Samantha Bee: There isn't a "smug liberal problem"
The smug is deep.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzdoIzEjhN8
The smug is VERY deep.
π
I just have to roll my eyes about her saying let's celebrate a free press while we still have one. Had Hillary been elected her gagging of the press during the election cycle would be nothing compared with if she had become President. There would have been NO dissent presented relative to a Clinton White House. And may God strike down the academic morons who justify this by saying the media only has a responsibility as to how they feel about people and events. No thanks to that. Media should use one standard and apply that evenly to the people and events covered.
shareAmen!
Liberals are only in favor of free speech when you agree with them. When they can't win the debate they simply try to silence you, as they did (temporarily) with Mr. Bill. Howard Dean
(the screamer) even stupidly tweeted that "hate speech is not protected by the First Amendment." Uh yeah, idiot, actually it is. Of course libs don't give a shit about the constitution. To them it's just a piece of paper standing between them and total control and their Fascist Socialist Utopia.
It also irritates me when they spout their idiotic "Love Trumps Hate" slogan. Oh really? It's not Conservatives who riot, loot, and burn when their candidate loses. The Left is the largest Hate Group in the world.
π
[deleted]
Wait, what is this? Is this really a news report posted on MC like a Google news suggestion? I clicked the user CNN and nothing. This. Is. Awesome. Jim opted to post ads as threads, nice marketing move, Jim.
shareI thought the same thing on the first similar thread I saw. I think the 'user' was ABCNews, and I thought 'Is ABC really registered on MC now?!" Then realized what was happening.
It was a smart move on Jim's part to further generate discussion. I had no idea this kind of thing was even available for forums.
Well, she's clear evidence that there is.
shareWhat a smug thing to say.
share