Is "Speed 2: Cruise Control" (1997) really as bad as most say in your opinion?
Granted, yeah, its a lot worse than the very good original "Speed" (1994) by same director Jan De Bont and is arguably his weakest movie too and it is weak and forgettable but as bad as most say?
And even if you found it unsatisfying, was there anything good or redeeming about it?
And also... What did you think of the lead villain Geiger played by Willem Dafoe as well as his infatuation with leeches and did he really lose his job because his company found out that he used leeches as medicine? And this made him crazy and want to hi-jack the ship?
And any other elements to it.
Was the script, plot, action etc and acting all that bad in your opinion? Direction? Was it really totally unexciting and forgettable? Did it have noticeable plot holes and goofs that are irritating even by silly action movie standards?
Anyone here actually LIKED it, despite the flaws AND negative reputation overall, even if its definitely below "Speed" itself? Cheers.
P.S. And what do we think about it also being released same year, 1997, as another big boat hit - "Titanic"?