do GD users commonly go to the politics board and badmouth users there?

reply

Was that mentioned in my post?

reply

No. You did not. Do GD users commonly go to the politics board and badmouth users there?

reply

That's a great question. Have you considered browsing through the politics board to answer it?

reply

I’ve never considered it, mostly because I don’t come to a film forum to discuss politics.

reply

NO IT ISN'T....THAT COUNTERPOINT DOES NOT BELONG HERE AND IS NOT GOOD TO HEAR.

reply

this thread isn't about politics, it's about a user who has been here for years on both boards.

if you don't like the thread, then fine. thats ok, but when instead of ignoring it, you get involved, respond to it maybe 10 times, all in caps and all agressive...

then you seem to decide what and what shouldn't "belong here" i dunno..

like i said, some people come to these websites and after posting enough times make the whole thing into like their adopted family and think only their threads should be allowed.

it becomes this really clicky circlejerk of 5 or 6 users who kiss each others ass

reply

NO POLITICS OF ANY KIND OF THE GENERAL DISCUSSION BOARD.



THE REST OF THAT IS YOU PROJECTING....KNOCK IT OFF.😘

reply

That's your opinion. You've already read mine.

reply

POLITICS AREN'T DISCUSSED HERE...THUS THE POLITCAL WEIRDOS ARE NOT DISCUSSED HERE.


EXCEPT WHEN THEY DRAG THEIR SHIT OFF THEIR BOARD AND DROP IT HERE...WHERE IT IS NOT WELCOME.

reply

"Is filmflaneur a Skavau sock?" is not a politically oriented question.

reply

NO...IT'S FLAMING THOUGH...ALSO AGAINST STANDARDS....IT'S A CALL OUT THREAD...WHICH IS FLAMING AND USUALLY DELETED.



WITHIN THE THREAD THOUGH....POLITICS ABOUND.

reply

I agree in that I'm not a fan of call out threads. I often wonder why they aren't removed.

You're calling out someone for posting this in GD when it would be equally inappropriate to post it in the politics board, according to your own premise there. It undermines where you're coming from here and, at least from my perception where coming across jabs at politics posters in the GD boards is common, it comes across as more of an expression of your contempt of the users on this site that primarily post on the politics board than a desire for people to post in appropriate places.

reply

I DON'T DRAG GENERAL DISCUSSION BULLSHIT TO POLITICS...THUS I AMNOT THERE TO CALL OUT CALL OUT THREADS.


THE ONLY TIME CERTAIN POSTERS KNOWN FOR THE POLITICS BOARD MOST POST HERE IS TO SPREAD THE FILTH....WE ALL KNOW IT'S TRUE.


WHAT I COME ACROSS AS OR SOUND LIKE IS IRRELEVANT....I AM NOT THE POINT.

reply

I don't feel like digging through your ample post history, but it wasn't long ago you were spamming the politics board with GD material in protest of the perceived wrongs you're referring to.

The rest confirms what I mentioned about your distaste for politics board posters being your primary motivation here rather than ensuring that something is posted in the right place on this website.

reply

NO...I WAS POSTING RANDOM GENDIS TOPICS THERE ON THE URGING OF A POLITICS POSTER WHO WAS POSTING POLITICS HERE AND SAID I SHOULD OUT OF FAIRNESS.


THE REST IS YOU MISREADING.😉

reply

"THE ONLY TIME CERTAIN POSTERS KNOWN FOR THE POLITICS BOARD MOST POST HERE IS TO SPREAD THE FILTH....WE ALL KNOW IT'S TRUE."

When you throw out a statement like that instead of responding to:

"You're calling out someone for posting this in GD when it would be equally inappropriate to post it in the politics board, according to your own premise there. It undermines where you're coming from here and, at least from my perception where coming across jabs at politics posters in the GD boards is common, it comes across as more of an expression of your contempt of the users on this site that primarily post on the politics board than a desire for people to post in appropriate places."

...it comes across as a confirmation.

I thought you've been working on yourself more, but your habit of being a dick while championing some pretense you're wrong about to sugar coat your bullying seems to be popping up again. It's clear you don't care about where this is posted but are using it as a front to attack politics board posters.

reply


DUDE....YOU ARE WRONG...AND BEING A DICK.


KNOCK IT OFF....I STILL LOVE YOU...BUT KNOCK IT THE FUCK OFF.


SIDETRACK BLAH BLAH BLAH BULLSHIT.

reply

If I'm being a dick, then you're being an asshole.

Pussies don't like dicks, because pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also fuck assholes - assholes who just want to shit on everything. Pussies may think they can deal with assholes their way, but the only thing that can fuck an asshole is a dick, with some balls. The problem with dicks is that sometimes they fuck too much, or fuck when it isn't appropriate - and it takes a pussy to show 'em that. But sometimes pussies get so full of shit that they become assholes themselves, because pussies are only an inch-and-a-half away from assholes. I don't know much in this crazy, crazy world, but I do know that if you don't let us fuck this asshole, we are going to have our dicks and our pussies all covered in shit.

But enough of that. Let's be friends.

reply

😂🫂

reply

your habit of being a dick while championing some pretence you're wrong about to sugar coat your bullying

Excellent analysis of Kowalski’s true intentions.

reply

It turns into politics because someone always comes in and says leftist this leftist that.


Signed, million man.

reply

Or MAGA this, MAGA that. It really seems like you can't get away from it.

reply

Right. I had hoped with Trump winning that this would go away but it seems people have doubled down on it. Oh well.

Signed, million man.

reply

Skavau is a regular on Reddit and flimflam is a filmboards poster. I've gone into other details elsewhere, but they're not the same person.

reply

I haven't heard the name filmflaneur in years. But I remember him from IMDb. He's a legit poster in his own right.

reply

‘Years’? Kid sounds like a twelve-year-old who’s just discovered a dictionary (and can’t read it) 🤷🏻‍♂️

reply

I remember him as a smug pretentious holier-than-thou liberal. But he wasn't dumb.

reply

Ah, well this incarnation of him is a hideous combination of really smug, and really fucking stupid.

reply