MovieChat Forums > Politics > Whore/Ho/Slut/Porn Star Mia Khalifa fire...

Whore/Ho/Slut/Porn Star Mia Khalifa fired by Playboy and others for supporting Hamas

posted a year ago by Rorikon (17855)
34 replies | jump to latest

https://www.thejc.com/news/news/playboy-praised-for-stronger-stance-on-israel-than-harvard-university-after-firing-pro-hamas-actress-5XgYag1cPi1GqqKpXgKe8L
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/mia-khalifa-fired-by-canadian-broadcaster-todd-shapiro-over-horrendous-tweet-supporting-hamas-4466478

https://twitter.com/miakhalifa

She's gone full SJW/Activist mode. Be careful when you put your dick in crazy, especially one like her, she may behead your American penis by the frenulum. I wonder if she'll remain in America if she gets fired from all her jobs. Will she be recruited and lured into Palestine with her bad boy Hamas man that will pump her full of Hamas babies before regretting her choice?

https://youtu.be/XnC6ooKGjOs

reply

[–] [deleted] a year ago

case in point, they all support this stuff, even the ones who claim not to be religious, so secular they work in porn! but when it comes down to it they all support these things, now our countries are infested with them.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

I am secular.

I do not support Hamas.

reply

[–] [deleted] a year ago

Taqiyyah : An islamic practice in concealing ones conviction and faith or beliefs from the enemies/infidel usually in different countries or social situations and it is one of the religious obligations within the muslim faith.

Hiding one's beliefs or lying has been a feature of Islam since its earliest days, and is acknowledged by Muslims of virtually all persuasions.[7] However, the use of Taqiyyah varies, especially between Sunni and Shia Muslims. Sunni Muslims gained political supremacy over time and therefore only occasionally found the need to practice Taqiyyah. On the other hand, the minority Shiah community developed taqiyyah as an instinctive method of self-preservation and protection in hostile environments.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

Are you accusing me of pretending to be an atheist?

If you're just going to assume someone is lying, how can they possibly disprove it? It's unfalsifiable.

I could just accuse you of pretending to be a right-wing christian fundamentalist and that you're actually just a covert hamas defender yourself.

reply

[–] Allison44 (602) a year ago

Very interesting. For the first time, I actually learned something new on MC. I have long suspected the subterfuge of Muslims but didn't know it's actually part of doctrine.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

He just threw it randomly at people. So do you thus think I am lying about my beliefs?

reply

[–] Allison44 (602) a year ago

I have no opinion on your sincerity. I was responding to the other post

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (17405) a year ago

Why are people listening when whores talk?

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

I can feel the Christian values from this comment.

In fact, this sort of sentence brings to mind how Islamists might talk about women in sex-related professions.

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (17405) a year ago

Islam is right about women.

Whores are shunned in all cultures but degeneracy.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

So you think women should be second-class citizens and forced to cover up in public?

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (17405) a year ago

You think all women are whores? Wow.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

That's not what I asked you. If you agree with Islam, does that mean you think women should be second-class citizens and forced to cover up in public?

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (17405) a year ago

So you think women should be...

You changed the topic from whores to all women in attempt to strawman, nice try.

If you agree with Islam?

I don't agree with Islam as a whole, they are just right about women...has nothing specifically to do with whores. Try to keep up.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

>You changed the topic from whores to all women in attempt to strawman, nice try.

You said, specifically: "Islam is right about women." Islam thinks that women should be second-class citizens and forced to cover-up in public. Do you agree or disagree with that?

>I don't agree with Islam at all, they are just right about women...has nothing specifically to do with whores. Try to keep up.

I didn't ask you about "whores" in the first place.

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (17405) a year ago

Dude, "Islam is Right About Women" is a fucking MEME. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣 Are you some kind of Boomer? (Oh wait, I think you are iirc, LMAO!)

I didn't ask you about "whores" in the first place.

Which is called a strawman argument. Bad faith, Gramps.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

>Dude, "Islam is Right About Women" is a fucking MEME. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣 Are you some kind of Boomer? (Oh wait, I think you are iirc, LMAO!)

I know it's a meme. It's also used in a different context to how you used it. It's an attempt to trap left-wingers and progressives who can't criticise the Islamic world. Thankfully, I'm not one of them.

So you don't really mean it? You don't think Islam is right about women?

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (17405) a year ago

It's an attempt to trap left-wingers and progressives who can't criticise the Islamic world.

It works perfectly, as I've demonstrated for all to see lol.

You don't think Islam is right about women?

I don't give a fuck about Islam other than it needs MAJOR REFORM as a world religion, and political system.

The fact that female empowerment leads to destruction of civil society has nothing to to do with organized religion, this is well documented throughout history. History also shows hard patriarchy always replaces post-female empowerment collapse.

Reap what ya sow.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

>It works perfectly, as I've demonstrated for all to see lol.

How? When did I give the impression I was unwilling to criticise Islam?

>The fact that female empowerment leads to destruction of civil society has nothing to to do with organized religion, this is well documented throughout history. History also shows hard patriarchy always replaces post-female empowerment collapse.

Provide evidence that female empowerment leads to the "destruction of civil society". And qualify what you mean specifically by "female empowerment".

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (17405) a year ago

🤣😂🤣😂🤣

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

So you have no argument.

reply

[–] Skavau (15993) a year ago

Are you going to answer me here?

reply

[–] AustraliBoy98 (223) a year ago

[deleted]

[–] Thaistickers (1500) a year ago

You RWNJs are too farcical, she's a born and bred Lebonese, never been a "SJW." I know you have to lie because the facts are against you, but you're really pushing it with a well-known figure like Khalifa.

reply

[–] Rorikon (17855) a year ago

Guess you've never seen her posts, she's a SJW. Supports BLM etc. As for being well known, yeah, well known for taking dick and was one of first muzzie to break out on the scene. Now you got hijab porn as a thing. If she were to go to any other ME nation, they'd stone her the first chance they can get. I get it, you're simping for her and need to defend used goods in hopes of getting any.

reply

[–] Thaistickers (1500) a year ago

No one knows her as a SJW, you pawn!

reply

[–] elcamino (15540) a year ago

I haven't seen anyone leave the line that is for a turn at banging her.

reply

[–] Thaistickers (1500) a year ago

Such an intelligent post. Are you an Ivy League grad?

reply

[–] elcamino (15540) a year ago

https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.fioMeB8nEH2KSTCPdbz2BgAAAA?pid=ImgDet&rs=1

reply

[–] Thaistickers (1500) a year ago

I don't click on links from idiots. Can you think for yourself?

reply

[–] elcamino (15540) a year ago

You can't wait for one of the times she is passed out drunk.

reply

[–] Thaisticks (3020) a year ago

You're projecting, elcaminA.

reply

[–] B1cKsurN (17405) a year ago

🤣😂🤣😂🤣

reply

[–] Rorikon (17855) a year ago

It just shows the depravity of how desperate the simps will go.

reply