MovieChat Forums > Politics > Joe Biden at war with Yemen

Joe Biden at war with Yemen


The New Year could start with a major war in the Red Sea

10 Ansarullah fighters were killed today by the US Navy when an American helicopter destroyed 3 Houthi speedboats, according to the Associated Press

Houthis say US committed an act of war

The spokesman for the Yemeni Armed Forces says the US will pay the price for killing 10 Ansarullah fighters

A member of the Defence Council said it was an act of war and that the US should wait for a response

Mobilisation in Yemen

The Yemeni tribes have called for mobilisation to counter American aggression

Ansarullah's missile force has been put on high alert in case Westerners attack, they want to destroy American bases in the Middle East

We are very lucky to have such a war horny President like Biden and his love of Israel just pulled us into a major new conflict.

God bless him.

reply

You mean the Houthis, as Yemen is in a state of civil war.

reply

Is that how it works, the President just gets to decide who the US is at war with?

Someone who knows more about these things, educate me.

reply

It should be Congress, but the Republican-led Reps. have no interest in actually doing work.

reply

Joe loves war and conflict. Maybe you should vote for Trump.

reply

Trump loves civil war and conflict. Maybe you should vote for Biden.

reply

Another step closer to a WW and the libs jump for joy.

Everyone that voted against Trump should be sent to the front lines of the conflicts.

reply

I still wait for evidence for how the Israel-Palestine flare up, which indirectly led to the Houthis doing this was the fault of Joe Biden.

reply

When Biden became president the world saw a joke. They saw weakness and incompetence.

So when Biden became president, these people now see a time where they can try things they never would have.

When the world sees people like Loyd Austin trying to manage a war, It only emboldens the enemy, because they see Nothing but incompetence.

Under Biden its strike while the iron is hot.
So everyone is rushing to a Democrat controlled border.
Cartels see big business as they are prospering under Biden through human and drug trafficking.
Criminals in the country are emboldened under Biden and Democrats.

Democrats have defunded the police and made them weaker then ever.
Democrats have handcuffed the hands of police and their arresting power.
Democrat no cash bail is a pro criminal bill directly related to the increase in crime.

Democrat prosecutors are
Now working as defense attorneys and reducing charges anywhere they can.
Prosecutors now work to keep criminals out of jail.

Democrats have set up a 3-4 tier system that emboldens criminals and keeps as many criminals out of jail and causing trouble on the steets

reply

What does any of this have to do with Israel and Palestine.

What is it you think Trump would have done? Why would this have not have happened under Trump?

reply

First trump had lots of restrictions agaisnt iran and hamas.

Iran was not able to be profitable under trump.

In a complete turn around, Democrats not only lift iran restrictions,. They give them iran millions.
Democrats give hamas millions.

Iran is a major financier of Hamas.
Democrats are a major financier of Iran.
Biden voters voted for this.

When iran stepped up just a bit, trump sent a strong message by droning one of Iran's leader.

So trump did a lot different.
Trump is much more pro Israel then Democrats. So Hamas would have Israel and the u.s. to contend with.

Instead today they have Israel to contend with and Democrats pushing for a cease fire.

Trump would not ask for a cease fire after what was seen on video by Hamas.
It would take real sick people to ask for such a thing.


reply

>First trump had lots of restrictions agaisnt iran and hamas.

Can you source these restrictions and show me where they came to an end, please?

Can I see some data on any of this please?

>Instead today they have Israel to contend with and Democrats pushing for a cease fire.

*Some* democrats rather meekly pushing for a "cease fire" after months of fighting.

reply

https://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/blog/analysis-of-iranian-oil-sales-under-president-trump-vs-president-biden

Trump enforced a maximum pressure act on Iran with goals of zero profit from oil.
Under trump irans oil industry was losing money

Under Biden, iran is making record profits. Which can be attributed to the funding of Hamas and the attacks on u.s. military in the last month..

reply

I highly doubt he knows who or what Yemen is at this point.

reply

Its weirdos like you who when missiles are flying back and fourth you literally claim no war.
Iran and Yemen have been attacking u.s ships and bases for the last month. They want all out war with the u.s. , but Democrats don't want to admit that.
Which is why the Democrat media is hiding these attacks.

reply

I'm just saying that when Biden hears someone say Yemen he thinks they are talking about the chocolate bars he keeps finding in the litter box because they are Yumens.

reply

Omg

reply

lol

I can see Dictator Joe stumbling around the white house, yelling, wheres my yumens?

reply

Dictator Joe is the best warmongering president ever!

reply

How did Joe "warmonger" this specifically?

reply

He's basically doing what Trump would've done. Trust me, it'd be worse under Trump since he literally LOVES Netty and Israel. It'd be fire and fury on a worse scale. You'd only have to listen to Faux Newz to see how much they complain about Biden's inaction on these.

reply

But it wasn't, he kept the bears at bay because he was feared and respected. No one fears and respects JB.

reply

Palestine (Hamas) didn't attack the USA, they attacked Israel. What does the president have to do with this?

reply

because he was feared and respected
🤣👍😁😂🤣😁
Thats really funny

I'm sure world leaders like Putin , KGB officer who took a whole country and installed himself as permanent leader and rules with an iron fist having dissenters poisoned or thrown out of windows is really scared of the orange gibbon who can barely read and has the mentality of a 5 year old playground liar.

He was probably rolling on the floor in stitches at Trumps attempt to copy him on Jan 6th.

reply

And yet, they all knew better than to start wars while Trump was president. You can't say the same about Biden.

reply

Hamas (not Gaza) started a war with Israel, also killing Americans. Hezbullah and Houthis joined in, attacking Americans. The US helped Israel by shooting down missles.

What does that Axis of Evil have in common? They are puppets of Iran! So Iran started this proxy war against the Great Satans, US and Israel. What should the US be doing instead? Destroy Iran instead of their puppets!

There was a popular song once, "Bomb, Bomb Iran". For all you Village Idiots, Islamic revolutionaries invaded the US embassy and took hostages. If the US had nuked Iran afterwards, none of this would be happening!

reply

Zionists started the war in 1948 which never ended. Israel wants the U.S. to start a war with Iran and it appears that Biden is willing to accommodate.

The U.S. and Brits overthrew the Iran's democratically-elected Prime Minister and replaced him with the unpopular puppet Shah.

reply

> Zionists started the war in 1948 which never ended.

What a BS notion. Muslims were always persecuting non-Muslim all over that area in the same way they persecute and murder Kurds and Yazidis. The only recourse any civilized people have to try to coexist with Islam is to form their own state and kick the terrorists out.

Then terrorists and terrorist supporters like you falsely whine about genocide and ethnic cleansing.

To defend Islamic countries who do want to apply laws when it suits them but refuse to sign or follow the declaration of human rights.

What a patheticly ignorant pupper of Hamas and Iran you are.

Keelai = ISIS

reply

Palestinians have a right to defend themselves and their borders from white European colonizers and their oppressive open-air prison and racist apartheid system.

European Jews invaded and ethnic cleansed 750,000 POC Palestinians in 1948. Those Palestinians included Jews, Muslims, Christians and Druze.

Now, Netanyahu states that only Israel should control the Egyptian-Gaza border. Typical entitled, arrogant, racist behavior!

You mean Christians were always persecuting non-Christians and POC of any religion all over the world in the same way they persecute and murder Jews (Holocaust; pogroms, Spanish Inquisition, Tree of Life Synagogue, etc), Muslims (Palestinians, Iraqis, Afghans, etc.), Indigenous-Americans, black people, Asians and each other (Russia/Ukraine war).

TrentnQuarantino = VILE RACIST

reply

Muslims have been invading and conquering other people's land for over a thousand years. You can't invade and conquer millions of square miles of land belonging to others and then claim that you of all people have the right to defend "your borders" from others. And Hamas isn't "defending" anyone. Hamas didn't "defend" anyone on October 7th. It merely attacked and slaughtered. Those "European colonizers" are Jews indigenous to Israel. And half those Jews didn't even come from Europe but Asia and Africa. Israel is the least racist country in the Mideast. There's over a million non-Jewish citizens of Israel but only 32 Jews in the 4 Arab countries bordering Israel. And Israel is NOT apartheid:

https://www.thetower.org/article/the-apartheid-libel-a-legal-refutation/

Jews have lived in the land of Israel non-stop for 3,000 years. European Jews have been coming to the land of Israel non-stop for over a thousand years. Zionist Jews had already been in the land of Israel for half a century before the State of Israel was established. The Nakba occurred in the midst of a failed attempt by the Arabs to push the Jews into the sea. There was ethnic cleansing on both sides during the war and the ethnic cleansing done by the Arabs was worse because there were 100,000 Arabs still in Israel when it was over while every single Jew in the West Bank and East Jerusalem was driven out by the Arabs. I already explained to you that there were no "Palestinian" Jews ethnically cleansed by Israel in 1948. If that was true, where did they go? By the end of the war, all of the Jews in the former British Mandate were in the State of Israel.

Christian persecution was worse than Muslim persecution of Jews a long time ago but nowadays the Christian world's treatment of Jews is head and shoulders above the Muslim world. The vast majority of Jews outside of Israel currently live in Christian-majority countries while less than 1% of Jews live in Muslim-majority countries. In the contemporary world, Christians are kicking the Muslims' butt in the tolerance of other religions. You're just trying to live in the past.

reply

Why wouldn't a Jewish school that you claimed to have attended for years wouldn't prepare you for your Bar Mitzvah?
You need to lie better!

I'm ignoring your Islamophobic rant based solely on your hatred.

reply

Why are you asking about my Bar Mitzvah when I didn't say anything about it? Your illiteracy is showing again. It's not an Islamophobic rant. Your illiteracy just makes you think that it is. You couldn't explain to me the supposed difference between the truth and my alleged Islamophobia if your very life depended on it.

reply

[deleted]

Nothing I said came anywhere close to an admission about anything. You only have to troll like this because you don't have the facts on your side and you can't handle that.

Why don't you act like a mature adult and engage in civil discussion?

reply

Are you admitting now that you lied about being Jewish?

I find your lying interesting. Why did you lie about being Jewish? Do you believe all Jews hate Muslims, therefore it would give you a "free pass" to spew Islamophobic hatred?

BTW, they don't.

reply

Nothing I said came anywhere close to an admission about anything. I find you lying about me lying about being Jewish interesting. You don't care how much it offends me because you're a complete psychopath.

reply

I'm offended by your anti-Semitic characterization of Jewish people.

reply

What "anti-Semitic characterization of Jewish people" are you talking about? I didn't make any characterization of Jewish people. And why the hell would an antisemitic characterization of Jews actually offend you in the first place? Antisemitic characterizations of the Yale Law School library don't offend you:

https://moviechat.org/bd0000082/Politics/6557b2388d98285a4909ce68/About-that-Hamas-charter

reply

All you ever have is to cook up exaggerated beyond reality claims about me being racist, which is really just lying and name-calling.

When you look at wars and deaths across the world .... objectively and realitistically you see that the vast majority of them involve Muslims. That's not racism, that's just a fact.

Finally, you are just a hopeless, sad sack, uncivilized person who identifies so closely with and so strongly and illogically defend terrorists that you are a terrorist yourself.

reply

Your made-up stats don't impress me.

You disparage ALL Muslims by stereotyping them as terrorists, then you have the audacity to deny being a racist.

TrentnQuarantino = VILE RACIST

reply

Your made-up stats don't impress me.


What makes your made-up stat that most Jews support a ceasefire impressive?

reply

Keelai,

No, the Arabs started the war in 1948. They actually admitted it. Jamal al-Husseini of the Arab Higher Committee said this:

The representative of the Jewish Agency told us yesterday that they were not the attackers, that the Arabs had begun the fighting. We did not deny this. We told the whole world that we were going to fight.


The Arabs' war against Israel never ended. Over 20,000 Palestinians are dead now because of the Hamas attack. They would all still be alive if not for the Hamas attack. You can't deny the obvious. As I already explained to you, Iran is already at war with the U.S. All the militias in other parts of the Mideast that have been attacking U.S. military forces since October are controlled by Iran. Iran's attacks on U.S. military forces are what Biden is willing to accommodate. Iran is lucky because another President might be less accommodating of these attacks.

It's completely false that the U.S. and UK overthrew the democratically-elected Prime Minister of Iran. Mossadegh wasn't democratically elected. Mossadegh was appointed Prime Minister by the shah. The shah also had the constitutional authority to remove the Prime Minister. The shah was the leader of Iran before he appointed Mossadegh and never stopped being the leader while Mossadegh was Prime Minister:

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/israel-middle-east/articles/cia-coup-in-iran-that-never-was-mossadegh

reply

The problem with Keelai is that he is probably some kind of fake account AI being tested, for even if you prove logically and solidly something, he will reject it and reset his ignorance back and argue the same nonsense based on nothing again and again, and call you names.

On the other hand, the coup against Mossadegh, is established fact. I don't know why you would go there, or feel you need to go there?

The US is waiting for that point when Iran pushes it too far and then SLAMMO - they are going to get the long-needed Iraq treatment. Who knows what will happen after that because this area of the world has people who have almost been bred not to think for themselves, they are used to being slaves to an absurdist ideology that they do not even understand and will have a hard time changing.

Islam is a huge problem with the world, but also for Muslims.

reply

Everyone in America has heard references to the so-called "coup" in Iran in 1953 for many years but very few know the details of what actually happened. The whole idea of a coup is that it's illegal. But what happened to Mossadegh was fully legal. The shah had the constitutional authority to remove the Prime Minister and in 1953 he signed a royal edict removing Mossadegh as Prime Minister.

reply

Are you arguing that there was no coup, and that it led to good things in Iran?

reply

I'm only arguing that there was no coup. I'm not arguing that the shah's removal of Mossadegh as Prime Minister led to good things in Iran.

reply

And yet the CIA was working to create a coup and took credit for it. The people behind what happened were CIA and oil companies.

reply

it wasn't a coup for the reasons I explained and the shah's legal removal of Mossadegh as Prime Minister was carried out through the machinations of powerful elements within the Iranian government

reply

You just prefer it not be called a coup. It was a coup.

reply

No, it has nothing to do with my preference. A coup is a specifically illegal overturning of the legitimate government leadership. What happened in Iran in 1953 wasn't a coup because the shah legitimately removed Mossadegh as Prime Minister through fully legal means.

reply

Who put the Shah in power?

reply

No one put the Shah in power. He simply inherited the throne when his father died.

reply

And you imply that is legitimate?
How did Mosaddegh get to power?

reply

It's as legitimate as any other royal dynasty. Mossadegh became Prime Minister through the Shah's appointment.

reply

> It's as legitimate as any other royal dynasty.

catch up to the 21st century, the age of kings and queens is gone, but there were never legitimate,
at least according to our founders who told us that
legitimate power derives from the consent of the
people.

you're just trolling on a subject that has no importance.

Oh, I get it, your the Shah's great grandson and you want to convince people you should shit on the peacock throne, because you're such a peacock

reply

Perhaps I should have said that it was as legitimate as any other royal dynasty rather than saying that it is as legitimate as any other royal dynasty. But that was the 20th Century, not the 21st. And even some countries today still have kings and queens.

I'm not trolling. I'm just discussing the facts. If it weren't important then you wouldn't be discussing them with me. Arguing about the general legitimacy of the inherited political power of royalty doesn't change the facts of what happened in Iran in 1953.

reply

> I'm not trolling. I'm just discussing the facts.

BS, you're annoyingly and pointlessly trying to harp on a waste of time thing - the def.

reply

I'm not sure that you know what the word 'trolling' actually means. I'm just discussing facts. You chose to dispute what I told Keelai about what happened in Iran in 1953. You chose to continue discussing that issue with me for the past few days. You asked me questions of fact and I simply provided the answers. That's not trolling by any stretch. If you think this issue is "a waste of time thing" then why did you choose to discuss it with me in the first place?

reply

Islamophobia

reply

The Houthis who have been firing missiles up the Arabia peninsula trying to hit Israel are claiming the US committed an act of war.

The Iranian-backed Houthi rebels need their bases to get the same treatment as Gaza.

They are screwing with the whole world's oil supply chain, and the US is totally right to slam the bejeebers out of them, and should do more than that.

Then turn sights onto Iran. Like the Palestinians, Iran has been given chance after chance to reform their hate-driven society and stop their military expansion. At some point they are going to be taught a lesson, but it will not be a lesson because like Hamas their terrorist government will be annihilated.

With Biden it is not just a love of Israel, it is love of freedom, progress, democracy, and opposition to all the disgusting Islamic death cult opposes. Whatever it takes Israel should get US support, and not be subject to the tantrums of ignorant demonstrators who don't have jobs, or pay taxes, or have any idea what the USA and Israel stand for.

reply

Houthis are in their own area, the Middle East. The U.S. is where they don't belong.

reply

The Houthis' missiles launched against Israel are certainly not "in their own area". And the Houthis attacking cargo ships in the Red Sea are certainly not "in their own area". The U.S. has nothing to do with any of that so you can't blame any of the Houthis' clear misdeeds on the U.S. supposedly being where it "doesn't belong".

reply

When Keelai finally makes an actual comment or claim instead of just jabbering insults and lies, he says somsething worthy of bin Laden like ...

> The U.S. is where they don't belong.

If it were not for the US Navy the shipping lanes for oil would be constantly blocked or troubled and prices would go up all over the world and economies would die, along with people. You bet the US belongs.

reply

Imperialist!

reply

How dim can you be?

I guess you would prefer a Chinese Empire, or a Russian One, or maybe a unifed Islamic Caliphate is your cup of tea. The way you hate Israel and
defend Hamas and the Palestinians, I think you must believe the world
would be better under Sharia Law and the Ayatollahs.

Until there is some global democratic order that is workable, I am resigned
that the best the world can do is the American empire.

reply

European colonists aren't in their own area.

reply

So what does that mean to you beside another thoughtless smart remark?

reply

Keelai,

There are no more European colonists. Europeans gave up on colonialism a long time ago. You're trying to live in the past.

reply