MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Porn star Ron Jeremy charged of raping 3...

Porn star Ron Jeremy charged of raping 3 women and sexually assaulting another.


https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/porn-actor-ron-jeremy-charged-rape-sexual-assault-n1231918

If convicted, he faces 90 years!

reply

That's shocking, he seemed like a real class act🙄

reply

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not. But despite his career, I have seen interviews of him on Youtube and watched him on the 'Surreal Life' and he does come across as a genuine, friendly non-threatening guy. Very intelligent too. I would be very surprised if he was capable of doing this. I wouldn't be surprised if the accusers only want his money which happens alot with celebrities especially in this whole dreaded MeToo movement. Destroying innocent peoples' lives with false accusations with no evidence for profit.

reply

Just tongue in cheek
Who can ever tell, let the court sort it out

reply

How do you prove something (especially a sex crime) did or did not happen when it allegedly occured YEARS ago? I do have a problem with people bringing up allegations now and not years back then. It would be easier to get DNA sample (semen, blood, hair, etc) and nab the pervert if it was early on and not 20 yrs later. It makes me believe some "victims" are disgruntled and wanting a payday for revenge.

reply

Oh, surely some are false accusations
The only thing we have are the courts

reply

That's a problem isn't it? It's also why so many women don't even bother.

I can't say what these women's motivation is, but unless they are selling stories to tabloids I'm not sure they are looking for a payout. This is going to criminal court, and they aren't suing him from anything that I've read.

If people aren't guilty, why would they pay out? That's always my question to statements like "It makes me believe some "victims" are disgruntled and wanting a payday for revenge." I just know that if I wasn't guilty of something I would do my best to make sure that I had my day in court. I know that people have unjustly been convicted of rape in the past, and that makes me sick too, but let's be honest that most of those were not rich white men. I just really hate the whole pay off situation with harassment and rape.

reply

ITS EASY AND AVOIDS A MESSY TRIAL WHERE THE FAMOUS PERSON WILL COME OUT LOOKING LIKE SHIT WIN OR LOSE...THE REAL QUESTION SHOULD BE WHY "VICTIMS" ARE WILLING TO TAKE SAID SETTLEMENTS.

reply

And how do they look when it finally comes out that they paid someone off? Guilty in my opinion.

I think that victims are willing to take settlements because the law doesn't take them seriously. Have you seen some of the things that judges have said to victims? Like " Why didn't you keep your legs closed or move lower so he couldn't penetrate you?" - that was Judge Camp. Or this from Judge Dean " as the gentlemen on the jury will understand , when a woman says no she doesn't always mean it. Men can't turn their emotions on and off like a tap as some women can".

I can't even imagine how difficult it must be for a victim who is male trying to get justice in court.

reply

IF THATS HOW YOU SEE IT,THATS HOW YOU SEE IT...

reply

Without getting too personal, I've lived it. The justice system is stacked against victims of sexual abuse. Female or male.

reply

[deleted]

Nope.

The reality is stacked against victims of sexual abuse. It's crime that it's a hell to prove because it's something that uses to be consensual and that happens in private, so proving it involves proving it wasn't consensual.

Actually, the burden of proof required in the case of sexual violence is way lower than in other crimes.

reply

HAVE YOU SEEN THE DOCUMENTARY...PORN STAR:THE LEGEND OF RON JEREMY?...HE COMES OFF AS FRIENDLY,INTELLIGENT,HUMBLE,WITHDRAWN,SAD QUIT FRANKLY...IM GONNA BE IN RON'S CORNER ON THIS UNTIL I SEE PROOF OTHERWISE...THE GUY WAS A SPECIAL NEEDS TEACHER...HE ISNT YOUR STANDARD PORN MEAT.

reply

I agree that he is not someone I ever thought I'd see that headline about.

reply

All those things can be said about Cosby too.

reply

THATS TRUE...ALTHOUGH COSBY SPENT YEARS CONVINCING US HE WAS WHOLESOME AND LOVABLE...RON HAS ALWAYS JUST BEEN RON...HE SEEMS MORE ON THE UP AND UP...THATS JUST MY FEELING.

reply

I don’t think neither rape any woman accusing them. It’s all about the money.

reply

"HE SEEMS MORE ON THE UP AND UP."

Hehehehe. I see what you did there. ;)

reply

can you work in the porn business and be a nice guy??

reply

I THINK THEYRE ALL PROBABLY NICE...THEYRE GETTING PAID TO HAVE THE TIMES THAT MOST GUYS GET MEAN OVER NEVER HAVING..

reply

i doubt that many of these guys have long term positive relationships with women

reply

OH..NO DOUBT...WHAT I KNOW OF THE ADULT INDUSTRY AND ITS STARS FROM MY 20S IS THEY GENERALLY MARRY WITHIN THE BUSINESS IF THEY MARRY AND IT DOESNT USUALLY LAST,UNLESS THEYRE WAY OPEN...WHICH IS A WHOLE OTHER STACK OF ISSUES...

reply

I dont see why not ,
"Hitman" on the other hand , i dont think so , no matter what the movies say

reply

[deleted]

Ha😆!

reply

The porn industry is full of this stuff.

reply

Oh, I don't doubt it happens, in an industry where performers are treated as disposable fucktoys.

Which doesn't mean I think it happened in this case, I have no evidence one way or the other.

reply

Were all here to become human sex toys.

reply

Ron Jeremy cameo in Killing Zoe

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=luSXXEz3C_Y

reply

[deleted]

Why would a man who gets paid to have sex with an endless supply of consenting women ever feel the need to rape them?

Ridiculous that the courts would bring a charge of rape against a porn star. It's like a dirty joke told by an idiot.

reply

Well, some guys are attracted or excited to the dominance aspect of rape. When it's consent even if it's a fake rape scene, it's 'boring' to them. With that being said, I don't believe Ron Jeremy to be a rapist at all.

reply

These allegations happened recently, the oldest being 2014 and the latest in 2019. He's fat, ugly and washed up now. I doubt any attractive woman would want to have sex with him now unless being paid.

reply

He's a classic porn star and a minor celeb. That can be a big turn-on for some women.

reply

I dunno, he's old and hideous now. I can imagine these allegations being true because he's not getting a fraction of the pussy he used to get.

reply

Of course, because men who don't get a fraction of the pussy they're used to get go crazy in a rape spree, sure!

By the way, what happened in those periods you got laid less than usual, can you tell us about your rape adventures?

reply

Is that you Ron? Are you messaging from your cell?

Most men don't have this massive contrast from having sex with beautiful pornstars, to being old, fat and unattractive. He probably doesn't understand that women don't want to sleep with him anymore, especially if they're not getting paid.

reply

Most men don't have this massive contrast from having sex with beautiful pornstars, to being old, fat and unattractive. He probably doesn't understand that women don't want to sleep with him anymore, especially if they're not getting paid.

On the other side we could say that most men don't have this massive contrast from having sex with beautiful pornstars, so they never will experience having lots of pussy. They probably don't understand that they never got laid easily, specially if they were not paying!

There's always an easy way to rationalize whatever you want to believe:

■ He is a porn star. Then he's used to get pussy easily, he doesn't understand a woman can say 'no': he's a rapist!
■ He was a porn star. Then he was used to get lots of pussy, he can't understand that's not happening anymore: he's a rapist!
■ He has never been a porn star. Then he thinks it's unfair porn stars get lots of pussy easily, he feels resentful: he's a rapist!

And that's why true justice must be based on evidence.

reply

Calm down Mr. Jeremy. No one is saying he's guilty or innocent, this is all conjecture from both sides. I'm simply making the point that, the fact that he was a pornstar doesn't make these allegations less likely to be true, especially in his current state.

reply

“He’s old and hideous now.” This made me chuckle because it’s not like he was ever good looking.

reply

Exactly, and now he can barely pass as a humanoid.

reply

I never understood how he became such a big star (in that field).

reply

Hmmm. Must be guilty.

reply

I don’t know why the guy with the biggest dick would have to rape anyone. The guy has probably fucked over 5000 women. How can he be that thirsty? You would think he’d be drained and kinda sick of pussy.

reply

Do porn stars have some sort of "code word" during their scenes if they want the other person to stop especially if it's a staged rape scene? If the actor continues with the scene even when the actress says the code word, then that's rape, is it not?

reply

Rape porn and other extreme porn just need to be banned. I mean, porn is okay, but there should be a line somewhere.

reply

I watch porn but never indulge in the rape stuff. Seems kinda creepy.

reply

But I also think a ban on porn is stupid. Interestingly, when I was in India last year for a trip, I couldn't go on PornHub and Brazzers and other various porn sites. Apparently, it's banned there. I wonder why. The notion that porn leads to 'moral decay' is just flat out dumb.

reply

Like I said, no need to ban all porn. But there should still be a line somewhere. There should be a limit to what can be considered entertainment. Movies can't endanger their stuntmen. Producers and studios have been sued when they don't make sure everything was safe. They can't even endager animals. Animals! And porn stars are human beings.

reply

These pornstars know what they're getting into. If a safeword is ignored, that's one thing. Otherwise people aren't mind-readers.

reply

That's why I gave stuntwork as an example. Those people also KNEW exactly what they're getting into. Still, the producers are responsible to ensure that everything is safe enough.

It doesn't happen in a night tho'. Hollywood stuntmen were treated poorly. They died left and right in the olden times. Nobody is concerned of their safety and wellbeing, they knew what they're getting into, they said. But the movie industry changed. Nowadays, stuntmen are treated relatively well. The porn industry can change too.

reply

I don't know what kind of porn you're watching, but it's not life or death like stunt work. If a pornstar is uncomfortable and fails to use their safeword that's on them.

reply

There are many kinds of porn. The fact that you don't watch the more extreme ones doesn't mean that they don't happen.

reply

Oh i've seen extreme porn, and it's not comparable to death defying stunts.

reply

Yeah? And destroyed anuses and genitals are still not comparable to being injured in doing stuntworks? Not every stuntman is dying, y'know. Some of them are just injured. Yet they can still sue the production company if the producers weren't making sure everything is safe enough. That's all I wanted to say. Don't reduce it into nothing is comparable to death yo.

reply

Destroyed anuses happen from years and years of anal scenes and also from their personal life. With stunt work all it takes is one screw up and your life is ruined. Again, not remotely comparable. Not sure why you're trying to make a comparison here.

reply

Okay.

reply

Rape porn and other extreme porn just need to be banned. I mean, porn is okay, but there should be a line somewhere.

Then the same could be said about killing or injuring people in movies. I mean, drama in movies is okey, but there should be a line somewhere. Movies with physical violence when somebody is killed or heavily injured, like westerns, or action movies, or marvel movies, they should be banned... isn't it?

reply

No. Porn are a little bit different than movies. Porn is real. They really have sex or whatever actions they considered "sex." It's like snuff movies or reality shows. You can't injure or kill people in a reality shows... can you? That's why I said stuntwork, not the movies themselves. Stuntmen really do get injured, or died for doing stuntworks even when the character in the movie itself aren't. The stuntwork is real, the violence in the movie is not.

reply

Aha.

So the problem is not what appears in the screen, but what happens in the set.

If that's the problem, then the camera is irrelevant. What you're advocating is to ban the fact itself. You're not advocating about banning bdsm porn, for example, but about banning bdsm as a whole and criminalizing it, isn't it?

reply

No. I was not advocating anything about bdsm porn. I was sugesting that some kind of things should be off limits to be considered entertainment. I don't know where the line should be set, but I would like to see a line be set. Somewhere.

Because some of the porn I found in the Internet should not be legal in my opinion. But looks like they are.

Just like when stuntmen were treated poorly and get injured or killed to make stupid entertainment we got to enjoy. They were ALL legal in those times. They would not be NOW. Criminal or not criminal can change.

Why the change? Because there were people who thought that it was wrong and they should be treated better. Do you think pornstars are being treated poorly or not?

reply

If what happens in the set is legal, I don't see why the recording should be illegal (as long it's consensual and there's a legit contract).

If what happens in the set is not legal, well, I'm no lawyer, but I think the recording is illegal right now, at least in most western countries. Snuff movies or porn where the actors were minors, for example, they're not legal.

reply

I know. That's why I don't know why some of those porn can still be legal. Like wtf is this shit? How can it be legal?? Stuffs like that. But looks like nobody cares about pornstars. They know what they're getting into.

Like I said, the treatment of stuntmen in the old days were legal too. They had contracts and all that. Again, they knew what they're getting into.

Yet today they can't be legal. What's legal or illegal can change.

reply

No. Porn are a little bit different than movies. Porn is real.
You've kinda painted yourself into a corner here with all this talk of stuntmen eh?
Its a far cry from your original "rape fantasy porn should be banned"

The rape fantasy porn isnt real , doesent involve real rape , so by the above logic shouldnt be banned
I'm kinda on the fence with that . I sure as hell wouldnt miss it,
but look at this way , the sick fucks that do watch are obviously wishing they could rape someone in real life,
and perhaps the existence of that kind of outlet will stop them.
Then again , it might just make them more likely to do it for real

On a lighter note , i totally dont get the modern obsession with Anal sex,
use the correct hole ffs! turd burglars.
But , you know , each to his own .. I dont think that should be banned


reply

Well, if they do it real because they can't watch rape porn then put them in jail. That's what the law is for.

reply

Do porn stars have some sort of "code word" during their scenes
well yeah - CUT!

reply

I bet this will end up in a "hung" jury.

reply