MovieChat Forums > Politics > WEF Admits COVID Was a ‘Test’ of Public’...

WEF Admits COVID Was a ‘Test’ of Public’s Obedience to New World Order


WEF Admits COVID Was a ‘Test’ of Public’s Obedience to New World Order

The World Economic Forum (WEF) has admitted that the COVID-19 pandemic was a test of the public’s obedience in accepting their ‘New World Order’.

The WEF posted the following admission to the “My Carbon” page of its website where they make a pitch for 15-minute smart cities.

http://Thegatewaypundit.com reports: The first of three “developments” that the WEF says must be in place before the world can evolve into its utopian vision of “smart and sustainable cities,” is compliance with restrictions on our freedom. It writes:

1. COVID-19 was the test of social responsibility – A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were adopted by billions of citizens across the world. There were numerous examples globally of maintaining social distancing, wearing masks, mass vaccinations and acceptance of contact-tracing applications for public health, which demonstrated the core of individual social responsibility.

They were testing us. That’s what Covid was all about. They wanted to see how many of us would give up our individual freedom and individual sovereignty by complying with a “new normal” that consisted of restrictions bordering on the absurd.

Why, for instance was it “safe” to shop at Lowe’s or Home Depot but unsafe to shop at a small business or attend church? Why was it OK to go to strip clubs in Michigan but you couldn’t buy seeds for a garden?

What the WEF is implying with its above statement is that in order to be “sustainable,” people and societies will need to be compliant with a new more authoritarian global order. Don’t ask questions. Don’t resort to logic. Just obey.

Would we be obedient in the face of idiotic new laws and regulations, like wearing face diapers to stop what was said to be an aerosolized virus, and standing six feet apart in public, and submitting to a never-before-used, unlicensed mRNA gene-based injection?

They said it was good for you, so roll up your sleeve. Don’t ask questions. If you did, you could lose your job and be treated as a societal outcast. Many people lost friends or even close family members to this monstrous “test” of our willingness to unquestioningly do what we’re told.

Nearly five years later, arguably the most powerful nonprofit public-private partnership in the world, the WEF, admits it was all a test of our wills and celebrates the fact that most of us failed the test (or passed with flying colors depending how you look at it).

They wanted to find out how many of us would prove our servitude to the lawless, fascistic beast system by complying with “unimaginable restrictions,” many of which were created out of thin air with absolutely no scientific evidence to back them up as contributing anything to public health.

The U.S. government’s top health bureaucrat, Dr. Anthony Fauci, admitted recently that there was no science behind his decision to require Americans to socially distance six feet apart.

reply

The World Economic Forum (WEF) has admitted that the COVID-19 pandemic was a test of the public’s obedience in accepting their ‘New World Order’.

The WEF posted the following admission..



This definitely sounds like fake news. Why don't you link to the exact alleged admission on the WEF website?

reply

The reality of the past 4 years confirms everything in the OP except for denialists and regime shills.

reply

That's as maybe but beside the point so, let's see a link to the 'confession' by the WEF. I mean it must exist.. right? I can't see it there.

https://www.weforum.org/

Why is it the first to shout FAKE NEWS! are the first to fall for it?

reply

That’s a futile effort considering that you will deny and deflect with the usual sophistry and gaslighting.

Prove me wrong by finding it yourself.

I will even throw you a bone:

It’s on their site under a Sept 14th, 2022 article but posted on Sept, 09 2022 under their “agenda articles.”

reply

I still can't find it and it is weird you do not produce it for an objective perusal by those with less of an agenda; but, if it is actually there, I'm betting it has been subjected to some creative interpretation and misleading emphasis. The OP is all interpretation, and rhetoric..

All we have directly from the WEF is the paragraph about social responsibility - something incidentally the right are often keen on and this as quoted by the dubious news site The Gateway!

A vague set of proposals from an influential organisation has been transformed by online conspiracy theorists into a powerful viral rallying cry. What is the truth behind the "Great Reset"? Believers spin dark tales about an authoritarian socialist world government run by powerful capitalists and politicians - a secret cabal that is broadcasting its plan around the world. Despite all the contradictions in the last sentence, thousands online have latched on to this latest reimagining of an old conspiracy theory - updated for the age of Covid.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-57532368

reply

I'm betting it has been subjected to some creative interpretation and misleading emphasis. The OP is all interpretation, and rhetoric.

Thanks for proving my point ... It never fails.

reply

Produce the whole original article then. Don't be coy. Let's compare what it actually says to what feverish right wingers interpret it as.

Upon investigation it seems the link on Gateway page https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/09/world-economic-forum-finally-tells-truth-about-covid/ is actually to this:

‘My Carbon’: An approach for inclusive and sustainable cities.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/09/my-carbon-an-approach-for-inclusive-and-sustainable-cities/

... scary stuff indeed! lol Definitely not with the content (more than the harmless paragraph quote on the self-evident value of social responsibility) as is claimed by the alarmist post . In other word misleading and fake news. But perhaps there's more and that was just a mistake? But meantime that's my point; it looks like your fail.

reply

And yet, you re-confirmed my statement 100%. lmao

reply

No link then, confirmed 100%.

reply

No links are required. You literally proved my point with denialism, sophistry and gaslighting.

Every. Single. Time.

reply

No links are required.

Funny that...

reply