Why, Bless his heart!
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-calls-for-death-penalty-against-migrants-who-kill-u-s-citizens/ar-AA1s7Z6F?ocid=msedgntp&pc=ACTS&cvid=a71a6be3d46749f5846072343a3382fd&ei=45
What was his position yesterday?
Almost half the country supports the Death Penalty. Keep up the violent rhetoric and more states will join them.
shareWhere's the violent rhetoric, Mary?
"Almost half" means "minority."
Probably a "majority" of Americans support prosecuting anybody... who kills... anybody... even if the victim only has a green card...
Enjoy...
https://rumble.com/v5f6y5x-leftist-journalists-and-their-hateful-rhetoric.html
Remember, a tiny percentage of US states were constitutional carry until the 2020 riots....now 13 states do, and it will only go up from here.
Does someone have to be an American citizen to buy an assault rifle? What if they just have a green card?
"the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms shall NOT be infringed."
You're question is stupid because a Green Card is a path to legal status. 😂🤣
Illegals are illegals and any gun sale to them should be a crime but woke ideology is the flavor of the day.
I don't give a shit who owns guns legally... as long as they are not shooting people and committing crimes with them.
any gun sale to them should be a crime but woke ideology is the flavor of the day.
And yet republicans staunchly resist any change to gun laws, even such clearly obvious improvements like checking if the customer is crazy , or an illegal immigrant.
Thanks for nuthin'
https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/may-aliens-legally-united-states-purchase-firearms#:~:text=An%20alien%20legally%20in%20the,valid%20hunting%20license%20or%20permit.
"An alien legally in the U.S. is not prohibited from purchasing firearms unless the alien is admitted into the U.S. under a nonimmigrant visa and does not meet one of the exceptions as provided in 18 U.S.C. 922(y)(2), such as possession of a valid hunting license or permit."
[18 U.S.C. 922 (d)(5), (g)(5) and (y)(2); 27 CFR 478.11 and 478.32(a)(5) ]
So green card holders are OK... I suppose someone can get a "nonimmigrant" visa and get a license to hunt white people...
I had to go through the archives for this. The text in the link says it all.
https://moviechat.org/bd0000082/Politics/65f9df4f9d1d404956d84250/Illegal-immigrants-can-now-carry-guns-a-federal-judge-has-ruled?reply=6602bd2a63e69847d99d686d
Here is Trump complaining about stolen elections.
https://youtu.be/OjnX4IUt_eo?t=282
Stop trying to sell me, I'm already voting for him.
share“I’m hereby calling for the death penalty for any migrant who kills an American citizen or a law enforcement officer”
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-calls-death-penalty-migrants-kill-us-citizens-rcna175131
I guess fire-fighters have to wait another day...
Dude to needs to lay off the booger sugar for a day, take an adderall, and then tell us who ISN'T going to get the death penalty.
"I guess fire-fighters have to wait another day..."
The masses of firefighters that are not US citizens are no doubt furious.
You could say the same thing about law enforcement officers.
Thanks for the bump.
You could say that, but then you'd also be passively supporting the notion of non-citizens enforcing laws against citizens.
I'm sure scum like yourself takes no issues with that concept.
You lost me.
As I posted earlier: Probably a "majority" of Americans support prosecuting anybody... who kills... anybody... even if the victim only has a green card...
“I’m hereby calling for the death penalty for any migrant who kills an American citizen or a law enforcement officer”
"The masses of firefighters that are not US citizens are no doubt furious."
"You could say the same thing about law enforcement officers."
I can see that you are a moron and are confused about the statement, but you're low hanging fruit here and not worth much effort so we'll do this the easy way.
Are law enforcement officers that are not citizens still law enforcement officers? Yes.
Did the statement "...any migrant who kills an American citizen or a law enforcement officer." differentiate the two while still affirming the claim would apply to both categories? Yes.
Does the statement then suggest that this would apply to law enforcement, even when the law enforcement is not an "American" citizen? Yes.
So, would law enforcement be upset that the statement doesn't also apply to them because it doesn't apply to non-citizen firefighters?
Answer: They wouldn't. The statement applies to them. You are a moron who lacks reading comprehension enough to understand the meaning of the articles you link here, even when you quote the specific phrases from it that pertain to the discussion.
tl;dr
Trump hasn't called for the death penalty for migrants who kill fire-fighters.
Are they *not* given the death penalty for such crimes?
shareNot when liberal morons like you get their say. They sit in prison for 50yrs, sucking up taxpayer money like it was free.
shareWhat happened with your buddies that were using wetbacks for target practice at the Texas border a few years back? They were "aiming" their rifles "over the heads" but one of them got a hit. You were shocked when I told you that if you fire your gun straight up in the air and it hits somebody that's a crime.
shareDon’t we have the death penalty for murder period? 🤔
shareGoogle "Google"
shareStates determine what their laws are, some are more strict, some are less strict.
This is California's law:
https://www.cronisraelsandstark.com/special-circumstances-murder
California Penal Code 190.2(a) PC lists the often-changing specific situations that would qualify as special circumstances to elevate a murder charge. It should be noted that the courts and legislators sometimes modify this list. Some examples of what might constitute special circumstances include the following:
The murder was to obtain a financial benefit.
The defendant has a prior murder conviction.
The defendant murdered multiple people in the same trial.
The victim was a state or federal peace officer or firefighter.
The victim was a judge, prosecutor, or juror killed in retaliation or to prevent them from performing their duties.
The victim was a witness who was killed to silence them.
A bomb or destructive device was used to commit murder.
The murder was committed to prevent arrest or escape.
The murder was committed by lying in wait.
The murder was committed using poison.
The murder involved the torture of the victim.
The murder was part of a hate crime based on race or religion.
The murder was committed in the commission of a felony.
A murder was in a drive-by shooting.
A street gang member committed a murder.
The murder was committed (or attempted) during specific felony crimes such as robbery, rape, arson, kidnapping.
Notably, a first-degree murder conviction becomes a special circumstances murder if you were previously convicted of first or second-degree murder in California or anywhere else.
wow those hippy dippy commies in the main blue state have the death penalty ?
whouda thunk it.