For every instance of immigrant violent crime, you can probably find ten more cases of some Guatemalan women who walked 1000 miles to Texas border with sick child in arms and proceeded to work the fields of our country picking potatoes, carrots and radishes in conditions that natural born citizens object to.
That's complete fiction, migrant-porn for ignorant leftists. But what are you actually saying? That if we allow 30 million of these invaders into our lands, we can expect 2.7 million of them to commit violent crimes, while the remaining 27.3 million will be thrown onto our already insolvent social welfare programs? Golly, why didn't you say so before!
But I'll tell you what, I'll run the risk of your alleged economic ruin and labor shortages in return for having a land for my people. There's more to life, you Marxist scum, than trying to have the most disposable shit when you die. Communities matter, your neighbors matter, the culture and society that you bequeath your children matters.
Obama received protests about his tough-on-immigration policies while in office, so your worldview is invalid. This is an area of easy compromise as long as we maintain human rights and respect human dignity, and don’t campaign with inflammatory rhetoric.
So what if he received protests? Why didn't he and his solid majorities pass the kinds of substantive border reforms that, in your words, have been a Democrat priority "forever"? The simple answer is that they have no interest in any steps that would deprive them of the opportunity to thumb their nose at America's white population by flooding your neighborhoods with aliens. Of course on the other side of the aisle, you have the Chamber of Commerce Republicans who love driving down your wages to their own profit. The only "bipartisan" solution that our ruling class will accept is one that satisfy both parties in their attempts at demographic replacement for profit
reply
share