MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > 20-year-old female gets a boob reduction...

20-year-old female gets a boob reduction to go from 28H to 28C. Was it the right decision or a crime against humanity?

posted 3 years ago by joej2923 (3149)
63 replies | jump to latest

I am a male aficionado of boobs so I am quite distressed to see the desecration of H cup gazongas. She was complaining that her bra was so tight that she had migraines. There are bras designed for big hooters and it is possible to strengthen the back muscles to allow for large sweater kittens.

She's only twenty-years-old and her GAY/BLIND husband doesn't care about large funbags BUT she could be a flat-chested divorcee in a few years. It would have been smarter to keep the big melons since those look good even on a forty-year-old fatty. Should she have made an effort to preserve her top bollocks or was her decision appropriate? I'm saddened to see her globes go away since they were real and spectacular.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10615233/Woman-20-SIZE-28H-breasts-caused-migraines-pain-undergoes-life-changing-reduction.html

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

If it makes her life better. Who are we to say?

[–] 123Guy (7846) 3 years ago

I actually really enjoyed your post, as a living, breathing, blooding still pumping, male. :D
Keep up the good work! :D

[–] MaximRecoil (4863) 3 years ago

28H isn't even all that big. In terms of mass, it's the same as 30DDDD, 32DDD, 34DD, or 36D. The average bra size in the US is 34DD, and 36DD in the UK, according to Google, so her tits were about average size.

As to whether or not it was a "crime against humanity," who knows? There are no topless pictures of her. Her bra size plus clothed pictures of her isn't enough information to know if her tits were worth anything or not. The odds are against it, though. Most women don't have world-class tits.

[–] joej2923 (3149) 3 years ago

Averages/stats can be misleading. The problem with this 34DD average is that probably 75% of those ladies are fat chicks whose bellies dwarf their boobs. Women whose bellies are bigger than their boobs should be disqualified from the numbers. This lady is pretty slim as are most twenty-year-olds. Shoutout to dem twenty-year-old ladies!

One thing that concerns me is that her boobs were still growing. I think women's boobs are still growing at age twenty right? A lot of women get mommy boobs after pregnancy so she could have had 36H mommy boobs. Yum! I would think she wouldn't want to make that big decision until she knew that this guy was the one. I think she might regret this surgery later and she didn't make the effort to get special bras for her boobs.

[–] MaximRecoil (4863) 3 years ago

"Averages/stats can be misleading. The problem with this 34DD average is that probably 75% of those ladies are fat chicks whose bellies dwarf their boobs."

A woman with a 34DD bra size would only be fat if she was way under average height. "34" is the band size, and a 34" band won't fit around a fat woman's torso unless she's like 4'11" or something. If she's in the average height range with a 34" to 36" band size then she's not fat. For example, the woman with the greatest tits/torso combination in history, Yulia Nova circa 2000, was 36G (AKA: 36DDDD) and 5' 6" tall:

https://i.imgur.com/C1mNGdP.jpg (bikini picture; decide for yourself whether it's safe for work or not)

"One thing that concerns me is that her boobs were still growing. I think women's boobs are still growing at age twenty right? A lot of women get mommy boobs after pregnancy so she could have had 36H mommy boobs."

No one is going from a 28" band size to 36" without gaining a lot of body fat. Also, she probably wasn't even really a 28H, unless she's really, really short. A lot of women wear the wrong size bra because they've never been properly fitted for one.

Tits aren't normally still growing at age 20, but things like pregnancy or ordinary weight gain can make them grow (and weight loss can make them shrink) at any age.

[–] joej2923 (3149) 3 years ago

I didn't know that the 34 was the band size. I thought the 34 was the length of the boob and cup size was girth. Duh!
Some women are pear shaped so their added weight gain might not impact the band as much. Weight gain for apple shaped women would impact the band. I was reading that the band expands by three inches or so due to the material. There should be expandable bands similar to expandable waistband pants. I'm not going to research this because I don't want to know TOO much about bras.

I think she should have been looking for custom bras that fit better. She has a small frame but her boobs are huge. That would cause fitting room problems. My dad gave me a bunch of his dress shirts at age 21ish but it took me a couple years to figure out that the neck size was too small.

[–] MaximRecoil (4863) 3 years ago

There will always be exceptions, but as a general rule of thumb, a woman with a 34" or 36" band size isn't overweight. That's why 36-24-36 has long been famous as "perfect" measurements for a woman.

38" is getting up there, but if the woman is taller than average then she probably isn't overweight. 40" and larger nearly always indicates that a woman is overweight, unless she's extremely tall for a woman (e.g., 6'+).

And yes, bands can stretch some, but I'm talking about bras that fit properly. Women can force themselves into drastically wrong-sized bras if they want to. For example, this is a screenshot from a video where Yulia Nova stuffed herself into a tiny bra:

https://i.imgur.com/1WgNTX8.png

Her dialog during that scene, while laughing, was (Russian translated to English):

My breasts are so big, this bra is so small. This bra is so small that it is just like Cinderella's shoes.

[–] Mustang (5571) 3 years ago

I think she looks good either way. I have to admit I thought her pre surgery would be much bigger than they were.

[–] Who (5146) 3 years ago

[–] samoanjoes (58666) 3 years ago

Looks like a warped ginger root to me.

[–] bobbydallas (8683) 3 years ago

i wouldn't call 28C flat-chested by any means though
her 'after' photo looks sexy

but i also suspect it's a photoshop hoax
fake news i say, FAKE NEWS

[–] WandererFromYs (2406) 3 years ago

I think she committed a crime against herself. She’s not that attractive other than the presurgery big boobs, and she was clearly using her body to get attention on social media. Without the only thing that made her special physically, that is going to go away.

[–] chilone (18341) 3 years ago

I think she looks a lot better now and she is happy about it. Win-win.

[–] [deleted] 3 years ago

i think she's pretty attractive and i think she looks a lot better post-surgery.

she's thin, almost waifish really, and i think she looks more natural with smaller breasts.

[–] chilone (18341) 3 years ago

I'm not a fan of big boobs, really. Nice perky C cups are perfect for me.