Let’s look at the evidence, and feel free to add your own observations.
1. Skavau runs away from the entire site in humiliation immediately after Trump’s victory (his 2 years of gaslighting utterly failed and backfired) and coinciding with this Flimflam emerges as a 24/7 incessant poster doing a practically identical routine - trolling and interrogating anyone who resists the regime and its bullshit narratives.
3. Both are low IQ yet smug pseudo intellectual Brits who deal in bad and transparent sophistry.
4. Both feel like ‘bots’ - they lack humanity, invention, humour, and have robotic, repetitive speech patterns that feel… mechanical.
5. If Skavau is being ridiculed, Flimflam will often appear to try and defend him and take the heat off.
6. Both demand answers to a barrage of questions, pretending to be curious Socratic inquisitors, yet hypocritically run away from and evade questions they find challenging.
I’ll add more as we go. Of course, it’s possible that they’re simply both regime cultists and that will naturally attract similar personality types, but the similarities here are more striking than usual.
What do you think? Is Flimflam Skavau’s sock, or does Skavau just wear him like one when they’re alone? 🤔
I DO NOT DESPISE YOU,BUDDY.....IF ANYTHING...I PITY YOU....YOU ARE MISSING OUT ON SOME GREAT CONVERSATIONS AND MAYBE EVEN A FRIEND OR TWO WITH THIS TWISTED LITTLE SHTICK OF YOURS.
NO...NO SHOVING BACK....OR FORWARD....YOU ARE THE WORST....YOUR MC RESUME SAYS NOTHING GOOD.....BUT I DON'T DESPISE YOU....YOU'RE JUST THE WORST....MAYBE YOU CAN GET BETTER?🤔
No, dildo, your creepy mask of faux-friendliness is the topic of this sub-thread. If you were capable of reading instead of narcissistically screaming about yourself in all-caps on a constant loop then you wouldn’t make such a prick of yourself. Try it.
YOU SEEM TO THINK YOU FOUND A BONE...BUT YOU HAVEN'T....THAT ISN;T HOW THE RULE IS APPLIED AND EVENIF IT WAS THE MODS HAVE GRACIOUSLY ALLOWED ME MY GIMMICK....IT IS WHAT IT IS....WE SHOULD MOVE PAST THIS....I WOULD GENUINELY LIKE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR OPINIONS ON FILMS
WHY DO YOU FLAUNT RULES #3 & #4 OF THE SITE'S STANDARDS?
Content that harasses, intimidates or bullies an individual or group of individuals
Content that incites hatred against, promotes discrimination of, or disparages an individual or group on the basis of their race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, age, nationality, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, or other characteristic that is associated with systemic discrimination or marginalization
You very clearly are, and you dodged the question again. How come you keep flaunting Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?
It’s not allowed, that’s why it’s a rule. Once again, how come you keep flaunting Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?
I AM NOT...FROM POST NUMBER ONE I HAVE BEEN WHO I AM AND THE SITE HAS WELCOMED ME...NO FLAUNTING...JUST BUSINES AS USUAL...NOW....ABOUT YOUR ISSUES WITH BREAKING THE RULES.
Demonstrably wrong, that nasty little fucker is actively trying to get me banned… again.
He might present as a jovial troll, but his true nature is another fetid narcissistic Little Hitler Leftist like Skavau whose primary goal is to get wrongthinkers censored and banned.
He also sprays his obnoxious all-caps diarrhoea all over the site, spoiling countless movie discussion threads so that he can scream about himself some more.
And that’s before we even discuss his constant predatory homosexual activities - using this site as his own personal Grinder, trying to pick up straight men.
I'm not attacking or defending anyone Melton, I'm just presenting honest testimony about a poster that I've grown to love and appreciate a great deal over the last several years.
KOWALSKI may not be your cup of java but he is my good buddy. We should all aim to be buddies Melton.
Eat shit you nasty censorious authoritarian bitch.
In addition to your aggressive predatory homosexual flirtation, there are increasing rumours that you’re into underage boys. If that’s true, respond to this post with a ‘😘’ emoji. Go…
YOU POST ANGRY BULLSHIT AND NAME CALLING NASTINESS ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY.....YOU DESERVE A BAN....BUT I AM NOT IN CHARGE OF BANS NOR ANGLING FOR YOU TO GET ONE.....SIMPLY POINTING OUT HOW FUCKING STUPID YOU SOUND ON A POST BY POST BASIS.😘
Let’s try again. Do you deserve a ban for relentlessly breaching Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?
WHY DO YOU FLAUNT RULES #3 & #4 OF THE SITE'S STANDARDS?
Content that harasses, intimidates or bullies an individual or group of individuals
Content that incites hatred against, promotes discrimination of, or disparages an individual or group on the basis of their race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, age, nationality, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, or other characteristic that is associated with systemic discrimination or marginalization
You dodged the question. Do you deserve a ban for relentlessly breaching Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?
You dodged it again. Do you deserve a ban for relentlessly breaching Rule 18 of this site’s Terms & Conditions regarding the excessive use of capital letters?
TECHNICALLY YOU REPEATING THIS SO MANY TIMES IS SPAMMING....THAT IS PROHIBITED....YOUR BULLYING IS AGAINST THE RULES TO....AND FLAMING...TROLLING...ETC ETC ETC
NICE DEFLECTION FROM YOUR OWN TRANSGRESSIONS...BUT NOBODY IS BUYING IT BUDDY.
IN FACT I AM ONLY RESPONDING TO INFLATE THAT POST COUNT...CHASING SHOGUN FOR TOP SLOT.😉😉
Well that desperate flurry of evasion didn’t work.
You frantically nag the mods to try and get other users banned based on site rules while flaunting Rule 18 75,000+ times and counting, expecting to get a free pass.
I MADE ONE POST ABOUT YOU BEING A NEGATIVE TO THE SITE BASED ON YOUR POSTS....I WOULD HAVRDLY CALL THAT FRANTICALLY NAGGING....YOU THROW HYPERBOLE AND OUTRIGHT LIES AROUND WILLY NILLY.
Bullshit, you’ve tried to get me censored and banned several times and god knows how many other users you’ve tried to ban while flaunting Rule 18 75,000+ times and counting, expecting the mods to give you a free pass.
Hypocritical, entitled prick.
Now, let’s address these rumours floating around about your sexual predations extending to minors. If they’re true, reply to this post with the following text:
FALSE...INSANE HYPERBOLE ON YOUR PART...YOU HAVE INFLATED THIS WHOLE MATTER TO INSANE PROPORTIONS....AND REPEATED YOURSELF INTO THE GROUND....FEEL BETTER?....PERHAPS WE CAN MOVE ON?...TALK ABOUT MOVIES OR SOMETHING?
FALSE...INSANE HYPERBOLE ON YOUR PART...YOU HAVE INFLATED THIS WHOLE MATTER TO INSANE PROPORTIONS....AND REPEATED YOURSELF INTO THE GROUND....FEEL BETTER?....PERHAPS WE CAN MOVE ON?...TALK ABOUT MOVIES OR SOMETHING?
Dumb bitch. With contemporary film Woke is the dominating issue - a cult that poisons virtually everything Hollywood shits out, so obviously it gets the appropriate attention.
(Much to the fury of committed ball-less wokists like yourself 🤣)
That is Skavau-level gaslighting. Do better, woke bitch.
In addition to your aggressive predatory homosexual flirtation, there are increasing rumours that you’re into underage boys. If that’s true, respond to this post with:
Let's look it, I think Skavau was way too invested in moviechat and his crusade for "justice" to simply walk away. he was able to respond within seconds and care enough to report people. so for him to simply walk away doesnt make sense.
But he was embarrassed and hurt when President Trump won and theres the accusations that he and various others here engaged in videochat masterbation sessions.. so i think he already had the filmflaneur sock a few months back, knowing this time would come. he's simply stopped using the Skavau sock.
Other evidence? the deflection technique where instead of staying on topic, he'll go off on some rant about something else as to "win", the pretenciousness of using phrases like "ad-homimen" thiniking it's clever. demand you answer his questions...
And yep, Filmflany only seems to be active on posts which concern skavau (expect him here within minutes)
Case closed.
Edit: wait, they're both brits!?!? i didn't know that! come on...it's too obvious!
It was merely a suggestion, since filmflaneur doesn’t post in GD and Skavau rarely posts here. You could always post it in Politics too and double the exposure.
LMAO...HAVE YOU MADE A SINGLE GENUINE POST?....EVERY SINGLE THING YOU POST IS RUDE OR POLITICAL OR FOOLISH....MOSTLY RUDE.....ANYDY IS BEING WAY TO DIPLOMATIC AND POLITE...YOU DO NOT DESERVE IT.🙂
Err, hold on. The thread topic is not political, yet Kowalski is spamming the thread because he’s rage dumping over Trump’s victory (and the abandonment of his butt-boss). I’m simply calling what I see.
Definitely a troll account, despite having film in their name all of their posts are either on the politics or religion boards. Could be a sock of someone that doesn’t want to discuss those topics from their main account.
The account is also only 3 months old, as has done most of its posting after the election.
Some comments –replies written by filmflaneur stink of Skavauness:
And you didn't answer my question either.
Evasion noted.
Evasion still noted.
Still no links provided.
However, skavau would ask more questions (sometimes his replies were just a series of questions), be very supportive of the lgbt community, and demand provision of evidence "provide evidence that". Also, if you check out filmflaneur's first posts, someone writes "I remember you from the IMDB board. You the same guy?" and filmflaneur replies "Indeed I am. But I don't like it much here, it is too quiet and one has to wait minutes before making a second post." He also complained that the politics board is right-wing.
It is more probable that they are both regime cultists from the UK and that this filmflaneur is present now after Trump's win looking for debates with right-wingers.
NO...IT'S A CALL OUT THREAD...WHICH IS FLAMING...AGAINST THE RULES ALL BY IT'S SELF....BUT IGNORANT WEINERS LIKE YOURSELF ARE DROPPING POLITICS HERE...ALSO AGAINST THE RULES.....BE A BETTER PERSON.
?? I'm not discussing anything political, how can I be dropping politics? There's a reason Melton posted it here on the General forum. It has nothing to do with politics. Chill out.
If there's a mouthy miscreant on this forum, that would be skavau, who enjoys bad-mouthing his opponents again and again when he has no arguments left to expose. I remember single (even short) replies of his with several curses, such as "fucktard", shitface etc. Where was Kowalski then? As a highly (the most?) regular poster he certainly knew very well what kind of lowlife skavau is. But I guess he's tolerant towards skavau's antics and vulgarity because both are lgbt-friendly, if not lgbt members. He called me out of the blue a butthole (I had no previous clash with him), supposedly because my post was political, against the rules (which ones?) and out of place on this General forum, and yet I think the reason he dislikes me is because I'm not lgbt-friendly.
Yeah, the Books of Blood is a masterpiece collection of short stories and some of them have been adapted to the big screen: Lord of Illusions, Midnight Meat Train, Candyman, Book of Blood etc. And since you liked it, I recommend the 5 stylish comic books Tapping The Vein, based on 10 stories of the Books of Blood.
He also complained that the politics board is right-wing.
It is more probable that they are both regime cultists from the UK and that this filmflaneur is present now after Trump's win looking for debates with right-wingers.
Kowalski is one of these sad people that you usually see on boards like this, they go all the way back to the IMDB days, they turn people here into their "family" and create little inside jokes for themselves to cream over. bloodshot is another one.
someone like kowalski doesn't want a thread like this here, a valid thread, he wants only his little pointless threads where he tells you what he had for breakfast, while all the other simpletons reply with emojis and say what a good guy he is.
I think you're singling out Kowalski too much here, but it is nice to see some counterpoint opinions when the usual trend is for the GD people to badmouth the politics crowd.
I'm singling him out because i see someone who is doing something i've seen on the internet for years, someone like kowalski has been here for a long time, and so he thinks that this whole website is his, he's made people here into his family, surely because he doesn't have a real one, it's this old cringeworthy thing where people purposely create inside jokes, defend each other in this "ooohh i've got butterflies in my stomach!" kind of way..
this little board circlejerk of about 5 or 6 users here which is so tragic.
i've singled kowalski out, because kowalski couldn't bare the fact that melton had the nerve to actually create a thread that kowalski didn't approve of.
kowalski could have ignored it, gone on about his little "i like this song, how cool am i" threads.. but no, he had to reply.
No, that's exactly what you do! this isn't something new, it's a thing you could have found back on the old IMDB boards....
theres always, 5 or 6 people who don't have a social life and so they make a board into like their family, friends and social circle. little inside jokes created on purpose , instead of being organic and actually funny...
a circlejerk of defending each other in this most embarrassing cringeworthy way, "if you attack one! you attack all!"
which means sooner or later, another member of the 80,000 comment club will appear to tell me you're a great guy!
it's like bloodshot, MC doesn't have a signature option,so this poor prick has to write "signed, million man" after every single comment, which he's done for years.
for what? because he posted the mllionth comment on a website thats a copy of another, that 12 people use.
your comment would have more weight to it, if you hadnt posted here 80,000 times, got a little sticker for being a special little contributor. it really would.
who are you planning to spend your virtual christmas with? shogun? bloodshot? andy?
better get that walmart microwave meal for one in!
accept it princess, 80,000 comments or not, special sticker or not.. we can post what we like here.
There is a certainly a clique on this site where a group of posters will rush to the likes of Kowalski's defense in these circumstances (I had a good time with some of them Friday night, coincidentally). Many of them have 20k+ posts, are well known around the forums and it can be intimidating to newcomers, though I suspect you've been around longer than 94 posts.
This comes up most often with Kowalski, which is related you your emphasis on him here. I'm not sure if his eagerness to engage in conflicts is augmented by the support that he knows he'll get, but nonetheless others perceiving what's going on may view it that way.
But, having said that, I think your criticism of what amounts to making friends, or "family" as you stated, here is misguided. You're conflating Kowalski's general habit of being a dick with some sort of notion that making friends here is a bad thing.
No, people really do convert their interactions here into some kind of nuclear family. they really do.
In kowalskis mind, after 80,000 comments here, and a special thing on his profile saying he's a good boy, this means that any other comment or thread he doesn't personally authorize... is like me coming in your house, not taking off my shoes and changing the channel.
you're putting words in my mouth, i think it's fine for someone to come here and make a "friend"
but there are 5 or 6 users here who made this website their entire existance. and will go nuts if you dare comment or post something in their "home"
go look at the pinned "reporting" thread on here, look at them!
"no! you're blocked for saying i'm blocked! hehehe! no! you're blocked for saying blocked hehehe! no! you are! no! you are hehehe"
i've singled kowalski out, because kowalski couldn't bare the fact that melton had the nerve to actually create a thread that kowalski didn't approve of.
Great observation, and an excellent analysis in general of Kowalski’s sad psychology.
You forgot about his predatory homosexual activities, though…
Hey Kowalski, show everyone what I’m talking about and say something really gay…
reply share
this thread isn't about politics, it's about a user who has been here for years on both boards.
if you don't like the thread, then fine. thats ok, but when instead of ignoring it, you get involved, respond to it maybe 10 times, all in caps and all agressive...
then you seem to decide what and what shouldn't "belong here" i dunno..
like i said, some people come to these websites and after posting enough times make the whole thing into like their adopted family and think only their threads should be allowed.
it becomes this really clicky circlejerk of 5 or 6 users who kiss each others ass
I agree in that I'm not a fan of call out threads. I often wonder why they aren't removed.
You're calling out someone for posting this in GD when it would be equally inappropriate to post it in the politics board, according to your own premise there. It undermines where you're coming from here and, at least from my perception where coming across jabs at politics posters in the GD boards is common, it comes across as more of an expression of your contempt of the users on this site that primarily post on the politics board than a desire for people to post in appropriate places.
I don't feel like digging through your ample post history, but it wasn't long ago you were spamming the politics board with GD material in protest of the perceived wrongs you're referring to.
The rest confirms what I mentioned about your distaste for politics board posters being your primary motivation here rather than ensuring that something is posted in the right place on this website.
"THE ONLY TIME CERTAIN POSTERS KNOWN FOR THE POLITICS BOARD MOST POST HERE IS TO SPREAD THE FILTH....WE ALL KNOW IT'S TRUE."
When you throw out a statement like that instead of responding to:
"You're calling out someone for posting this in GD when it would be equally inappropriate to post it in the politics board, according to your own premise there. It undermines where you're coming from here and, at least from my perception where coming across jabs at politics posters in the GD boards is common, it comes across as more of an expression of your contempt of the users on this site that primarily post on the politics board than a desire for people to post in appropriate places."
...it comes across as a confirmation.
I thought you've been working on yourself more, but your habit of being a dick while championing some pretense you're wrong about to sugar coat your bullying seems to be popping up again. It's clear you don't care about where this is posted but are using it as a front to attack politics board posters.
If I'm being a dick, then you're being an asshole.
Pussies don't like dicks, because pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also fuck assholes - assholes who just want to shit on everything. Pussies may think they can deal with assholes their way, but the only thing that can fuck an asshole is a dick, with some balls. The problem with dicks is that sometimes they fuck too much, or fuck when it isn't appropriate - and it takes a pussy to show 'em that. But sometimes pussies get so full of shit that they become assholes themselves, because pussies are only an inch-and-a-half away from assholes. I don't know much in this crazy, crazy world, but I do know that if you don't let us fuck this asshole, we are going to have our dicks and our pussies all covered in shit.