MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Agenda to shut these boards down?

Agenda to shut these boards down?

posted 4 years ago by Roguemail (1614)
45 replies | jump to latest

Good god...the proliferation of posts about certain actresses and celebrities in the last day or so, with revealing pics and questions and statements about how hot they are etc.

What on earth is going on? Is it school vacation or something?

There is sone decent discussion to be had here, but some people seem intent on dumbing the forum down with this rubbish.

I wish these sad sacks would just go back to their basements and jerk off in private instead of spamming this board with their pathetic mastubatory fantasies.

[–] TearofLys (2641) 4 years ago

"Good god...the proliferation of posts about certain actresses and celebrities in the last day or so, with revealing pics and questions and statements about how hot they are etc."

I agree completely. No pictures of whores showing their ankles.

[–] Artisan (3464) 4 years ago

This site is poorly moderated and run. I don't want a Gulag situation either but the quality of posts at times is shockingly low and trolling is acceptable. There needs to be a middle ground. I have said this many times but I am of course the bad guy.

As quality declines soon you will have more idiots and less genuine users. Then the whole thing caves in.

[–] BillHicksFan (10559) 4 years ago

Notice she says "actresses"

I know I commented positively towards this post, but this is a shitty post by someone who hasn't posted in 4 months.

[–] AnubisRaydeen (7897) 4 years ago

I only read the stuff that looks interesting. I'd hate it if someone thought a thread I took interest in should be cancelled.

1. Start and participate in "decent discussions"
2. Skip what you consider to be trash.
3. Avoid calling for the hammer on anything other than site rules violations.
4. Enjoy freedom.

[–] AndyKing1967 (38073) 4 years ago

I think point 3 should have the caveat, 'unless discussing hammers, MC Hammer or acts of getting hammered'.

[–] AnubisRaydeen (7897) 4 years ago

Good point!

3a.unless discussing hammers
b.unless discussing MC Hammer
c.unless getting hammered
c.unless dialing phone for hammer delivery

[–] AndyKing1967 (38073) 4 years ago

Also, I think point 4 needs to include, 'unless you're not a fan of George Michael'
https://youtu.be/diYAc7gB-0A

'or Wham!'
https://youtu.be/BFwOs-jy53A

'or Pharrell Williams'
https://youtu.be/LlY90lG_Fuw

'or, for that matter, Beyonce'
https://youtu.be/7FWF9375hUA

[–] AnubisRaydeen (7897) 4 years ago

Damn. I really enjoy that George Michael song. It's not even my kind of music.

No. I think #4 must stand. In fact, I think I need to reword it as "Enjoy mandatory freedom"

[–] TheLovelyAnomaly (619) 4 years ago

I sure hope not. I may be a sparse commenter on here, but I do enjoy this site. I haven't seen much in the way of what you're describing--likely because I don't seek it out--but I don't doubt that it's been happening and I agree, people need to grow up.

[–] sokar (2098) 4 years ago

people need to grow up

About what. You do realise biology is a thing and peope like to discuss who isn't and is attractive between both men and woman.

Your statement just sounds like the Twitter puritans that cry about seeing girls with big boobs.

[–] Kowalski (75523) 4 years ago

LMAO...BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "IS HILARY SWANK HOT?" OR "I DONT FIND JENNIFER ANISTON ATTRACTIVE"...AND "HER FACE LOOKS LIKE,HAVE YOU SEEN THE WARLOCKS ON,ID LIKE TO PUNCH HER,I WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH"...AND A THOUSAND OTHER POSTS THAT ARE A MILE OFF "PEOPLE DISCUSSING WHO IS AND ISNT ATTRACTIVE".IN A CIVIL MANNER.

[–] sokar (2098) 4 years ago

So what, literally so what.

Don't like it, don't read it, really is that simple.

"HER FACE LOOKS LIKE,HAVE YOU SEEN THE WARLOCKS ON,ID LIKE TO PUNCH HER,I WANT TO HAVE SEX WITH

Again, so what, do you know these people personally? Do they read this board?

There is a ton of actresses i would love to have sex with, what is wrong with discussing that or do you blush with the very thought of people discussing it. This also isn't just what men do, wman do this as well, do you have an issue with that also are are you a simp white knight defending woman you don't know.

Replies like yours are the very definition of being offended on someone elses behalf.

[–] Kowalski (75523) 4 years ago

REPLIES LIKE YOURS TELL EVERYONE JUST HOW BAD YOU SUCK WITH THE LADIES.🙂

[–] TheLovelyAnomaly (619) 4 years ago

I have to agree with Kowalski. The issue isn't discussing physical attractiveness, it's how one goes about it. I don't deny that biology is a thing, but it is possible to talk about physical attractiveness or unattractiveness without being degrading.

[–] Artisan (3464) 4 years ago

The "I'd do her" etc posts are tiresome. Very big difference between that and someone just saying an actress is beautiful or sexy etc. Not expecting poetry from people but it doesn't have to be crass either.

[–] TheLovelyAnomaly (619) 4 years ago

Exactly!

[–] TimMC (9143) 4 years ago

Specifics...

IN all honesty I really don't know what you are referring to.

Carry on.