For the life of me I don’t know why I continue to reply to you. It’s like beating a dead horse!
I don't know why you're so upset.
Finally!! You got it!! But, your very first reply to him was loud and clear!
Her as a person and her career is still "her being a respected artist" even though they are two separate things. It's a knock on
her career, but it's still a knock on her as an artist and not as a person.
Neither music or career was not in your reply…only the artist.
This is what Andy's first comment was:
"A great voice that surpassed her discography. Yes, she had half a dozen huge hits, but unfortunately lacked the consistency of many of her peers."
He referred to
her discography. You can see that he mentioned "her" when referring to her career. You said that there was nothing negative in Andy's original comment, but he literally used the words: "unfortunately lacked the consistency". That's not a positive.
You chastised Wan King for “speaking somewhat negatively about a respected artist”.
I don't think you understand what "chastised" means. He often jokes that he likes most music and I pointed out my shock of him saying a slight negative toward a big name like Roberta Flack because he usually never does it. I didn't criticize him for his opinion, nor tell him he was wrong. I didn't even mention it in an angry tone. I don't know where you're getting "chastised" from.
Face it! You were at odds with him regarding a singer which is evident in your first reply.
What odds? "Andy, I can't believe you said something slightly negative about a singer" isn't exactly me starting a war with words. It isn't anything other than an observation. As I said earlier, I think you're looking way too far into this.
reply
share