MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Anyone else getting nagged by the modera...

Anyone else getting nagged by the moderators here?


There is barely anyone here and this mod keeps bugging me every time I have an argument. I'm sorry, isn't this a discussion board? I'm not allowed to speak my mind? He called it "trolling" because some babies reported my posts when they lost an argument. It's unreal.

I want to support this site, but if I can't even have a discussion, what is the point? I just don't know if I'm the only one this is happening to.

reply

Maybe it's because you accuse Wonder Woman reviewers and supporters of being paid shills?

https://moviechat.org/tt0451279/Wonder-Woman/58c86e15d1ea5c14706e71f2/People-inside-are-already-confirming-its-another-mess?page=2

reply

A lot of these people are. I've been on these boards too long, I know a company man when I see one. You have the right to like the movie if you want, but to raise such ridiculously stupid rebuttals to points I've made to polish the turd seems a tad suspicious.

Your issue is that you think it ISN'T happening.

reply

So,with all due respect,if you don't enjoy the film why are you posting on that board? I mean you've obviously got every right to do so but if it's making you so angry (and yes! You do seem very angry) why would you continue?

reply

It's my right, who the eff are you?

reply

Well,moderator 2 told me that i spaming other members by using too many symbols.I told him that i am a short talking person,and i use emoji to expres my feelings instead of words.

reply

Oh my god, are you serious?!?! ๐Ÿ˜ฎ๐Ÿ˜ฎ๐Ÿ˜ฎ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

reply

That i'm a short talking person...yes,it's true๐Ÿ˜

reply

So then you are joking about the mod saying you are spamming by using too many symbols?

reply

No,i'm not joking...he actually said that to me.I use a smartphone,so how can i spam anyone by sending emojis?

reply

Everybody in the Emoji Movie Title game needs to be banned now.

reply

Why?

reply

He was joking. Because the thought of anybody getting warned for that is laughable.

reply

It is laughable,but he wasn't joking

reply

I've never actually seen Moderator 2 so far.

But if he's concentrated on counting emojis while at the same time Ben is parading around with several socks under his nose, maybe Mod2 should rethink his priorities.

reply

This guy is crazier than I thought. Wow.

reply

A couple of times because a crybaby was losing an argument and reported it. Mod 2. Kept saying I violated the rules, but when I asked him for specific examples, he couldn't give one; just kept repeating the same thing and kept dancing around an answer.

Was also beyond obvious he never read the entire thread in question. Also kept saying to use the report button to settle insults; must've repeated it 10 times. The few I did, which were equal to what he claimed I was guilty of, are still up.

Anyone know if Mod 2 is actually legit?

reply

Some of these people are marketing shills. There's just no way they can care so much about a stupid movie to use the insults they're making.

reply

Well, on another thread way back when Mod2 first came to be, the question was posed to Mod1 and she (pretty sure it's a she) said yes, Mod2 was legit. That was awhile ago.

reply

It's a discussion board, not an argument board. Maybe that's your problem...

Itโ€™s amazing how many people donโ€™t know how to discuss, only argue.

reply

Agree๐Ÿ˜‰

reply

Hah! This coming from someone who deliberately obfuscates in order to provoke and perpetuate a completely pointless argument?

Been hypocritical much lately ?

reply

I get it: because I called you out for having posted totally incorrect information on the Goodfellas board I "deliberately obfuscates in order to provoke and perpetuate a completely pointless argument".

Wow, somebody as an issue with having their wrong information corrected with actual facts.
Are you going to follow me around the site now......like a troll?

reply

Hello, everyone. Here to clarify a few points:

1. At the moment, we can't do anything about the archived threads, as much as we would like to. We know that there is some nasty stuff left over from IMDb, and Jim is looking into a solution.

2. Moderator2 is a real mod. However, he can still make mistakes like everyone else.

3. If you are being "nagged" by us mods, it is only because you don't seem to follow the rules. Again, it is possible for us to make mistakes.

reply

it is only because you don't seem to follow the rules


Mods, Admins and Owners should be held to a hire standard and also follow the rules set forth by the TOS. The nasty archived threads also violate the TOS set forth by MovieChat. Its not the users fault that they have not been deleted yet.

Out of two moderators there is only one person "nagging" users here.



reply

I'm not saying who is right... but if another moderator nags no one... that could also just mean they are too timid to do their job. Nagging too much isn't good... but nagging no one isn't good either. Clearly some people are trolling so one mod might be too lenient... while one might be too harsh.

reply

This guy is just ridiculous. You can't yell at anyone. Come on. I'm a little tired of these snowflakes who must be from California or Seattle who think we all need to live in harmony and not create negative karma...sorry, that's called a hive mind.

reply

I don't mind a healthy debate... but when I see overuse of retread insults such as snowflakes who need their safe space, libtard, cheeto, cuck, teabaggers... I no longer see potential for useful engagement but rather both liberal or conservative talking points on repeat. If you want to complain about a hive mind... then start by using original insults and not prefabricated templates that one can get ad nauseam on their twitter feed.

reply

Liberals are the worst when it comes to the insults, so please, watch yourself there. Thanks.

reply

I specifically chose overused words from both sides to make my point. Insult away... but use something fresh instead of recycling the same old crap over and over.

reply

You picked one at the end to cover your butt, biased lying d-bag.

reply

I also used cheeto... and I'll add murica for balance. All I'm saying is if either side uses those words, I almost always automatically assume they have little new to add and move on to the next comment.

reply

You will likely assume wrong at least half the time. All depends on the poster.

reply

Agree that it depends... but that is my honest kneejerk reaction... I've seen you make decent posts so I'd assume you were in a "fight fire with fire" flame war if I saw your name... but in most cases, when people's opening comment on a news article uses any of these tired cliched insults... I can't help but think... "This person has been deluded by morons liking their facebook posts that repeating the same insults over and over is somehow valuable to mankind, when in reality they've been given the cruel false hope that the reuse of these phrases is clever."

reply

I don't post on FB. In fact, I'm on it maybe once every 2 months. I consider it a colossal waste of time, and couldn't care less who likes what there. As far as me using some tired cliched insults, maybe, but IMO, the words "president trump" are one of the biggest insults to the United States and its people possible. I can't, in good conscience, use that term.

reply

The FB comment wasn't directed at you. What I've noticed is that lonely people go on FB and Twitter and if they put the MAGA tag and use snowflake, libtard... etc... they will automatically get a ton of positive reinforcement even if they don't say anything intelligent. This type of approval becomes addictive and they think if they try it everywhere that it will work very well. Liberals do this too of course but it's especially popular among Trump supporters.

reply

Sorry; thought it was. TBH, and I'll probably get flamed for this, IMO, maybe 2% of any comments on FB are intelligent. Most seem to be meaningless, narcissistic blather.

reply

Yes,I'm so fed up of seeing the word "snowflake" used.

reply

When I see it, I automatically assume the person has no originality of thought... even though that may not always be true. They do a disservice to their own argument by starting out with that word.

reply

If you consider the 2 or 3 who use it most, there's zero doubt of a lack of any original thought.

reply

Spot on. Seeing one of those words is just a clue to me to skip the rest. When it consistently comes from the same people, just seeing their name is enough to trigger the skip.

reply

Exactly... the irony is, if they calmly tried to explain their points... I would politely listen and try to absorb some of their information... but once those insults start... it's hard not to just go "Next" and skip to the next comment.

reply

1. At the moment, we can't do anything about the archived threads, as much as we would like to. We know that there is some nasty stuff left over from IMDb, and Jim is looking into a solution.

One of the things that attracted posters to this site was the archived IMDb threads.I think we as mature posters have to be adult about this and accept the bad with the good.Eventually they will probably disappear naturally.

reply

Looks like IMDB2 at Freeforums.net is the best place for free speech and the old IMDB experience.

reply

OK, move there. Bye.

reply

Or try talkshitalldayaboutliberalschat.org

reply

Think you meant to reply to GK

reply


I don't know if nagged is the right word, but I've heard from them several times. I brought up the same point. Apparently there are some snowflakes on here who are easily offended. You can debate something, but you do have to be careful.




๐Ÿ˜Ž

reply

I remember that time he nagged you and your co-argurer right on the thread itself!! When he first started. Like literally his first or second day on duty. I was like oh good lord!!!!

reply


Yeah. Never had this problem on the old IMDB.



๐Ÿ˜Ž

reply

Since you just violated the MovieChat standards by name-calling, I have reported you to the Moderators.
You should be hearing from them shortly.

Have a nice day.

(just following your lead, ace)

reply

I used to get hounded by the mods until we came to an agreement of sorts. I bring the beads and they bring the lube. I just wish mod 2 wasn't so rough :(

reply