And no, not for the reasons that people are thinking (that they were the bad guys).
In my opinion, it's impossible to know what people who've committed such atrocities were "really thinking" unless one of them survived and can tell you. Anything else is just projection and speculation. This issue is why I stopped liking "I Shot Andy Warhol." When I first saw that movie, I thought it was brilliant "insight" into Valerie Solanas' mind. Then I did research, and it turned out that there was virtually nothing known about this woman at all. Because no one knew anything about her, the screenwriters made everything up.
That is exactly what would happen in this case. How on earth would a Westerner be able to really know what those guys were really thinking? It would be just speculation and projection.
Another reason why I wouldn't watch a movie like that is that if someone wants to do a movie from a criminal's perspective, it's because they sympathize with their motives or have an interest in humanizing them. People who commit atrocities should be understood but not humanized.
"unless one of them survived and can tell you."
well , there are 1000s of Islamic Extremists left alive to tell us , they are in fact literally screaming from the rooftops , which is part of the problem.
Yes, even if it isn’t entirely accurate as to the individual terrorists. I would like a window in on that world to better understand the indoctrination of terrorists. This kind of mind control can happen anywhere and crops up time and time again. It is important to recognize this behavior and to look for ways to prevent alienation, hostility, and other descents into anti-social, violence.
There is a fascinating series on HBO running now called Our Boys. It recounts the true story of four murders in Jerusalem, and subsequent investigations that led uprisings and a full blown war in Gaza in 2014. The miniseries goes inside deeply divided Israeli and Palestinian sub communities and gives insight into the roots of the hostilities and religious justifications for violence.
probably. i'm more interested in reading about such things than watching movies, but i'm not opposed to the idea.
the great french film 'nocturama' is a drama about a group of young terrorists who stage attacks in paris. it's one of my favourite films of the past 3 or 4 years.
it's not a 'boat,' but i think it's interesting & instructive to watch such things, and i'm open to seeing a good 'boat' terrorist film.
Probably not basically because there is more than a likely chance they will try and paint the terrorists up as victims of some sort and how the racist, Islamophobic etc etc West drove them to it.
Fair enough but knowing that I can only presume based on the usual track record of these things. I would not risk buying a book on the topic for that reason anyway, to answer your question.
I seen one a few years ago about the Hamburg cell leading all the way up to September 11th. I can't remember what it was called. They weren't portrayed sympathetically or anything especially that nutter Mohammed Atta.
That is what is on my mind. When the hijackers stayed in the USA most could not speak English well, they needed help filling out forms, finding a place to stay, money etc..According to the redacted pages of the 9 11 commission report, several Saudi Royals we're instrumental in providing the hijackers with help.
(Sigh...) I guess that Sauds are too strong of a strategic partner to make a big deal about it.