MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Hollywood doesn’t take risks on young ac...

Hollywood doesn’t take risks on young actors like they used to


It’s hard to think of any really famous under 30s actors. But look how young these stars where when they became super famous:

Tom Cruise - 19 - Risky Business
Kiefer Sutherland - 19 - Lost Boys
Charlie Sheen - 21 - Wall Street
Julia Roberts - 22 - Pretty Woman
Johnny Depp - 24 - Platoon
Kevin Bacon - 26 - Foot Loose

It’s a bigger bet to go with someone young, especially for big movies. But Hollywood should take the risk, because they can get more out of their talents.

Look at Russell Crowe, considered a great actor and was a big box office pull, but only became very famous at 36 with Gladiator. I feel that he got old over night compared to a lot of other actors because he was literally pushing 40 by the time they took a chance on him (probably given that he’s not American.)

Hollywood is all about mitigating risks, that’s why there are so many movies that are based on books or reboots, it’s a lesser risk (built in audience.)

reply

I think greed i$ why Hollywood won't take ri$k$ anymore. It's gotta be a sure thing, big $$ practically guaranteed. I think that's also why actors are sometimes miscast. Unless the project has a big name star attached to it, it's a no-go. So they cast the big star when really someone else would do it better. It's a shame.

reply

[deleted]

Hollywood doesn't take risks on new stories. That is my opinion on what's wrong today.

There a plenty of young stars. They have to make their mark in the industry.

reply

It does take risks, but not for long.

The suits giving all sorts of young actors breaks and chances, and then dropping them like a toddler's toy if they have a flop or two. I doubt it's ever been so hard to build a lasting career.

reply

I don't think that's true. Plenty of movies being made with young people. Hollywood just doesn't make small movies anymore. For a long while, TV was taking up the slack, but now TV has shifted into prestige programming, and it's just more Hollywood. Basically, nothing's been the same since we lost video rental.

reply

Who's the young lady in the new Star Wars Trilogy? What's her age?
(btw, I don't like her or those newer movies much, but she does seem fairly young.)

reply

Daisy Ridley. She was only 23/24 when cast for Star Wars

reply

Thanks. Now that you gave me her name I remember seeing it repeatedly but simply forgot it completely. Hopefully she has a great career, but I'm not sure how much this is helping her.
Even if they sell oodles of tix and merch, if she isn't convincing, I'm not sure what kind of work she'll get in the future.

reply

Armie hammer 27 - the lone ranger
Robert Pattinson 22 - twilight
Jesse eisenberg 27 - the social network
Ansel elgort 23 - baby driver
John boyega - 23 star wars: the force awakens
Miles teller 27 - whiplash

Mic drop

reply

Eisenberg did A LOT of work before TSN.

reply

So what, he was young. That’s what this thread is about not if they are unknown.

reply

Sorry, I was just pointing out a lot of people should have seen Jesse E well before 27 and TSN. Apologies if I am misunderstanding or misunderstood.

reply

well, i think there is a lack of risk out there now, but i don't really blame hollywood for that. i think they are in a very diminished position in a lot of ways, & very much are relying on large-scale block-busters to finance their business model.

there was an interesting interview with economist tyler cowen on the great podcast 'econtalk' about a year ago where he discussed the impact of the internet & piracy on film & music. i'll see if i can find a link to it - if i do, i'll edit it in.

cowen's point was that piracy in film has very much demolished the mid-range, medium budget film. those movies still exist, but in a much diminished state. compare the 70s, when you had daring, often brutally tough hollywood films like taxi driver or the deer hunter, to the current era, which is dominated mostly by large-scale films blandly created to appeal to as many people as possible. if you are looking for something left of centre, dark or quirky, you have to go to the snobby indie cinema screening it, or catch it on a streaming site.

there was a time when going to the theatre was one of, if not the top american passtime. now it's something that many people never do, or if they do it's to see the 3 or 4 event films of the year, the marvel film out now or the summer blockbuster.

& with the cratering of the rental/dvd market, basically hobbled by piracy, the economics of the mid-range, adult movie don't really make sense any more. there are exceptions. ladybird, brad's status, things like that. but they are true rarities now.

reply

There’s that Baby Driver kid.

reply